Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Differentiate Thyroid Follicular Adenoma from Carcinoma with Combined Ultrasound Radiomics Features and Clinical Ultrasound Features

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Noninvasive differentiating thyroid follicular adenoma from carcinoma preoperatively is of great clinical value to decrease the risks resulted from excessive surgery for patients with follicular neoplasm. The purpose of this study is to investigate the accuracy of ultrasound radiomics features integrating with ultrasound features in the differentiation between thyroid follicular carcinoma and adenoma. A total of 129 patients diagnosed as thyroid follicular neoplasm with pathologically confirmed follicular adenoma and carcinoma were enrolled and analyzed retrospectively. Radiomics features were extracted from preoperative ultrasound images with manually contoured targets. Ultrasound features and clinical parameters were also obtained from electronic medical records. Radiomics signature, combined model integrating radiomics features, ultrasound features, and clinical parameters were constructed and validated to differentiate the follicular carcinoma from adenoma. A total of 23 optimal features were selected from 449 extracted radiomics features. Clinical and ultrasound parameters of sex (p = 0.003), interior structure (p = 0.035), edge (p = 0.02), platelets (p = 0.007), and creatinine (p = 0.001) were associated with the differentiation between benign and malignant follicular neoplasm. The values of area under curves (AUCs) of the radiomics signature, clinical model, and combined model were 0.772 (95% CI: 0.707–0.838), 0.792 (95% CI: 0.715–0.869), and 0.861 (95% CI: 0.775–0.909), respectively. A final corrected AUC of 0.844 was achieved for the combined model after internal validation. Radiomics features from ultrasound images combined with ultrasound features and clinical factors are feasible to differentiate thyroid follicular carcinoma from adenoma noninvasive before operation to decrease the unnecessary of diagnostic thyroidectomy for patients with benign follicular adenoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

Yes.

Code Availability

Yes.

References

  1. Stolf BS, Santos MM, Simao DF, et al: Class distinction between follicular adenomas and follicular carcinomas of the thyroid gland on the basis of their signature expression. Cancer 2006;106.:1891–1900.

  2. Howlader N,Noone AM,Krapcho M et al: SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2009 (Vintage 2009 Populations), National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD 2012.

  3. Yoon JH, Kim EK, Youk JH, Moon HJ, Kwak JY: Better understanding in the differentiation of thyroid follicular adenoma, follicular carcinoma, and follicular variant of papillary carcinoma: a retrospective study. Int J Endocrinol 2014:321595.

  4. Sobrinho-Simões M, Eloy C, Magalhães J, Lobo C, Amaro T: Follicular thyroid carcinoma. Mod Pathol Suppl 2011; 2:S10-8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baloch ZW, Fleisher S, LiVolsi VA, Gupta PK: Diagnosis of “follicular neoplasm”: a gray zone in thyroid fineneedle aspiration cytology. Diagn Cytopathol 2002;26(1):41-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. McHenry CR, Phitayakorn R: Follicular adenoma and carcinoma of the thyroid gland. Oncologist 2011;16(5):585-93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hodak SP, Rosenthal DS. American Thyroid Association Clinical Affairs Committee Information for clinicians: commercially available molecular diagnosis testing in the evaluation of thyroid nodule fine-needle aspiration specimens. Thyroid2013;23(2):131-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Baloch ZW, Seethala RR, Faquin WC, et al: Noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP): a changing paradigm in thyroid surgical pathology and implications for thyroid cytopathology. Cancer Cytopathol 2016;124(9):616-20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Castro MR, Gharib H: Continuing controversies in the management of thyroid nodules. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142(11):926-31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Moon WJ, Jung SL, Lee JH, et al: Benign and malignant thyroid nodules: US differentiation--multicenter retrospective study. Radiology 2008;247(3):762-70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hong YJ, Son EJ, Kim EK, Kwak JY, Hong SW, Chang HS: Positive predictive values of sonographic features of solid thyroid nodule. Clin Imaging 2010;34(2):127-33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Friedrich-Rust M, Meyer G, Dauth N, et al: Interobserver agreement of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) and strain elastography for the assessment of thyroid nodules. PLoS 2013; One 8(10):e77927.

  13. Alexander EK, Cooper D: the importance, and important limitations, of ultrasound imaging for evaluating thyroid nodules. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173(19):1796-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin JD, Hsueh C, Chao TC, Weng HF, Huang BY: Thyroid follicular neoplasms diagnosed by high-resolution ultrasonography with fine needle aspiration cytology. Acta Cytol 1997;41(3):687-91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Koike E, Noguchi S, Yamashita H, et al: Ultrasonographic characteristics of thyroid nodules: prediction of malignancy. Arch Surg 2001;136(3):334-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rago T, Di Coscio G, Basolo F, et al: Combined clinical, thyroid ultrasound and cytological features help to predict thyroid malignancy in follicular and Hupsilonrthle cell thyroid lesions: results from a series of 505 consecutive patients. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2007;66(1):13-20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Horvath E, Majlis S, Rossi R et al: An ultrasonogram reporting system for thyroid nodules stratifying cancer risk for clinical management. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009;94(5):1748-51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shin I, Kim YJ, Han K, et al: Application of machine learning to ultrasound images to differentiate follicular neoplasms of the thyroid gland. Ultrasonography 2020;39(3):257-265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. van Griethuysen JJM, Fedorov A, Parmar C, et al: Computational radiomics system to decode the radiographic phenotype. Cancer Res 2017;77(21):e104-e107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zwanenburg A, Leger S, Vallières M: Steffen Image biomarker standardisation initiative. eprint arXiv 2016;1612.07003

  21. Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R: Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. J Stat Softw 2010;33(1):1-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Efron B: The bootstrap and modern statistics. J Am Stat Assoc 2000;95:1293-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Blackstone EH: Breaking down barriers: helpful breakthrough statistical methods you need to understand better. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;122:430-9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Smith J, Cheifetz RE, Schneidereit N, Berean K, Thomson T: Can cytology accurately predict benign follicular nodules? Am J Surg 2005;189(5):592-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Carpi A, Nicolini A, Gross MD, et al: Controversies in diagnostic approaches to the indeterminate follicular thyroid nodule. Biomed Pharmacother 2005;59(9):517-20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kuo TC, Wu MH, Chen KY, Hsieh MS, Chen A, Chen CN: Ultrasonographic features for differentiating follicular thyroid carcinoma and follicular adenoma. Asian J Surg 2020;43(1):339-346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sillery JC, Reading CC, Charboneau JW, Henrichsen TL, Hay ID, Mandrekar JN: Thyroid follicular carcinoma: sonographic features of 50 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194(1):44-54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang JZ, Hu B: Sonographic features of thyroid follicular carcinoma in comparison with thyroid follicular adenoma. J Ultrasound Med 2014;33(2):221-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim DW, Lee EJ, Jung SJ, Ryu JH, Kim YM: Role of sonographic diagnosis in managing Bethesda class III nodules. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32(11):2136-41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gweon HM, Son EJ, Youk JH, Kim JA: Thyroid nodules with Bethesda system III cytology: can ultrasonography guide the next step? Ann Surg Oncol 2013;20(9):3083-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yoon JH, Lee HS, Kim EK, Moon HJ, Kwak JY: A nomogram for predicting malignancy in thyroid nodules diagnosed as atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesions of undetermined significance on fine needle aspiration. Surgery 2014; 155(6):1006-13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Seo JK, Kim YJ, Kim KG, Shin I, Shin JH, Kwak JY: Differentiation of the follicular neoplasm on the gray-scale US by image selection subsampling along with the marginal outline using convolutional neural network. Biomed Res Int 2017:3098293.

  33. Boelaert K, Horacek J, Holder RL, Watkinson JC, Sheppard MC, Franklyn JA: Serum thyrotropin concentration as a novel predictor of malignancy in thyroid nodules investigated by fine-needle aspiration. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;91(11):4295-301.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Haymart MR, Repplinger DJ, Leverson GE, et al: Higher serum thyroid stimulating hormone level in thyroid nodule patients is associated with greater risks of differentiated thyroid cancer and advanced tumor stage. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008;93(3):809-14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Brunelli A, Rocco G: Internal validation of risk models in lung resection surgery: bootstrap versus training-and-test sampling. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;131(6):1243-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially funded by Radiation Oncology Basic and Translational Research Key Lab of Wenzhou (2021100848)

Funding

This work was partially funded by Wenzhou Municipal Science and Technology Bureau (2018ZY016, 2019) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.11675122, 2016).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Meixiao Shen, Yan Yang or Xiance Jin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

This study was approved by the institutional review board and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (ECCR no. 2019059). Informed consent was waived by ECCR for the retrospective nature of this study.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 18 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, B., Li, Y., Yu, X. et al. Differentiate Thyroid Follicular Adenoma from Carcinoma with Combined Ultrasound Radiomics Features and Clinical Ultrasound Features. J Digit Imaging 35, 1362–1372 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-022-00639-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-022-00639-2

Keywords

Navigation