Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Color difference of composite resins after cementation with different shades of resin luting cement

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Odontology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the color difference of nanohybrid and ormocer-based composite resins with different thicknesses when 4 different shades of resin luting cement were used. 56 disc specimens of each composite resin (Aelite aesthetic enamel, Ceram-X mono) with 0.5 and 1 mm thicknesses were fabricated. Baseline color measurements were performed using a clinical spectrophotometer. The specimens of each thicknesses of each resin were randomly divided into 4 groups according to the shades of resin luting cement (white/A1, yellow/universal/A3, transparent and white opaque) (n = 7). Mixed resin cement was applied onto the resin specimens using a Teflon mold in 0.1 mm thickness. Color measurements of cemented composite resin specimens were repeated and color difference (∆E) between baseline and after cementation measurements was calculated. ANOVA and Tukey’s test were used for statistical analysis. The opaque shade had significantly increased ∆E values as compared to the other shades (p < 0.05). For all shades except white opaque in both thicknesses, ∆E values of aelite aesthetic enamel were higher as compared to Ceram-X mono. There is no significant difference between 2 thicknesses for both resins in terms of ∆E values. The shade of resin cement and the type of the resin affected the final color; however, the thickness of composite resin had no influence on the final color of restoration. Selecting the shade of resin luting cement before cementation of indirect composite laminate restoration is important to achieve final color match.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fahl JN. The direct/indirect composite resin veneers: a case report. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1996;8:627–38.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sadowsky SJ. An overview of treatment considerations for esthetic restorations: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;96:433–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Alabdulwahhab BM, AlShethry MA, AlMoneef MA, AlManie MA, AlMaziad MM, AlOkla MS. The effect of dental adhesive on final color match of direct laminate veneer (DLV). In vitro study. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015;27:307–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Coelho-de-Souza FH, Gonçalves DS, Sales MP, Erhardt MC, Corrêa MB, Opdam NJ, et al. Direct anterior composite veneers in vital and non-vital teeth: a retrospective clinical evaluation. J Dent. 2015;43:1330–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Re D, Augusti G, Amato M, Riva G, Augusti D. Esthetic rehabilitation of anterior teeth with laminates composite veneers. Case Rep Dent. 2014;2014:849273.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Ferraz Caneppele TM, Rocha DM, Màximo Araujo MA, Valera MC, Salazar Marocho SM. Abrasion resistance of direct and indirect resins as a function of a sealant veneer. Indian J Dent Res. 2014;25:381–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Turgut S, Bagis B. Effect of resin cement and ceramic thickness on final color of laminate veneers: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;109:179–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Alqahtani MQ, Aljurais RM, Alshaafi MM. The effects of different shades of resin luting cement on the color of ceramic veneers. Dent Mater J. 2012;31:354–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. Four-year clinical evaluation of Class II nano-hybrid resin composite restorations bonded with a one-step self-etch and a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive. J Dent. 2011;39:16–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Davis N. A nanotechnology composite. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2003;24:662 (665-667, 669-670).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kalra S, Singh A, Gupta M, Chadha V. Ormocer: an aesthetic direct restorative material; an in vitro study comparing the marginal sealing ability of organically modified ceramics and a hybrid composite using an ormocer-based bonding agent and a conventional fifth-generation bonding agent. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2012;3:48–53.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Attar N, Tam LE, McComb D. Mechanical and physical properties of contemporary dental luting agents. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:127–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ozturk E, Chiang YC, Cosgun E, Bolay Ş, Hickel R, Ilie N. Effect of resin shades on opacity of ceramic veneers and polymerization efficiency through ceramics. J Dent. 2013;41:e8–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Turgut S, Bagis B. Colour stability of laminate veneers: an in vitro study. J Dent. 2011;39:e57–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ahn JS, Lee YK. Difference in the translucency of all-ceramics by the illuminant. Dent Mater. 2008;24:1539–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ruyter IE, Nilner K, Moller B. Color stability of dental composite resin materials for crown and bridge veneers. Dent Mater. 1987;3:246–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee YK, Yu B, Lee SH, Cho MS, Lee CY, Lim HN. Variation in instrument-based color coordinates of esthetic restorative materials by measurement method-a review. Dent Mater. 2010;26:1098–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Paul SJ, Peter A, Rodoni L, Pietrobon N. Conventional visual vs spectrophotometric shade taking for porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns: a clinical comparison. Int J Periodont Restor Dent. 2004;24:222–31.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Judeh A, Al-Wahadni A. A comparison between conventional visual and spectrophotometric methods for shade selection. Quintessence Int. 2000;40:e69–79.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Paul S, Peter A, Pietrobon N, Hämmerle CH. Visual and spectrophotometric shade analysis of human teeth. J Dent Res. 2002;81:578–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Johnston WM. Color measurement in dentistry. J Dent. 2009;37:e2–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kuehni RG, Marcus RT. An experiment in visual scaling of small color differences. Color Res Appl. 1979;4:83–91.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ragain JC Jr, Johnston WM. Minimum color differences for discriminating mismatch between composite and tooth color. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2001;13:41–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Johnston WM, Kao EC. Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry. J Dent Res. 1989;68:819–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Peutzfeldt A. Dual-cure resin cements: in vitro wear and effect of quantity of remaining double bonds, filler volume, and light curing. Acta Odontol Scand. 1995;53:29–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Vichi A, Ferrari M, Davidson CL. Influence of ceramic and cement thickness on the masking of various types of opaque posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83:412–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Li Q, Yu H, Wang YN. Spectrophotometric evaluation of the optical influence of core build-up composites on all-ceramic materials. Dent Mater. 2009;25:158–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Garber D. Porcelain laminate veneers: ten years later. Part I: tooth preparation. J Esthet Dent. 1993;5:56–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Magne P, Versluis A, Douglas WH. Effect of luting composite shrinkage and thermal loads on the stress distribution in porcelain laminate veneers. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;81:335–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chang J, Da Silva JD, Sakai M, Kristiansen J, Ishikawa-Nagai S. The optical effect of composite luting cement on all ceramic crowns. J Dent. 2009;37:937–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Xing W, Jiang T, Ma X, Liang S, Wang Z, Sa Y, et al. Evaluation of the esthetic effect of resin cements and try-in pastes on ceromer veneers. J Dent. 2010;38:e87–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Schulze KA, Marshall SJ, Gansky SA, Marshall GW. Color stability and hardness in dental composites after accelerated aging. Dent Mater. 2003;19:612–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lee YK. Influence of scattering/absorption characteristics on the color of resin composites. Dent Mater. 2007;23:124–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lim YK, Lee YK, Lim BS, Rhee SH, Yang HC. Influence of filler distribution on the color parameters of experimental resin composites. Dent Mater. 2008;24:67–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mikhail SS, Schricker SR, Azer SS, Brantley WA, Johnston WM. Optical characteristics of contemporary dental composite resin materials. J Dent. 2013;41:771–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Miyagawa Y, Powers JM, O’Brien WJ. Optical properties of direct restorative materials. J Dent Res. 1981;60:890–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Shortall AC, Palin WM, Burtscher P. Refractive index mismatch and monomer reactivity influence composite curing depth. J Dent Res. 2008;87:84–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S, Cengiz E, Ulusoy N, Ozak ST, Yuksel E. The effect of home-bleaching application on the color and translucency of five resin composites. J Dent. 2013;41:e70–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Balderamos LP, O’Keefe KL, Powers JM. Color accuracy of resin cements and try-in pastes. Int J Prosthodont. 1997;10:111–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Terzioğlu H, Yilmaz B, Yurdukoru B. The effect of different shades of specific luting agents and IPS empress ceramic thickness on overall color. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent. 2009;29:499–505.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kürklü D, Azer SS, Yilmaz B, Johnston WM. Porcelain thickness and cement shade effects on the colour and translucency of porcelain veneering materials. J Dent. 2013;41:1043–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ferraris F, Diamantopoulou S, Acunzo R, Alcidi R. Influence of enamel composite thickness on value, chroma and translucency of a high and a nonhigh refractive index resin composite. Int J Esthet Dent. 2014;9:382–401.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Dr. Hasan Guney Yilmaz for statistical analyses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey

    Esra Cengiz

  2. Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Near East University, Mersin 10, Turkey

    Sevcan Kurtulmus-Yilmaz & Huseyin Aktore

  3. Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Near East University, Mersin 10, Turkey

    Izgen Karakaya

Authors
  1. Esra Cengiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sevcan Kurtulmus-Yilmaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Izgen Karakaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Huseyin Aktore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Esra Cengiz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cengiz, E., Kurtulmus-Yilmaz, S., Karakaya, I. et al. Color difference of composite resins after cementation with different shades of resin luting cement. Odontology 106, 181–186 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-017-0311-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-017-0311-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation