Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of the effect of different desensitizers on pulpal blood flow after full crown preparation using laser Doppler flowmetry: a randomized clinical trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Odontology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the effect of Teethmate, Bifluoride 12, and Copal Varnish on the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity and the pulpal blood flow using laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) after full crown preparations. Eighteen patients with 42 teeth with dentine hypersensitivity after full crown preparations were randomly treated with Teethmate, Bifluoride 12, and Copal Varnish. Dentine hypersensitivity was measured using a visual analog scale (VAS) and Schiff air index (SAI). LDF was used to assess the pulpal blood flow and results were recorded in perfusion units (PU). All measurements were performed at baseline, 5 min, 7 days, and 1 month after the application of desensitizers. Data were statistically analyzed by Wilcoxon and two-way ANOVA tests (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the tested desensitizers regarding VAS and PU values. VAS values decreased significantly at 7 days and 1 month after the application of desensitizers compared to baseline in all groups. The decrease in PU values significantly differed only in the Copal Varnish group at 5 min and 7 days after the application of the desensitizer (p < 0.05). A statistically significant difference was found between different times regarding SAI scores in all groups (p < 0.05). Teethmate, Bifluoride 12, and Copal Varnish showed similar effectiveness on dentine hypersensitivity and pulpal blood flow. Long-term clinical trials with larger sample sizes and histological studies are needed to evaluate their impacts on pulpal status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data is available on request from the authors.

References

  1. Orchardson R, Collins WJ. Clinical features of hypersensitive teeth. Br Dent J. 1987;162:253–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim SY, Kim EJ, Kim DS, et al. The evaluation of dentinal tubule occlusion by desensitizing agents: a real-time measurement of dentinal fluid flow rate and scanning electron microscopy. Oper Dent. 2013;38:419–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Davis GR, Tayeb RA, Seymour KG, et al. Quantification of residual dentine thickness following crown preparation. J Dent. 2012;40:571–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Richardson D, Tao L, Pashley DH. Dentin permeability: effects of crown preparation. Int J Prosthodont. 1991;4:219–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bagis B, Atilla P, Cakar N, et al. Immunohistochemical evaluation of endothelial cell adhesion molecules in human dental pulp: effects of tooth preparation and adhesive application. Arch Oral Biol. 2007;52:705–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sayed ME, Dewan H, Kharaf R, et al. Efficacy of three commercially available desensitizers in reducing post-operative sensitivity following composite restorations: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Polymers (Basel). 2022;14:1417.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rajnekar R, Mankar N, Nikhade P, et al. Clinical efficacy of two different desensitizers in reducing postoperative sensitivity following composite restorations. Cureus. 2022;14: e25977.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Tolentino AB, Zeola LF, Fernandes MRU, et al. Photobiomodulation therapy and 3% potassium nitrate gel as treatment of cervical dentin hypersensitivity: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26:6985–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Mosquim V, Caracho RA, Zabeu GS, et al. Resin-based materials to control human dentin permeability under erosive conditions in vitro: a hydraulic conductance, confocal microscopy and FTIR study. Dent Mater. 2022;38:1669–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. da Silva A, Deschamps Muniz RP, Almeida Lago MC, et al. Clinical efficacy of mouthwashes with potassium salts in the treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oper Dent. 2023;48:33–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Usai P, Campanella V, Sotgiu G, et al. Effectiveness of calcium phosphate desensitising agents in dental hypersensitivity over 24 weeks of clinical evaluation. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2019;9:1748.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Saraç D, Külünk S, Saraç YS, et al. Effect of fluoride-containing desensitizing agents on the bond strength of resin-based cements to dentin. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17:495–500.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Maghrabi AA. Effect of dentin sealers on postoperative sensitivity of complete cast crowns cemented with glass ionomer cement. J Prosthodont. 2011;20:385–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jiang R, Xu Y, Wang F, et al. Effectiveness and cytotoxicity of two desensitizing agents: a dentin permeability measurement and dentin barrier testing in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22:391.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Wiegand A, Buchholz K, Werner C, et al. In vitro cytotoxicity of different desensitizers under simulated pulpal flow conditions. J Adhes Dent. 2008;10:227–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Miron M, Lungeanu D, Ciora E, et al. Using laser-doppler flowmetry to evaluate the therapeutic response in dentin hypersensitivity. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:8787.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Adam M. ‘Cold is gold’? The diagnostic accuracy of sensibility and vitality testing techniques. Evid Based Dent. 2022;23:137.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Karayilmaz H, Kirzioğlu Z. Comparison of the reliability of laser Doppler flowmetry, pulse oximetry and electric pulp tester in assessing the pulp vitality of human teeth. J Oral Rehabil. 2011;38:340–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gopikrishna V, Tinagupta K, Kandaswamy D. Evaluation of efficacy of a new custom-made pulse oximeter dental probe in comparison with the electrical and thermal tests for assessing pulp vitality. J Endod. 2007;33:411–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schiff T, Dotson M, Cohen S, et al. Efficacy of a dentifrice containing potassium nitrate, soluble pyrophosphate, PVM/MA copolymer, and sodium fluoride on dentinal hypersensitivity: a twelve-week clinical study. J Clin Dent. 1994;5(Spec No):87–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Butera A, Gallo S, Pascadopoli M, et al. Home oral care with biomimetic hydroxyapatite vs. conventional fluoridated toothpaste for the remineralization and desensitizing of white spot lesions: randomized clinical trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:8676.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Machado AC, Maximiano V, Yoshida ML, et al. Efficacy of a calcium-phosphate/fluoride varnish and ionomeric sealant on cervical dentin hypersensitivity: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study. J Oral Rehabil. 2022;49:62–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shetty R, Bhat AN, Mehta D, et al. Effect of a calcium phosphate desensitizer on pre- and postcementation sensitivity of teeth prepared for full-coverage restorations: a randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Study. Int J Prosthodont. 2017;30:38–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Forouzande M, Rezaei-Soufi L, Yarmohammadi E, et al. Effect of sodium fluoride varnish, Gluma, and Er, Cr:YSGG laser in dentin hypersensitivity treatment: a 6-month clinical trial. Lasers Med Sci. 2022;37:2989–97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Savitha K, Manoharan PS, Balaji J, et al. Effect of silver diamine fluoride, potassium nitrate, and glutaraldehyde in reducing the post vital tooth preparation hypersensitivity: a randomized controlled trial. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2022;22:143–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Jackson CR, Skidmore AE, Rice RT. Pulpal evaluation of teeth restored with fixed prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;67:323–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rosenstiel SF, Rashid RG. Postcementation hypersensitivity: scientific data versus dentists’ perceptions. J Prosthodont. 2003;12:73–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Markowitz K, Moynihan M, Liu M, et al. Biologic properties of eugenol and zinc oxide-eugenol. A clinically oriented review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1992;73:729–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kara HB, Cakan U, Yilmaz B, et al. Efficacy of diode laser and gluma on post-preparation sensitivity: a randomized split-mouth clinical study. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2016;28:405–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Abdollahi A, Jalalian E. Effectiveness of two desensitizer materials, potassium nitrate and fluoride varnish in relieving hypersensitivity after crown preparation. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019;20:489–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bodian CA, Freedman G, Hossain S, et al. The visual analog scale for pain: clinical significance in postoperative patients. Anesthesiology. 2001;95:1356–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rocha MOC, Cruz A, Santos DO, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of assessment scales of dentin hypersensitivity—an accuracy study. Braz Oral Res. 2020;34: e043.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Alghaithy RA, Qualtrough AJ. Pulp sensibility and vitality tests for diagnosing pulpal health in permanent teeth: a critical review. Int Endod J. 2017;50:135–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhou J, Chiba A, Scheffel DL, et al. Effects of a dicalcium and tetracalcium phosphate-based desensitizer on in vitro dentin permeability. PLoS One. 2016;11: e0158400.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Kerimova L, Kiremitci A. Effectiveness of two desensitizing products: a 6-month randomized clinical, split-mouth study. Am J Dent. 2020;33:325–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bhandary S, Hegde M. A clinical comparison of in-office management of dentin hypersensitivity in a short term treatment period. Int J Biomed Adv Res. 2012;3:169–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Thrash WJ, Jones DL, Dodds WJ. Effect of a fluoride solution on dentinal hypersensitivity. Am J Dent. 1992;5:299–302.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Yates RJ, Newcombe RG, Addy M. Dentine hypersensitivity: a randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of a fluoride-sensitive teeth mouthrinse. J Clin Periodontol. 2004;31:885–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Saba K, Maxood A, Abdullah S, et al. Comparison of frequency of post operative sensitivity in amalgam restorations using copal varnish and dentin adhesive liner. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2018;30:163–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bembi S, Bembi NN, Sood A, et al. To evaluate the effect of different adhesive materials on the microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: an in vitro study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2012;5:185–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Baratieri LN, Machado A, Van Noort R, et al. Effect of pulp protection technique on the clinical performance of amalgam restorations: three-year results. Oper Dent. 2002;27:319–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sukapattee M, Wanachantararak S, Sirimaharaj V, et al. Effect of full crown preparation on pulpal blood flow in man. Arch Oral Biol. 2016;70:111–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sıla Nur Usta.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Uğur-Aydın, Z., Kılınç, H., Akbaş, Y. et al. Evaluation of the effect of different desensitizers on pulpal blood flow after full crown preparation using laser Doppler flowmetry: a randomized clinical trial. Odontology 112, 272–278 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-023-00828-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-023-00828-7

Keywords

Navigation