Skip to main content
Log in

Structural mechanics modeling reveals stress-adaptive features of cutaneous scars

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The scar is a predominant outcome of adult mammalian wound healing despite being associated with partial function loss. Here in this paper, we have described the structure of a full-thickness normal scar as a “di-fork” with dual biomechanical compartments using in vivo and ex vivo experiments. We used structural mechanics simulations to model the deformation fields computationally and stress distribution in the scar in response to external forces. Despite its loss of tissue components, we have found that the scar has stress-adaptive features that cushion the underlying tissues from external mechanical impacts. Thus, this new finding can motivate research to understand the biomechanical advantages of a scar in maintaining the primary function of the skin, i.e., mechanical barrier despite permanent loss of some tissues and specialized functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  • Aarabi S, Bhatt KA, Shi Y, Paterno J, Chang EI, Loh SA, Holmes JW, Longaker MT, Yee H, Gurtner GC (2007) Mechanical load initiates hypertrophic scar formation through decreased cellular apoptosis. FASEB J 21(12):3250–3261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akaishi S, Akimoto M, Ogawa R, Hyakusoku H (2008) The relationship between keloid growth pattern and stretching tension: visual analysis using the finite element method. Ann Plast Surg 60(4):445–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akhtar R, Schwarzer N, Sherratt M, Watson R, Graham H, Trafford A, Mummery P, Derby B (2009) Nanoindentation of histological specimens: mapping the elastic properties of soft tissues. J Mater Res 24(3):638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buganza-Tepole A, Steinberg JP, Kuhl E, Gosain AK (2014) Application of finite element modeling to optimize flap design with tissue expansion. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(4):785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahalane R, Walsh M (2020) Nanoindentation of calcified and non-calcified components of atherosclerotic tissues. Experimental mechanics. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, Florida, United States, pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Chanda A, Ruchti T, Unnikrishnan V (2018) Computational modeling of wound suture: a review. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng 11:165–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Y-T, Cheng C-M (2005) Relationships between initial unloading slope, contact depth, and mechanical properties for conical indentation in linear viscoelastic solids. J Mater Res 20(4):1046–1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb M, Chen Y, Underwood R, Usui M, Olerud J, Li X (2006) Noninvasive assessment of cutaneous wound healing using ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography. J Biomed Opt 11(6):064002–064002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans N, Oreffo R, Healy E, Thurner P, Man Y (2013) Epithelial mechanobiology, skin wound healing, and the stem cell niche. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 28:397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabbrocini G, Annunziata M, D’arco V, De Vita V, Lodi G, Mauriello M, Pastore F, Monfrecola G (2010) Acne scars: pathogenesis, classification and treatment. Dermatology research and practice

  • Fan Y, Ma Q, Xin S, Peng R, Kang H (2020) Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of supercontinuum laser-induced cutaneous thermal injuries and their repair with oct images. Lasers in surgery and medicine. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, Florida, United States

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gauglitz GG, Korting HC, Pavicic T, Ruzicka T, Jeschke MG (2011) Hypertrophic scarring and keloids: pathomechanisms and current and emerging treatment strategies. Mol Med 17(1–2):113–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girard D, Laverdet B, Buhé V, Trouillas M, Ghazi K, Alexaline MM, Egles C, Misery L, Coulomb B, Lataillade J-J et al (2017) Biotechnological management of skin burn injuries: challenges and perspectives in wound healing and sensory recovery. Tissue Eng Part B: Rev 23(1):59–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golberg A, Villiger M, Khan S, Quinn KP, Lo WC, Bouma BE, Mihm MC Jr, Austen WG Jr, Yarmush ML (2016) Preventing scars after injury with partial irreversible electroporation. J Investig Dermatol 136:2297–2304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurtner GC, Werner S, Barrandon Y, Longaker MT (2008) Wound repair and regeneration. Nature 453(7193):314–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris TA, Gattu S, Propheter DC, Kuang Z, Bel S, Ruhn KA, Chara AL, Edwards M, Zhang C, Jo J-H et al (2019) Resistin-like molecule \(\alpha\) provides vitamin-a-dependent antimicrobial protection in the skin. Cell Host Microbe 25(6):777–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendriks J, Riesle J, Blitterswijk CAV (2010) Close dependence of fibroblast proliferation on collagen scaffold matrix stiffness. J Tissue Eng Regener Med 4(7):524–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hotchkiss S (1992) Skin as a xenobiotic metabolizing organ. Progress Drug Metab 13:217–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang H, Li Y, Luo X, Cheng X, Shi B, Li J (2018) Mechanical analyses of critical surgical maneuvers in the correction of cleft lip nasal deformity. PLoS ONE 13(4):e0195583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karimi A, Navidbakhsh M, Razaghi R (2014) Plaque and arterial vulnerability investigation in a three-layer atherosclerotic human coronary artery using computational fluid-structure interaction method. J Appl Phys 116(6):064701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee T, Turin SY, Gosain AK, Bilionis I, Tepole AB (2018) Propagation of material behavior uncertainty in a nonlinear finite element model of reconstructive surgery. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 17(6):1857–1873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Bhushan B (2002) A review of nanoindentation continuous stiffness measurement technique and its applications. Mater Charact 48(1):11–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Guan G, Reif R, Huang Z, Wang RK (2012) Determining elastic properties of skin by measuring surface waves from an impulse mechanical stimulus using phase-sensitive optical coherence tomography. J R Soc Interface 9(70):831–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang X, Boppart SA (2009) Biomechanical properties of in vivo human skin from dynamic optical coherence elastography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 57(4):953–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohd Hilmi AB, Halim AS, Jaafar H, Asiah AB, Hassan A (2013) Chitosan dermal substitute and chitosan skin substitute contribute to accelerated full-thickness wound healing in irradiated rats. BioMed research international. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, Florida, United States

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moore AL, Marshall CD, Barnes LA, Murphy MP, Ransom RC, Longaker MT (2018) Scarless wound healing: transitioning from fetal research to regenerative healing. Wiley Interdiscip Rev: Dev Biol 7(2):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1992) An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res 7(6):1564–1583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portnoy S, Siev-Ner I, Yizhar Z, Kristal A, Shabshin N, Gefen A (2009) Surgical and morphological factors that affect internal mechanical loads in soft tissues of the transtibial residuum. Ann Biomed Eng 37(12):2583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabkin SW (2017) Role of epicardial fat to buffer deformation and vibration in coronary arteries. Clin Med Rev Vasc Health 2017(9):0–0

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanelli M, Dini V (2009) Bioengineering techniques in wound assessment. Bioengineering research of chronic wounds. Springer, Berlin, pp 363–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanovsky AA (2014) Skin temperature: its role in thermoregulation. Acta Physiol 210(3):498–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stilwell N, Tabor D (1961) Elastic recovery of conical indentations. Proc Phys Soc 78(2):169

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Stroncek JD, Reichert WM (2008) Overview of wound healing in different tissue types Indwelling neural implants: strategies for contending with the in vivo environment. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, Florida, United States, pp 3–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Ugail H (2009) Partial differential equations for modelling wound geometry. Bioengineering research of chronic wounds. Springer, Berlin, pp 101–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermolen F, Javierre E (2009) A suite of continuum models for different aspects in wound healing. Bioengineering research of chronic wounds. Springer, Berlin, pp 127–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong VW, Akaishi S, Longaker MT, Gurtner GC (2011) Pushing back: wound mechanotransduction in repair and regeneration. J Investig Dermatol 131(11):2186–2196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zomer HD, Trentin AG (2018) Skin wound healing in humans and mice: challenges in translational research. J Dermatol Sci 90(1):3–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study and B. Ghosh were funded by SERB, Department of Science and Technology, Government of India (SB/S5/AB-01/2016, Dt-04.09.2018). The authors acknowledge Central Research Facility, IIT Kharagpur for providing nanoindentation facility. We created the diagrammatic figures of skin and scar using Biorender under academic license.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Biswajoy Ghosh.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghosh, B., Mandal, M., Mitra, P. et al. Structural mechanics modeling reveals stress-adaptive features of cutaneous scars. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 20, 371–377 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-020-01384-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-020-01384-7

Keywords

Navigation