Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prediction of brain deformations and risk of traumatic brain injury due to closed-head impact: quantitative analysis of the effects of boundary conditions and brain tissue constitutive model

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we investigate the effects of modelling choices for the brain–skull interface (layers of tissues between the brain and skull that determine boundary conditions for the brain) and the constitutive model of brain parenchyma on the brain responses under violent impact as predicted using computational biomechanics model. We used the head/brain model from Total HUman Model for Safety (THUMS)—extensively validated finite element model of the human body that has been applied in numerous injury biomechanics studies. The computations were conducted using a well-established nonlinear explicit dynamics finite element code LS-DYNA. We employed four approaches for modelling the brain–skull interface and four constitutive models for the brain tissue in the numerical simulations of the experiments on post-mortem human subjects exposed to violent impacts reported in the literature. The brain–skull interface models included direct representation of the brain meninges and cerebrospinal fluid, outer brain surface rigidly attached to the skull, frictionless sliding contact between the brain and skull, and a layer of spring-type cohesive elements between the brain and skull. We considered Ogden hyperviscoelastic, Mooney–Rivlin hyperviscoelastic, neo–Hookean hyperviscoelastic and linear viscoelastic constitutive models of the brain tissue. Our study indicates that the predicted deformations within the brain and related brain injury criteria are strongly affected by both the approach of modelling the brain–skull interface and the constitutive model of the brain parenchyma tissues. The results suggest that accurate prediction of deformations within the brain and risk of brain injury due to violent impact using computational biomechanics models may require representation of the meninges and subarachnoidal space with cerebrospinal fluid in the model and application of hyperviscoelastic (preferably Ogden-type) constitutive model for the brain tissue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Based on Hardy et al. (2001) and adapted from our recent paper (Wang et al. 2017)

Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrawal S, Wittek A, Joldes G, Bunt S, Miller K (2015) Mechanical properties of brain-skull interface in compression. In: Doyle B, Miller K, Wittek A, Nielsen PMF (eds) Computational biomechanics for medicine. Springer, New York, pp 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15503-6_8

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Bsharat AS, Hardy WN, Yang KH, Khalil TB, Tashman S, King AI (1999) Brain/skull relative displacement magnitude due to blunt head impact. In: Proceedings of the 1999 43rd stapp car crash conference, San Diego, CA, USA. SAE, Warrendale, PA, U.S.A, pp 321–332

  • Almeida CERd, Filho JLdS, Dourado JC, Gontijo PAM, Dellaretti MA, Costa BS (2016) Traumatic brain injury epidemiology in Brazil. World Neurosurg 87:540–547 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.10.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antona-Makoshi J (2013) Reanalysis of primate head impact experiments to clarify mild traumatic brain injury kinematics and thresholds. Dissertation, Chalmers University of Technology

  • Antona-Makoshi J (2015) Traumatic brain injuries: animal experiments and numerical simulations to support the development of a brain injury criterion. Dissertation, Chalmers University of Technology

  • Bandak FA, Zhang AX, Tannous RE, DiMasi F, Masiello P, Eppinger R (2001) SIMon: a simulated injury monitor; application to head injury assessment. In: International technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, p 7

  • Bathe K-J (2006) Finite element procedures. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bayly PV, Clayton EH, Genin GM (2012) Quantitative imaging methods for the development and validation of brain biomechanics models. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 14:369–396 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071811-150032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilston LE (2011) Brain tissue mechanical properties. Stud Mechanobiol Tissue Eng Biomater 3:69–89 10.1007/978-1-4419-9997-9\_4

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Claessens M, Sauren F, Wismans J (1997) Modeling of the human head under impact conditions: a parametric study. SAE Technical Paper: No. 973338. https://doi.org/10.4271/973338

  • Fahlstedt M, Halldin P, Alvarez VS, Kleiven S (2016) Influence of the body and neck on head kinematics and brain injury risk in bicycle accident situations. In: Proceedings of 2016 IRCOBI conference. International research council on biomechanics of injury (IRCOBI), Malaga, Spain, pp 459–478

  • Faul M, Xu L, Wald MM, Coronado V (2010) Traumatic brain injury in the United States: emergency department visits, hospitalizations and deaths 2002–2006 (blue book). National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Feng Y, Abney T, Okamoto R, Pless R, Genin G, Bayly PV (2010) Relative brain displacement and deformation during constrained mild frontal head impact. J R Soc Interface 7:1677–1688 10.1098/rsif.2010.0210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garlapati R et al (2014) More accurate neuronavigation data provided by biomechanical modeling instead of rigid registration. J Neurosurg 120:1477–1483 10.3171/2013.12.JNS131165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines DE, Harkey HL, Al-Mefty O (1993) The “subdural” space: a new look at an outdated concept. Neurosurgery 32:111–120 10.1227/00006123-199301000-00017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy WN (2007) Response of the human cadaver head to impact. Dissertation, Wayne State University

  • Hardy WN, Foster CD, Mason MJ, Yang KH, King AI, Tashman S (2001) Investigation of head injury mechanisms using neutral density technology and high-speed biplanar x-ray. Stapp Car Crash J 45:337–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez F et al (2015) Six degree-of-freedom measurements of human mild traumatic brain injury. Ann Biomed Eng 43:1918–1934 10.1007/s10439-015-1487-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho J, Kleiven S (2007) Dynamic response of the brain with vasculature: a three-dimensional computational study. J Biomech 40:3006–3012 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.02.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu J et al (2007) Intraoperative brain shift prediction using a 3D inhomogeneous patient-specific finite element model. J Neurosurg 106:164–169 10.3171/jns.2007.106.1.164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwamoto M, Nakahira Y, Kimpara H (2015) Development and validation of the total human model for safety (THUMS) toward further understanding of occupant injury mechanisms in precrash and during crash. Traffic Inj Prev 16(Suppl 1):S36 10.1080/15389588.2015.1015000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin X (2009) Biomechanical response and constitutive modeling of bovine pia-arachnoid complex. Dissertation, Wayne State University

  • Jin X, Yang KH, King AI (2011) Mechanical properties of bovine pia-arachnoid complex in shear. J Biomech 44:467–474 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.09.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin X, Mao H, Yang KH, King AI (2014) Constitutive modeling of pia-arachnoid complex. Ann Biomed Eng 42:812–821 10.1007/s10439-013-0948-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimpara H, Nakahira Y, Iwamoto M, Miki K, Ichihara K, Kawano S, Taguchi T (2006) Investigation of anteroposterior head-neck responses during severe frontal impacts using a brain-spinal cord complex FE model. Stapp Car Crash J 50:509–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiven S, Hardy WN (2002) Correlation of an FE model of the human head with local brain motion: consequences for injury prediction. Stapp Car Crash J 46:123–144

    Google Scholar 

  • LSTC (2007) LS-DYNA keyword user’s manual, version 971. Livermore Software Technology Corporation Livermore, United States of America

  • Mao H et al (2013) Development of a finite element human head model partially validated with thirty five experimental cases. J Biomech Eng 135:111002 10.1115/1.4025101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao H, Zhang L, Yang KH, King AI (2006) Application of a finite element model of the brain to study traumatic brain injury mechanisms in the rat. Stapp Car Crash J 50:583–600

    Google Scholar 

  • Marjoux D, Baumgartner D, Deck C, Willinger R (2008) Head injury prediction capability of the HIC, HIP, SIMon and ULP criteria. Accid Anal Prev 40:1135–1148 10.1016/j.aap.2007.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazumder MMG et al (2013) Mechanical properties of the brain-skull interface. Acta Bioeng Biomech 15:9 10.5277/abb130201

    Google Scholar 

  • McElhaney JH, Melvin JW, Roberts VL, Portnoy HD (1973) Dynamic characteristics of the tissues of the head. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mihai LA, Chin LK, Janmey PA, Goriely A (2015) A comparison of hyperelastic constitutive models applicable to brain and fat tissues. J R Soc Interface 12:20150486 10.1098/rsif.2015.0486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller K (2011) Biomechanics of the brain. Springer, New York 10.1007/978-1-4419-9997-9

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miller K, Chinzei K (1997) Constitutive modelling of brain tissue: experiment and theory. J Biomech 30:1115–1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(97)00092-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller K, Chinzei K (2002) Mechanical properties of brain tissue in tension. J Biomech 35:483–490 10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00234-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller RT, Margulies SS, Leoni M, Nonaka M, Chen X, Smith DH, Meaney DF (1998) Finite element modeling approaches for predicting injury in an experimental model of severe diffuse axonal injury. SAE Technical Paper: 983154. https://doi.org/10.4271/983154

  • Miller K, Chinzei K, Orssengo G, Bednarz P (2000) Mechanical properties of brain tissue in-vivo: experiment and computer simulation. J Biomech 33:1369–1376 10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00120-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller K, Wittek A, Joldes G, Horton A, Dutta-Roy T, Berger J, Morriss L (2010) Modelling brain deformations for computer-integrated neurosurgery. Int J Numer Methods Biomed 26:117–138 10.1002/cnm.1260

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Miller K, Wittek A, Joldes G (2011) Biomechanical modeling of the brain for computer-assisted neurosurgery. Biomechanics of the brain. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • NHTSA (2010) Federal motor vehicle safety standards: occupant crash protection. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, USA

  • Ogden RW (1997) Non-linear elastic deformations. Dover Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Peeters W, Brande RVD, Polinder S, Brazinova A, Steyerberg EW, Lingsma HF, Maas AIR (2015) Epidemiology of traumatic brain injury in Europe. Acta Neurochir 157:1683–1696 10.1007/s00701-015-2512-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rashid B, Destrade M, Gilchrist MD (2013) Mechanical characterization of brain tissue in simple shear at dynamic strain rates. J Mech Behav Biomed 28:71–85 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.07.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shigeta K, Kitagawa Y, Yasuki T (2009) Development of next generation human FE model capable of organ injury prediction. In: International technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles (ESV). Germany. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Stuttgart, pp 09–0111

  • Takhounts EG, Eppinger RH, Campbell JQ, Tannous RE, Power ED, Shook LS (2003) On the development of the SIMon finite element head model. Stapp Car Crash J 47:107–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Takhounts EG et al (2008) Investigation of traumatic brain injuries using the next generation of simulated injury monitor (SIMon) finite element head model. Stapp Car Crash J 52:1–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Takhounts EG, Craig MJ, Moorhouse K, McFadden J, Hasija V (2013) Development of brain injury criteria (Br IC). Stapp Car Crash J 57:243–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang F, Geng Z, Agrawal S, Han Y, Miller K, Wittek A (2017) Computation of brain deformations due to violent impact: quantitative analysis of the importance of the choice of boundary conditions and brain tissue constitutive model. In: Wittek A, Joldes G, Nielsen PMF, Doyle BJ, Miller K (eds) Computational biomechanics for medicine. Springer, New York, pp 159–173

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe R, Miyazaki H, Kitagawa Y, Yasuki T (2011) Research of collision speed dependency of pedestrian head and chest injuries using human FE model (THUMS version 4). In: Proceedings of 22nd enhanced safety of vehicles (ESV) conference, Washington DC, USA. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, pp 11-0043

  • Wittek A, Omori K (2003) Parametric study of effects of brain-skull boundary conditions and brain material properties on responses of simplified finite element brain model under angular acceleration in sagittal plane. JSME Int J 46:1388–1398 10.1299/jsmec.46.1388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittek A, Miller K, Kikinis R, Warfield SK (2007) Patient-specific model of brain deformation: application to medical image registration. J Biomech 40:919–929 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.02.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittek A, Dutta-Roy T, Taylor Z, Horton A, Washio T, Chinzei K, Miller K (2008) Subject-specific non-linear biomechanical model of needle insertion into brain. Comput Methods Biomed 11:135–146 10.1080/10255840701688095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittek A, Joldes G, Couton M, Warfield SK, Miller K (2010) Patient-specific non-linear finite element modelling for predicting soft organ deformation in real-time: application to non-rigid neuroimage registration. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 103:292–303 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2010.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittek A, Grosland NM, Joldes GR, Magnotta V, Miller K (2016) From finite element meshes to clouds of points: a review of methods for generation of computational biomechanics models for patient-specific applications. Ann Biomed Eng 44:3–15 10.1007/s10439-015-1469-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J (2011) Investigation of brain trauma biomechanics in vehicle traffic accidents using human body computational models. In: Wittek A, Nielsen PMF, Miller K (eds) Computational biomechanics for medicine. Springer, New York, pp 5–14 10.1007/978-1-4419-9619-0\_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yang KH, King AI (2011) Modeling of the brain for injury simulation and prevention. In: Miller K (ed) Biomechanics of the brain. Springer, New York, pp 90–110 10.1007/978-1-4419-9997-9\_5

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Xu W, Otte D (2008) Brain injury biomechanics in real world vehicle accident using mathematical models. Chin J Mech Eng EN 32:81–86 10.3901/CJME.2008.04.081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L et al (2001) Recent advances in brain injury research: a new human head model development and validation. Stapp Car Crash J 45:369–394

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the support of National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51605407, 51505403), Fujian Provincial Department of Science and Technology (Grant No. 2017J01652) and State Administration of Foreign Experts Affairs P. R. China (Grant No. GDT20173600566). All simulations using Total HUman Model for Safety (THUMS) Version 4.0 human body model in this research were conducted at Xiamen University of Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fang Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Adam Wittek was employed by Toyota Central Research and Development Laboratories in 2002–2004, where he was involved in development of the brain model for Total HUman Model for Safety (THUMS). He is a co-author of patent (in Japan) 2004-303220 “Method for determining brain damage, and human head finite element model” by Toyota Central and Development Laboratories.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, F., Han, Y., Wang, B. et al. Prediction of brain deformations and risk of traumatic brain injury due to closed-head impact: quantitative analysis of the effects of boundary conditions and brain tissue constitutive model. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 17, 1165–1185 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-018-1021-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-018-1021-z

Keywords

Navigation