Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Antimicrobial effects of agitational irrigation on single- and multispecies biofilms in dentin canals

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Odontology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the antibacterial effects of different agitation devices on single- and multispecies biofilms in dentin canals using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Dentin blocks were prepared from human root dentin. Enterococcus faecalis and multiple species were introduced into the dentinal tubules via centrifugation and incubation. Two infected dentin samples were placed at 8 and 16 mm in a customized model. Samples were randomly divided into eight groups according to the agitation device used: syringe needle irrigation, EndoActivator, passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), and EDDY, at 2.5% or 6% NaOCl concentrations. The samples were stained and observed using CLSM. Statistical analysis was performed using an independent sample t test and analysis of variance. Linear models were used to assess the joint impact of the experimental groups on the proportion of biofilms killed. No significant differences were observed between the killing rates of the single- and multispecies biofilms. Both concentrations of NaOCl significantly increased the percentage of dead bacteria compared with the control. Biofilms in dentin tubules was more effectively killed when NaOCl was agitated; however, the difference between PUI and EDDY was not significant. Significantly more bacteria were killed in dentin blocks placed at 8 mm than at 16 mm (p < 0.05). In conclusion, EDDY was as effective as PUI when combined with NaOCl. However, the apical portion, which had a low antimicrobial efficiency, remains a concern. Mechanical instrumentation is incapable of completely eradicating bacteria, and additional research is required to improve the efficacy of root canal disinfection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nair PNR. On the causes of persistent apical periodontitis: a review. Int Endod J. 2006;39:249–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kakehashi S, Stanley HR, Fitzgerald RJ. The effects of surgical exposures of dental pulps in germfree and conventional laboratory rats. J South Calif Dent Assoc. 1966;34:449–51.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Siren EK, Haapasalo MPP, Waltimo TMT, Orstavik D. In vitro antibacterial effect of calcium hydroxide combined with chlorhexidine or iodine potassium iodide on enterococcus faecalis. Eur J Oral Sci. 2004;112:326–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Haapasalo M, Shen Y, Qian W, Gao Y. Irrigation in endodontics. Dent Clin North Am. 2010;54:291–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chavez de Paz LE, Dahlen G, Molander A, et al. Bacteria recovered from teeth with apical periodontitis after antimicrobial endodontic treatment. Int Endod J. 2003;36:500–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Siqueira JF, Rôças IN, Ricucci D. Biofilms in endodontic infection. Endod Topics. 2010;22:33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stojicic S, Shen Y, Haapasalo M. Effect of the source of biofilm bacteria, level of biofilm maturation, and type of disinfecting agent on the susceptibility of biofilm bacteria to antibacterial agents. J Endod. 2013;39:473–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Peters OA, Peters CI, Schönenberger K, et al. ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: effects of canal anatomy on final shape analysed by micro CT. Int Endod J. 2003;36:86–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosenfeld EF, James GA, Burch BS. Vital pulp tissue response to sodium hypochlorite. J Endod. 1978;4:140–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Du T, Wang Z, Shen Y, et al. Combined antibacterial effect of sodium hypochlorite and root canal sealers against enterococcus faecalis biofilms in dentin canals. J Endod. 2015;41:1294–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ma J, Wang Z, Shen Y, et al. A new noninvasive model to study the effectiveness of dentin disinfection by using confocal laser scanning microscopy. J Endod. 2011;37:1380–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang Y, Shen Y, Wang Z, et al. Evaluation of the susceptibility of multispecies biofilms in dentinal tubules to disinfecting solutions. J Endod. 2016;42:1246–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu H, Li H, Zhang L, et al. In vitro evaluation of the antibacterial effect of four root canal sealers on dental biofilms. Clin Oral Investig. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04399-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gu L, Kim JR, Ling J, et al. Review of contemporary irrigant agitation techniques and devices. J Endod. 2009;35:791–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ruddle CJ. Endodontic disinfection: tsunami irrigation. Saudi Endod J. 2015;5:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Caron G. Cleaning efficiency of the apical millimeters of curved canals using three different modalities of irrigant activation: an SEM study. Paris: Paris VII University; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Neuhaus KW, Liebi M, Stauffacher S, et al. Antibacterial efficacy of a new sonic irrigation device for root canal disinfection. J Endod. 2016;42:1799–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ahmad M, Pitt Ford TR, Crum LA. Ultrasonic debridement of root canals: acoustic streaming and its possible role. J Endod. 1987;13:490–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Peciuliene V, Balciuniene I, Eriksen HM, et al. Isolation of Enterococcus faecalis in previously root-filled canals in a Lithuanian population. J Endod. 2000;26:593–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Conde AJ, Estevez R, Loroño G, Valencia de Pablo Ó, Rossi-Fedele G, Cisneros R. Effect of sonic and ultrasonic activation on organic tissue dissolution from simulated grooves in root canals using sodium hypochlorite and EDTA. Int Endod J. 2017;50:976–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Donnermeyer D, Wyrsch H, Bürklein S, Schäfer E. Removal of calcium hydroxide from artificial grooves in straight root canals: sonic activation using EDDY versus passive ultrasonic irrigation and XPendo Finisher. J Endod. 2019;45:322–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Plotino G, Colangeli M, Özyürek T, et al. Evaluation of smear layer and debris removal by stepwise intraoperative activation (SIA) of sodium hypochlorite. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25:237–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zeng C, Everett J, Sidow S, et al. In vitro evaluation of efficacy of two endodontic sonic-powered irrigant agitation systems in killing single-species intracanal biofilms. J Dent. 2021;115: 103859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Matsuo T, Shirakami T, Ozaki K, et al. An immunohistological study of the localization of bacteria invading root pulpal walls of teeth with periapical lesions. J Endod. 2003;29:194–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Haapasalo M, Ørstavik D. In vitro infection and disinfection of dentinal tubules. J Dent Res. 1987;66:1375–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN, Lopes HP. Patterns of microbial colonization in primary root canal infections. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;93:174–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Qian Z, Sagers RD, Pitt WG. Investigation of the mechanism of the bioacoustic effect. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999;44:198–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shen Y, Stojicic S, Qian W, Olsen I, Haapasalo M. The synergistic antimicrobial effect by mechanical agitation and two chlorhexidine preparations on biofilm bacteria. J Endod. 2010;36:100–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Swimberghe RCD, De Clercq A, De Moor RJG, et al. Efficacy of sonically, ultrasonically and laser-activated irrigation in removing a biofilm-mimicking hydrogel from an isthmus model. Int Endod J. 2019;52:515–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang Z, Shen Y, Haapasalo M. Dynamics of dissolution, killing, and inhibition of dental plaque biofilm. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:964. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang Z, Shen Y, Ma J, et al. The effect of detergents on the antibacterial activity of disinfecting solutions in dentin. J Endod. 2012;38:948–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang Z, Shen Y, Haapasalo M. Effect of smear layer against disinfection protocols on Enterococcus faecalis–infected dentin. J Endod. 2013;39:1395–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Canadian Academy of Endodontics and the authors deny any conflicts of interest related to this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yuan Gao or Ya Shen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Zuhair, H., Su, Z., Liu, H. et al. Antimicrobial effects of agitational irrigation on single- and multispecies biofilms in dentin canals. Odontology 111, 49–56 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-022-00719-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-022-00719-3

Keywords

Navigation