Abstract
A virtual medical imaging department is an innovative and demanding organizational model, to the extent that the underlying goal is to achieve a continuous and advanced organizational integration of human and physical resources, clinical data, and clienteles. To better understand the kind of benefits offered, we conducted a survey of three groups of users—radiologists, radiological technologists, and medical specialists—working in a five-site virtual organization. We received 127 valid questionnaires, for an overall response rate of 66%. The assessments vary according to the use made of the system. The scores for system quality and the quality of the data produced were markedly higher for intra-hospital use (respectively 7.9 and 8.7 out of 10) than for inter-hospital use (5.4 and 7.0). Despite the negative assessments they made of inter-hospital use, users maintained a positive attitude toward some type of virtual organization of medical imaging. Indeed, the score for Overall satisfaction with the system was very high, 8.9 out of 10. Moreover, the scores for Intended future use of the system were very high for both intra-hospital use (8.9) and inter-hospital use (8.7). We also found significant differences in perceptions among user groups.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Reiner BI, Seigel EL, Sidiqqui K: Evolution of the digital revolution: a radiologist perspective. J Digit Imaging 16(4):324–330, 2003
van de Wetering R, Batenburg R, Versendaal J, Lederman R, Firth L: A balanced evaluation perspective: picture archiving and communication system impacts on hospital workflow. J Digit Imaging 19(Suppl. 1):10–17, 2006
Crowe B, Sim L: Implementation of a radiology information system/picture archiving and communication system and an image transfer system at a large public teaching hospital–assessment of success of adoption by clinicians. J Telemed Telecare 10(Suppl 1):25–27, 2004
Yu P, Hilton P: Work practice changes caused by the introduction of a picture archiving and communication system. J Telemed Telecare 11(Suppl 2):104–107, 2005
Pilling JR: Picture archiving and communication systems: the users’ view. The British Journal of Radiology 76:519–524, 2003
Watkins J: A hospital-wide picture archiving and communication system (PACS): the views of users and providers of the radiology service at Hammersmith Hospital. Eur J Radiol 32:106–112, 1999
Reiner BI, Seigel EL, Hooper FJ: Accuracy of interpretation of CT scans: comparing PACS monitor displays and hard-copy images. Am J Roentgenol 179:1407–1410, 2002
Lepanto L, Paré G, Aubry D, Robillard P, Lesage J: Impact of PACS on dictation turnaround time and productivity. J Digit Imaging 19(1):92–97, 2006
Fleishon HB, Bhargavan M, Meghea C: Radiologists’ reading times using PACS and using films: one practice’s experience. Acad Radiol 13:453–460, 2006
Reiner BI, Seigel EL: PACS in radiology—technologists’ productivity when using PACS: comparison of film-based versus filmless radiography. Am J Roentgenology 179(1):33–37, 2002
Bryan S, Weatherburn GC, Watkins JR, Buxton MJ: The benefits of hospital-wide picture archiving and communication systems: a survey of clinical users or radiology services. Br J Radiol 72:469–478, 1999
Kato H, Kubota G, Kojima K, Hayashi N, Nishihara E, Kura H, Aizawa M: Preliminary time-flow study—comparison of interpretation times between PACS workstations and films. Comput Med Imaging and Graph 19(3):261–265, 1995
Reiner B, Seigel E, Scanlon M: Changes in technologist productivity with implementation of an enterprisewide PACS. J Digit Imaging 15(1):22–26, 2002
Reiner BI, Seigel EL, Carrino JA, Goldburgh MM: SCAR radiologic technologist survey: analysis of the impact of digital technologies on productivity. J Digit Imaging 15(3):132–140, 2002
Nitrosi A, Borasi G, Nicoli F, Modigliani G, Botti A, Bertolini M, Notari P: A filmless radiology department in a full digital regional hospital: quantitative evaluation of the increased quality and efficiency. J Digit Imaging 20(2):140–148, 2007
Mariani C, Tronchi A, Oncini L, Pirani O, Murri R: Analysis of the X-ray work flow in two diagnostic imaging departments with and without a RIS/PACS system. J Digit Imaging 19(Suppl 1):18–28, 2006
Fang YC, Yang MC, Hsueh YS: Financial assessment of a picture archiving and communication system implemented all at once. J Digit Imaging 19(Suppl 1):44–51, 2006
Reddy AS, Loh S, Kane RA: Budget variance analysis of a departmentwide implementation of a PACS at a major academic medical center. J Digit Imaging 19(Suppl 1):66–71, 2006
Charvet-Protat S, Thoral F: Economic evaluation and organizational benefits of picture archiving and communication systems. J Radiol 79(12):1453–1459, 1998
Aas IHM: Organizational cooperation in teleradiology. J Telemed Telecare 11(1):45–50, 2005
Tually P, Stavrianou C, Walker J: User acceptance of the Web-based distribution of radiology services in regional and remote centres of Western Australia. J Telemed Telecare 11(Suppl 2):93–95, 2005
DeLone WH, McLean ER: Information systems success: the quest for the dependant variable. Inform Sys Res 3:60–95, 1992
DeLone WH, McLean ER: The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems success: a ten year update. J Manage Inf Syst 19(4):9–30, 2003
Van der Meijden MJ, Tange HJ, Troost J, Hasman A: Determinants of success of inpatient clinical information systems: a literature review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 10(3):235–243, 2003
Paré G, Lepanto L, Aubry D, Sicotte C: Toward a multidimensional assessment of picture archiving and communication system success. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 21(4):471–479, 2005
Nunally J: Psychometric Methods (2nd Edition), New York: McGraw Hill, 1978
Schepers J, Wetzels M: A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Inf Manage 44(1):90–103, 2007
Barki H, Paré G, Sicotte C: Linking IT implementation and acceptance via the construct of psychological ownership of information technology. J Inf Technol 23(4):269–280, 2008
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank all of the physicians and technologists who took the time to complete our survey and make this study possible. As well, we are indebted to the Canadian Institutes of Health Research for the financial support provided to this research project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
APPENDIX
APPENDIX
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sicotte, C., Paré, G., Bini, K.K. et al. Virtual Organization of Hospital Medical Imaging: A User Satisfaction Survey. J Digit Imaging 23, 689–700 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-009-9220-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-009-9220-x