Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Development of Automated Detection of Radiology Reports Citing Adrenal Findings

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of automated detection of adrenal nodules, a common finding on CT, using a newly developed search engine that mines dictated radiology reports. To ensure Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliance, we utilized a preexisting de-identified database of 32,974 CT reports from February 1, 2009 to February 28, 2010. Common adrenal descriptors from 29 staff radiologists were used to develop an automated rule-based algorithm targeting adrenal findings. Each sentence within the free text of reports was searched with an adapted NegEx negation algorithm. The algorithm was refined using a 2-week test period of reports and subsequently validated using a 6-week period. Manual review of the 3,693 CT reports in the validation period identified 222 positive reports while the algorithm detected 238 positive reports. The algorithm identified one true positive report missed on manual review for a total of 223 true positive reports. This resulted in a precision of 91% (217 of 238) and a recall of 97% (217 of 223). The sensitivity of the query was 97.3% (95% confidence interval (CI), 93.9–98.9%), and the specificity was 99.3% (95% CI, 99.1–99.6%). The positive predictive value of the algorithm was 91.0% (95% CI, 86.6–94.3%), and the negative predictive value was 99.8% (95% CI, 99.6–99.9%). The prevalence of true positive adrenal findings identified by the query (7.1%) was nearly identical to the true prevalence (7.2%). Automated detection of language describing common findings in imaging reports, such as adrenal nodules on CT, is feasible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kloos RT, et al: Incidentally discovered adrenal masses. Endocr Rev 16(4):460–484, 1995

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Song JH, Chaudhry FS, Mayo-Smith WW: The incidental adrenal mass on CT: prevalence of adrenal disease in 1,049 consecutive adrenal masses in patients with no known malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190(5):1163–1168, 2008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Song JH, Chaudhry FS, Mayo-Smith WW: The incidental indeterminate adrenal mass on CT (>10 H) in patients without cancer: is further imaging necessary? Follow-up of 321 consecutive indeterminate adrenal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189(5):1119–1123, 2007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Grumbach MM, et al: Management of the clinically inapparent adrenal mass (“incidentaloma”). Ann Intern Med 138(5):424–429, 2003

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Berland LL, et al: Managing incidental findings on abdominal CT: white paper of the ACR incidental findings committee. J Am Coll Radiol 7(10):754–773, 2010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Management of the Clinically Inapparent Adrenal Mass (Incidentaloma): National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement February 4–6, 2002. 2002. Available from: http://consensus.nih.gov/2002/2002AdrenalIncidentalomasos021html.htm.

  7. Zeiger MA, et al: The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American Association of Endocrine Surgeons medical guidelines for the management of adrenal incidentalomas. Endocr Pract 15(Suppl 1):1–20, 2009

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Graham DJ, McHenry CR: The adrenal incidentaloma: guidelines for evaluation and recommendations for management. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 7(4):749–764, 1998

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Swanson DR: Searching natural language text by computer. Machine indexing and text searching offer an approach to the basic problems of library automation. Science 132:1099–1104, 1960

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Friedman C, Hripcsak G: Natural language processing and its future in medicine. Acad Med 74(8):890–895, 1999

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hripcsak G, et al: Unlocking clinical data from narrative reports: a study of natural language processing. Ann Intern Med 122(9):681–688, 1995

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sager N, et al: Natural language processing and the representation of clinical data. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1(2):142–160, 1994

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Langlotz CP: Automatic structuring of radiology reports: harbinger of a second information revolution in radiology. Radiology 224(1):5–7, 2002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Elkin PL, et al: A controlled trial of automated classification of negation from clinical notes. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 5:13, 2005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang Y, Lowe HJ: A novel hybrid approach to automated negation detection in clinical radiology reports. J Am Med Inform Assoc 14(3):304–311, 2007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mutalik PG, Deshpande A, Nadkarni PM: Use of general-purpose negation detection to augment concept indexing of medical documents: a quantitative study using the UMLS. J Am Med Inform Assoc 8(6):598–609, 2001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Benitah N, et al: Minor morphologic abnormalities of adrenal glands at CT: prognostic importance in patients with lung cancer. Radiology 235(2):517–522, 2005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chapman WW, et al: A simple algorithm for identifying negated findings and diseases in discharge summaries. J Biomed Inform 34(5):301–310, 2001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Aronow DB, Fangfang F, Croft WB: Ad hoc classification of radiology reports. J Am Med Inform Assoc 6(5):393–411, 1999

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Vella A, Nippoldt TB, Morris 3rd, JC: Adrenal hemorrhage: a 25-year experience at the Mayo Clinic. Mayo Clin Proc 76(2):161–168, 2001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bovio S, et al: Prevalence of adrenal incidentaloma in a contemporary computerized tomography series. J Endocrinol Invest 29(4):298–302, 2006

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hedeland H, Ostberg G, Hokfelt B: On the prevalence of adrenocortical adenomas in an autopsy material in relation to hypertension and diabetes. Acta Med Scand 184(3):211–214, 1968

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanna M. Zafar.

Appendix

Appendix

Table

Table 5 Phrases disagreed on during the manual review

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zopf, J.J., Langer, J.M., Boonn, W.W. et al. Development of Automated Detection of Radiology Reports Citing Adrenal Findings. J Digit Imaging 25, 43–49 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-011-9425-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-011-9425-7

Keywords

Navigation