Abstract
To empower patients to participate in their medical care and decision-making, effective communication is critical. In radiology, the clinical report is the primary medium of communication. Although radiologists historically have authored reports with the referring provider as the intended reader, patients increasingly access the reports through portals to electronic health record systems. We developed a system named PORTER (Patient-Oriented Radiology Reporter) to augment radiology reports with lay-language definitions. Our IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant study protocol analyzed 100 knee MRI reports from an academic medical center to identify the most commonly utilized terms. A glossary of 313 terms was constructed to include definitions of the terms and, where available, links to reference sources and public-domain images. Flesch-Kincaid readability scores were computed to assure that definitions were readable at or below 10th-grade reading level. The system provided an interactive web site to view outpatient knee MRI exams. After logging in with their exam ID number and date of birth, patients viewed their report annotated with definitions from the glossary. Applicable images were displayed when the user’s mouse hovered over a glossary term. This patient-oriented system can help empower patients to better understand their radiology results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnold CW, McNamara M, El-Saden S, Chen S, Taira RK, Bui AA: Imaging informatics for consumer health: towards a radiology patient portal. J Am Med Inform Assoc 20:1028–1036, 2013
Bruno MA, Petscavage-Thomas JM, Mohr MJ, Bell SK, Brown SD: The “open letter”: radiologists’ reports in the era of patient web portals. J Am Coll Radiol 11:863–867, 2014
Hansberry DR, John A, John E, Agarwal N, Gonzales SF, Baker SR: A critical review of the readability of online patient education resources from RadiologyInfo.Org. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202:566–575, 2014
Burnside ES, et al: The ACR BI-RADS experience: learning from history. J Am Coll Radiol 6:851–860, 2009
Langlotz CP: ACR BI-RADS for breast imaging communication: a roadmap for the rest of radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 6:861–863, 2009
Hansell DM, Bankier AA, MacMahon H, McLoud TC, Muller NL, Remy J: Fleischner Society: glossary of terms for thoracic imaging. Radiology 246:697–722, 2008
Cogbill TH, Ziegelbein KJ: Computed tomography, magnetic resonance, and ultrasound imaging: basic principles, glossary of terms, and patient safety. Surg Clin N Am 91:1–14, 2011
Fardon DF, Williams AL, Dohring EJ, Murtagh FR, Gabriel Rothman SL, Sze GK: Lumbar disc nomenclature: version 2.0: recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society, the American Society of Spine Radiology and the American Society of Neuroradiology. Spine J 14:2525–2545, 2014
Hunter TB, Taljanovic MS: Glossary of medical devices and procedures: abbreviations, acronyms, and definitions. Radiographics 23:195–213, 2003
How to write easy-to-read health materials. Available at www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/etr.html. Accessed 22 May 2015
Weiss BD: Health literacy: a manual for clinicians. American Medical Association Foundation, American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, 2003
Kincaid JP, Fishburne RP, Rogers RL, Chissom BS: Derivation of new readability formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count, and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy enlisted personnel. CNTECHTRA Research Branch Report 8–75. U.S. Navy, Washington, DC, 1975
Fielding RT, Taylor RN: Principled design of the modern Web architecture. ACM Trans Internet Technol 2:115–150, 2002
Walker J, Darer JD, Elmore JG, Delbanco T: The road toward fully transparent medical records. N Engl J Med 370:6–8, 2014
IOM (Institute of Medicine): Best care at lower cost: the path to continuously learning health care in America. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2013
Weingart SN, Rind D, Tofias Z, Sands DZ: Who uses the patient internet portal? The PatientSite experience. J Am Med Inform Assoc 13:91–95, 2006
Keselman A, et al.: Towards consumer-friendly PHRs: patients’ experience with reviewing their health records. AMIA Annu Symp Proc:399–403, 2007
Gunn A, Mangano M, Sahani D, Boland G, Choy G: Structured feedback from patients on actual radiology reports: a novel approach to improve reporting practices. Available at: http://archive.rsna.org/2014/14011827.html. Proc. Radiological Society of North America Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting: Chicago, IL, 2014
Johnson AJ, Easterling D, Nelson R, Chen MY, Frankel RM: Access to radiologic reports via a patient portal: clinical simulations to investigate patient preferences. J Am Coll Radiol 9:256–263, 2012
Zeng-Treitler Q, Goryachev S, Kim H, Keselman A, Rosendale D: Making texts in electronic health records comprehensible to consumers: a prototype translator. AMIA Annu Symp Proc:846–850, 2007
Hansberry DR, Agarwal N, Baker SR: Health literacy and online educational resources: an opportunity to educate patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:111–116, 2015
SNOMED CT: Available at http://www.ihtsdo.org/snomed-ct/. Accessed 31 Jul 2015
McDonald CJ, et al: LOINC, a universal standard for identifying laboratory observations: a 5-year update. Clin Chem 49:624–633, 2003
Lowe HJ, Barnett GO: Understanding and using the medical subject headings (MeSH) vocabulary to perform literature searches. JAMA 271:1103–1108, 1994
Rubin DL: Creating and curating a terminology for radiology: ontology modeling and analysis. J Digit Imaging 21:355–362, 2008
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the authors’ organization and complied with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oh, S.C., Cook, T.S. & Kahn, C.E. PORTER: a Prototype System for Patient-Oriented Radiology Reporting. J Digit Imaging 29, 450–454 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-016-9864-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-016-9864-2