Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

La chirurgie robotique en oncogynécologie

Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology

  • Mise au Point / Update
  • Published:
Oncologie

Résumé

Le but de cet article est de faire le point sur l’apport du robot en chirurgie gynécologique cancérologique. L’utilisation du robot pour cette chirurgie s’est développée au cours des dix dernières années, remplaçant souvent la coelioscopie. L’apprentissage est plus rapide, les complications diminuent. Le coût du robot reste un frein à son développement. Les études prospectives randomisées restent nécessaires pour confirmer l’utilisation du robot.

Abstract

The aim of this article is to review the contribution of the robot in gynecologic oncological surgery. The robot has been rapidly adopted during the past ten years and often replaces laparoscopy. The learning curve is shorter, morbidity decreases. Cost is the main limitation of its application in gynecologic oncological surgery. Prospective randomized studies are necessary to attest the feasibility of the robot’s usage in such surgeries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Références

  1. Binder-Foucard F, Belot A, Delafosse P, et al. (2013) Estimation nationale de l’incidence et de la mortalité par cancer en France entre 1980 et 2012. Partie 1 — Tumeurs solides. Synthèse. Saint-Maurice (Fra): Institut de veille sanitaire

    Google Scholar 

  2. Holloway RW, Ahmad S (2012) Robotic-assisted surgery in the management of endometrial cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 38: 1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. O’Malley DM, Smith B, Fowler JM (2015) The role of robotic surgery in endometrial cancer. J Surg Oncol 112: 761–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gaia G, Holloway RW, Santoro L, et al. (2010) Robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer compared with traditional laparoscopic and laparotomy approaches: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 116: 1422–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, et al. (2009) Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2. J Clin Oncol 27: 5331–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Seamon LG, Cohn DE, Henretta MS, et al. (2009) Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: robotics or laparoscopy? Gynecol Oncol 113: 36–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yaribakht S, Guillemin F, Harter V, et al. (2015) New approach of learning curve for robotic-assisted gynecologic oncology surgery. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 43: 348–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lim PC, Kang E, Park DH (2011) A comparative detail analysis of the learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy versus laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in treatment of endometrial cancer: a case-matched controlled study of the first one hundred twenty two patients. Gynecol Oncol 120: 413–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Seamon LG, Fowler JM, Richardson DL, et al. (2009) A detailed analysis of the learning curve: robotic hysterectomy and pelvicaortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 114: 162–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoekstra AV, Jairam-Thodla A, Rademaker A, et al. (2009) The impact of robotics on practice management of endometrial cancer: transitioning from traditional surgery. Int J Med Robot 5: 392–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jung YW, Lee DW, Kim SW, et al. (2010) Robot-assisted staging using three robotic arms for endometrial cancer: comparison to laparoscopy and laparotomy at a single institution. J Surg Oncol 101: 116–21

    Google Scholar 

  12. Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, et al. (2008) A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199: 360.e1–9

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bell MC, Torgerson J, Seshadri-Kreaden U, et al. (2008) Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques. Gynecol Oncol 111: 407–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. DeNardis SA, Holloway RW, Bigsby GE, et al. (2008) Robotically-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 111: 412–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Brudie LA, Backes FJ, Ahmad S, et al. (2013) Analysis of disease recurrence and survival for women with uterine malignancies undergoing robotic surgery. Gynecol Oncol 128: 309–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Park HK, Helenowski IB, Berry E, et al. (2015) A comparison of survival and recurrence outcomes in patients with endometrial cancer undergoing robotic versus open surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 22: 961–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cardenas-Goicoechea J, Shepherd A, Momeni M, et al. (2014) Survival analysis of robotic versus traditional laparoscopic surgical staging for endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 210: 160.e1–e11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kilgore JE, Jackson AL, Ko EM, et al. (2013) Recurrence-free and 5-year survival following robotic-assisted surgical staging for endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 129: 49–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, et al. (2012) Recurrence and survival after random assignment to laparoscopy versus laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group LAP2 Study. J Clin Oncol 30: 695–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Eklind S, Lindfors A, Sjöli P, et al. (2015) A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma: Int J Gynecol Cancer 25: 250–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Turner TB, Habib AS, Broadwater G, et al. (2015) Postoperative pain scores and narcotic use in robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer staging. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 22: 1004–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sert BM, Abeler VM (2006) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (Piver type III) with pelvic node dissection — case report. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 27: 531–3

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kruijdenberg CB, van den Einden LC, Hendriks JC, et al. (2011) Robot-assisted versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: a review. Gynecol Oncol 120: 334–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhou J, Xiong BH, Ma L, Cheng Y, et al. (2016) Robotic vs laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a metaanalysis. Int J Med Robot 12: 145–54. (doi: 10.1002/rcs.1652[Epub 2015 Mar 30])

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Asciutto KC, Kalapotharakos G, Löfgren M, et al. (2015) Robotassisted surgery in cervical cancer patients reduces the time to normal activities of daily living. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 94: 260–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hoogendam JP, Verheijen RH, Wegner I, et al. (2014) Oncological outcome and long-term complications in robot-assisted radical surgery for early stage cervical cancer: an observational cohort study. BJOG 121: 1538–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Persson J, Kannisto P, Bossmar T (2008) Robot-assisted abdominal laparoscopic radical trachelectomy. Gynecol Oncol 111: 564–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Burnett AF, Stone PJ, Duckworth LA, et al. (2009) Robotic radical trachelectomy for preservation of fertility in early cervical cancer: case series and description of technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16: 569–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ramirez PT, Schmeler KM, Malpica A, et al. (2010) Safety and feasibility of robotic radical trachelectomy in patients with earlystage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 116: 512–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Persson J, Imboden S, Reynisson P, et al. (2012) Reproducibility and accuracy of robot-assisted laparoscopic fertility sparing radical trachelectomy. Gynecol Oncol 127: 484–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Magrina JF, Pawlina W, Kho RM, et al. (2011) Robotic nervesparing radical hysterectomy: feasibility and technique. Gynecol Oncol 121: 605–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gil-Ibáñez B, Díaz-Feijoo B, Pérez-Benavente A, et al. (2013) Nerve sparing technique in robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy: results. Int J Med Robot 9: 339–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Narducci F, Collinet P, Merlot B, et al. (2013) Benefit of robotassisted laparoscopy in nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: urinary morbidity in early cervical cancer. Surg Endosc 27: 1237–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Chong GO, Lee YH, Hong DG, et al. (2013) Robot versus laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a comparison of the intraoperative and perioperative results of a single surgeon’s initial experience. Int J Gynecol Cancer 23: 1145–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Magrina JF, Magtibay PM (2012) Robotic nerve-sparing radical parametrectomy: feasibility and technique. Int J Med Robot 8: 206–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rossi EC, Ivanova A, Boggess JF, (2012) Robotically-assisted fluorescence-guided lymph node mapping with ICG for gynecologic malignancies: a feasibility study. Gynecol Oncol 124: 78–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Jewell EL, Huang JJ, Abu-Rustum NR, et al. (2014) Detection of sentinel lymph nodes in minimally invasive surgery using indocyanine green and near-infrared fluorescence imaging for uterine and cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 133: 274–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Plante M, Touhami O, Trinh XB, et al. (2015) Sentinel node mapping with indocyanine green and endoscopic near-infrared fluorescence imaging in endometrial cancer. A pilot study and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 137: 443–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Imboden S, Papadia A, Nauwerk M, et al. (2015) Lymph node mapping in patients with cervical cancer undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 22: 4198–4203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Buda A, Crivellaro C, Elisei F, et al. (2016) Impact of indocyanine green for sentinel lymph node mapping in early stage endometrial and cervical cancer: comparison with conventional radiotracer 99mTc and/or blue dye. Ann Surg Oncol 2015 [Epub ahead of print]

    Google Scholar 

  41. Siesto G, Romano F, Fiamengo B, et al. (2016) Sentinel node mapping using indocyanine green and near-infrared fluorescence imaging technology for uterine malignancies: preliminary experience with the Da Vinci Xi system. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23: 470–1 (doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.12.013. [Epub 2016 Jan 6])

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Classe JM, Rauch P, Rodier JF, et al. (2006) Surgery after concurrent chemoradiotherapy and brachytherapy for the treatment of advanced cervical cancer: morbidity and outcome: results of a multicenter study of the GCCLCC (Groupe des chirurgiens de centre de lutte contre le cancer). Gynecol Oncol 102: 523–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Ferron G, Querleu D, Martel P, et al. (2006) Laparoscopyassisted vaginal pelvic exenteration. Gynecol Oncol 100: 551–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lambaudie E, Narducci F, Leblanc E, et al. (2010) Roboticallyassisted laparoscopic anterior pelvic exenteration for recurrent cervical cancer: report of three first cases. Gynecol Oncol 116: 582–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Davis MA, Adams S, Eun D, et al. (2010) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic exenteration in recurrent cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202: 663.e1

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lim PC (2009) Robotic assisted total pelvic exenteration: a case report. Gynecol Oncol 115: 310–1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Jauffret C, Lambaudie E, Bannier M, et al. (2011) Robot-assisted laparoscopy in the management of recurrent pelvic cancer. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 39: 674–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Puntambekar S, Lawande A, Desai R, et al. (2014) Initial experience of robotic anterior pelvic exenteration at a single institute. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 126: 41–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Houvenaeghel G, Ghouti L, Moutardier V, et al. (2005) Rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap in radical oncopelvic surgery: a safe and useful procedure. Eur J Surg Oncol 31: 1185–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Rabinovich A (2016) Robotic surgery for ovarian cancers: individualization of the surgical approach to select ovarian cancer patients. Int J Med Robot (doi: 10.1002/rcs.1684. [Epub ahead of print])

    Google Scholar 

  51. Al Rawahi T, Lopes AD, Bristow RE, et al. (2013) Surgical cytoreduction for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 28: CD008765

    Google Scholar 

  52. Elattar A, Bryant A, Winter-Roach BA, et al. (2011) Optimal primary surgical treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10: CD007565.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Sinno AK, Fader AN (2014) Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology. Fertil Steril 102: 922–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Feuer GA, Lakhi N, Barker J, et al. (2013) Perioperative and clinical outcomes in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer using a robotic or abdominal approach. Gynecol Oncol 131: 520–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Chen CH, Chiu LH, Chen HH, et al. (2016) Comparison of robotic approach, laparoscopic approach and laparotomy in treating epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Med Robot (doi: 10.1002/rcs.1655. [Epub ahead of print])

    Google Scholar 

  56. Magrina JF, Zanagnolo V, Noble BN, et al. (2011) Robotic approach for ovarian cancer: perioperative and survival results and comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 121: 100–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Escobar PF, Levinson KL, Magrina J, et al. (2014) Feasibility and perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted surgery in the management of recurrent ovarian cancer: a multi-institutional study. Gynecol Oncol 134: 253–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Magrina JF, Cetta RL, Chang YH, et al. (2013) Analysis of secondary cytoreduction for recurrent ovarian cancer by robotics, laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 129: 336–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Minig L, Padilla Iserte P, Zorrero C, et al. (2016) Robotic surgery in women with ovarian cancer: surgical technique and evidence of clinical outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23: 309–16 (doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.10.014. [Epub 2015 Nov 10])

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Narducci F, Lambaudie E (2015) Extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy by robot-assisted laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology. Int J Gynecol Cancer 25: 1494–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Lowery WJ, Leath CA, Robinson RD (2012) Robotic surgery applications in the management of gynecologic malignancies. J Surg Oncol 105: 481–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Fastrez M, Goffin F, Vergote I, et al. (2013) Multi-center experience of robot-assisted laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy for staging of locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 92: 895–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Lambaudie E, Narducci F, Leblanc E, et al. (2012) Roboticallyassisted laparoscopy for para-aortic lymphadenectomy: technical description and results of an initial experience. Surg Endosc 26: 2430–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Vergote I, Pouseele B, VanGorp T, et al. (2008) Robotic retroperitoneal lower para-aortic lymphadenectomy in cervical carcinoma first report on the technique used in 5 patients. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 87: 783–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Magrina JF, Kho R, Montero RP, et al. (2009) Robotic extraperitoneal aortic lymphadenectomy: development of a technique. Gynecol Oncol 113: 32–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Bats AS, Mimouni M (2014) Robotic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecological cancer Int J Gynecol Cancer 24: 1486–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Tinelli R, Malzoni M, Cosentino F, et al. (2011) Robotics versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol 18: 2622–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Wisner KP, Gupta S, Ahmad S, et al. (2015) Indications and techniques for robotic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic oncology. J Surg Oncol 112: 782–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Hudry D, Ahmad S, Zanagnolo V, et al. (2015) Roboticallyassisted para-aortic lymphadenectomy: surgical results — a cohort study of 487 patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer 25: 504–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Clinique de gynécologie, hôpital Jeanne-de-Flandre, université de Lille-Nord-de-France, F-59037, Lille, France

    L. Bougherara, E. Arsène, H. Azaïs & P. Collinet

  2. Service de chirurgie oncologique, 2, institut Paoli-Calmettes, F-13009, Marseille, France

    G. Blache, C. Jauffret, C. Laplane, G. Atrous, S. Knight, G. Houvenaeghel & E. Lambaudie

  3. Département de chirurgie oncologique gynécologique, centre Oscar-Lambret, université de Lille-Nord-de-France, F-59037, Lille, France

    D. Hudry, L. Bresson, A. Kakkos, F. Narducci & E. Leblanc

  4. Centre de recherche en cancérologie de Marseille (CRCM), F-13009, Marseille, France

    G. Houvenaeghel & E. Lambaudie

  5. Université d’Aix-Marseille, F-13284, Marseille, France

    G. Houvenaeghel & E. Lambaudie

  6. Chirurgie cancérologique gynécologique et du sein, Assistance publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, F-75015, Paris, France

    A.-S. Bats & F. Lécuru

  7. Sorbonne Paris-Cité, faculté de médecine, université Paris-Descartes, F-75006, Paris, France

    A.-S. Bats & F. Lécuru

  8. Inserm UMR-S 1147, université Paris-Descartes, F-75006, Paris, France

    A.-S. Bats

  9. Inserm UMR-S 1124, université Paris-Descartes, F-75006, Paris, France

    F. Lécuru

  10. CRAN, UMR 7039, université de Lorraine, CNRS, F-54506, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France

    F. Marchal

  11. Département de chirurgie, institut de cancérologie de Lorraine, F-54519, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France

    F. Marchal

Authors
  1. L. Bougherara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. Blache
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. E. Arsène
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. C. Jauffret
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. H. Azaïs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. C. Laplane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. D. Hudry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. G. Atrous
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. S. Knight
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. L. Bresson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. A. Kakkos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. F. Narducci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. E. Leblanc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. G. Houvenaeghel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. A.-S. Bats
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. F. Lécuru
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. P. Collinet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. F. Marchal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. E. Lambaudie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Marchal.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bougherara, L., Blache, G., Arsène, E. et al. La chirurgie robotique en oncogynécologie. Oncologie 18, 287–297 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10269-016-2627-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10269-016-2627-3

Mots clés

Keywords

Search

Navigation