Abstract
Thin samples adherent to a rigid substrate are considerably less compliant to indentation when compared to specimens that are not geometrically confined. Analytical corrections to this so-called substrate effect exist for various types of indenters but are not applicable when large deformations are possible, as is the case in biological materials. To overcome this limitation, we construct a nonlinear scaling model characterized by one single exponent, which we explore employing a parametric finite element analysis. The model is based on asymptotes of two length scales in relation to the sample thickness, i.e., indentation depth and radius of the contact area. For small indentation depth, we require agreement with analytical, linear models, whereas for large indentation depth and extensive contact area, we recognize similarity to uniaxial deformation, indicating a divergent force required to indent nonlinear materials. In contrast, we find linear materials not to be influenced by the substrate effect beyond first order, implying that nonlinear effects originating from either the material or geometric confinement are clearly separated only in thin samples. Furthermore, in this regime the scaling model can be derived by following a heuristic argument extending a linear model to large indentation depths. Lastly, in a large indentation setting where the contact is small in comparison with sample thickness, we observe nonlinear effects independent of material type that we attribute to a higher-order influence of geometrical confinement. In this regime, we define a scalar as the ratio of strains along principal axes as obtained by comparison with the case of a point force on a half-space. We find this scalar to be in quantitative agreement with the scaling exponent, indicating an approach to distinguish between nonlinear effects in the scaling model. While we conjecture our findings to be applicable to other flat-ended indenters, we focus on the case of a flat-ended cylinder in normal contact with a thin layer. The analytical solution for small indentation associated with this problem has been given by Hayes et al. (J Biomech 5:541–551, 1972), for which we provide a convenient numerical implementation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We note, that for \(\nu \rightarrow 0.5\), \(\lambda _1\lambda _2\lambda _3\approx 1\) in conjunction with the second invariant \(I_2\) implies a dependence on \(\lambda _i^{-4}\).
Other hyperelastic material models can be analytically evaluated in a similar fashion as addressed in Supplement E.
References
Argatov I, Mishuris G (2015) Contact mechanics of articular cartilage layers. Adv Struct Mater. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20083-5
Argatov I, Mishuris G (2016) Articular contact mechanics from an asymptotic modeling perspective: a review. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2016.00083
Block J, Witt H, Candelli A, Peterman EJG, Wuite GJL, Janshoff A, Köster S (2017) Nonlinear loading-rate-dependent force response of individual vimentin intermediate filaments to applied strain. Phys Rev Lett. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.118.048101
Boussinesq J (1885) Application des potentiels a l’etude de l’equilibre et du mouvement des solides elastiques. Gauthier-Villars, Paris
Bower AF (2015) Applied mechanics of solids. CRC Press, Boca Raton. http://solidmechanics.org/
Boyce MC, Arruda EM (2000) Constitutive models of rubber elasticity: a review. Rubber Chem Technol 73(3):504–523. https://doi.org/10.5254/1.3547602
Cao Y, Ma D, Raabe D (2009) The use of flat punch indentation to determine the viscoelastic properties in the time and frequency domains of a soft layer bonded to a rigid substrate. Acta Biomater 5:240–248
Cao G, Sui J, Sun S (2013) Evaluating the nucleus effect on the dynamic indentation behavior of cells. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 12:55–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-012-0381-z
Chen WT (1971) Computation of stresses and displacements in a layered elastic medium. Int J Eng Sci 9(9):775–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7225(71)90072-3
Ciavarella M, Hills DA, Monno G (1997) The inluence of rounded edges on indentation by a flat punch. Proc Inst Mech Eng 212:319–327
del Álamo JC, Meili R, Álvarez-González B, Alonso-Latorre B, Bastounis E, Firtel R, Lasheras JC (2013) Three-dimensional quantification of cellular traction forces and mechanosensing of thin substrata by Fourier traction force microscopy. PLoS ONE 8(9):e69,850. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069850
Dimitriadis EK, Horkay F, Maresca J, Kachar B, Chadwick RS (2002) Determination of elastic moduli of thin layers of soft material using the atomic force microscope. Biophys J 82(5):2798–2810. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3495(02)75620-8
Domke J, Radmacher M (1998) Measuring the elastic properties of thin polymer films with the atomic force microscope. Langmuir 14(12):3320–3325. https://doi.org/10.1021/la9713006
Finan JD, Fox PM, Morrison B III (2013) Non-ideal effects in indentation testing of soft tissues. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 13:573–584
Fischer-Cripps A (2000) A review of analysis methods for sub-micron indentation testing. Vacuum 58(4):569–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0042-207x(00)00377-8
Galin LA, Moss H, Sneddon IN (1961) Contact problems in the theory of elasticity. North Carolina State College, Raleigh
Gavara N, Chadwick RS (2012) Determination of the elastic moduli of thin samples and adherent cells using conical atomic force microscope tips. Nat Nanotechnol 7(11):733–736. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2012.163
Guck J, Ananthakrishnan R, Mahmood H, Moon TJ, Cunningham CC, Käs J (2001) The optical stretcher: a novel laser tool to micromanipulate cells. Biophys J 81(2):767–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3495(01)75740-2
Hayes WC, Keer L, Herrmann G, Mockros LF (1972) A mathematical analysis for indentation test of articular cartilage. J Biomech 5:541–551
Holzapfel GA (2000) Nonlinear solid mechanics—a continuum approach for engineering. Wiley, Chichester
Jaffar MJ (1997) A general solution to the axisymmetric frictional contact problem of a thin bonded elastic layer. Proc Inst Mech Eng C 211:549
Johnson KL (2003) Contact mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
King RB (1987) Elastic analysis of some punch problems for a layered medium. Int J Solids Struct 23:1657–1664
Köster S, Weitz DA, Goldman RD, Aebi U, Herrmann H (2015) Intermediate filament mechanics in vitro and in the cell: from coiled coils to filaments, fibers and networks. Curr Opin Cell Biol 32:82–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2015.01.001
Lange JR, Metzner C, Richter S, Schneider W, Spermann M, Kolb T, Whyte G, Fabry B (2017) Unbiased high-precision cell mechanical measurements with microconstrictions. Biophys J 112(7):1472–1480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2017.02.018
Lekka M, Laidler P, Gil D, Lekki J, Stachura Z, Hrynkiewicz AZ (1999) Elasticity of normal and cancerous human bladder cells studied by scanning force microscopy. Eur Biophys J 28(4):312–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002490050213
Li Q, Popov VL (2016) Indentation of flat-ended and tapered indenters with polygonal cross-sections. Facta Univ Ser Mech Eng 14:241–249
Lin DC, Shreiber DI, Dimitriadis EK, Horkay F (2009) Spherical indentation of soft matter beyond the hertzian regime: numerical and experimental validation of hyperelastic models. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 8:345–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-008-0139-9
Maas S, Ellis BJ, Ateshian GA, Weiss JA (2012) Febio: finite elements for biomechanics. J Biomech Eng 134:011005
Maas S, Rawlins D, Ateshian G, Weiss J (2014a) Preview User’s Manual Version 1.16. http://febio.org/download/preview-1-16-users-manual/
Maas S, Rawlins D, Weiss J, Ateshian G (2014b) FEBio Theory Manual Version 2.0. http://mrldata.sci.utah.edu/data/FEBio_tm_2.0.pdf
Mahaffy RE, Shih CK, MacKintosh FC, Käs J (2000) Scanning probe-based frequency-dependent microrheology of polymer gels and biological cells. Phys Rev Lett 85(4):880–883. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.85.880
Mahaffy RE, Park S, Gerde E, Käs J, Shih CK (2004) Quantitative analysis of the viscoelastic properties of thin regions of fibroblasts using atomic force microscopy. Biophys J 86(3):1777–1793. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3495(04)74245-9
Malgat R, Faure F, Boudaoud A (2016) A mechanical model to interpret cell-scale indentation experiments on plant tissues in terms of cell wall elasticity and turgor pressure. Front Plant Sci 7:1351
McKee CT, Last JA, Russell P, Murphy CJ (2011) Indentation versus tensile measurements of young’s modulus for soft biological tissues. Tissue Eng Part B 17(3):155–164
Merkel R, Kirchgeßner N, Cesa CM, Hoffmann B (2007) Cell force microscopy on elastic layers of finite thickness. Biophys J 93(9):3314–3323. https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.107.111328
Milani P, Braybrook SA, Boudaoud A (2013) Shrinking the hammer: micromechanical approaches to morphogenesis. J Exp Bot 64:4651–4662
Mooney M (1940) A theory of large elastic deformation. J Appl Phys 11(9):582. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1712836
O’Hagan JJ, Samani A (2008) Measurement of the hyperelastic properties of tissue slices with tumour inclusion. Phys Med Biol 53(24):7087–7106. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/53/24/006
Penn RW (1970) Volume changes accompanying the extension of rubber. J Rheol 14(4):509. https://doi.org/10.1122/1.549176
Petersen NO, McConnaughey WB, Elson EL (1982) Dependence of locally measured cellular deformability on position on the cell, temperature, and cytochalasin b. PNAS 79(17):5327–5331
Radmacher M (1997) Measuring the elastic properties of biological samples with the afm. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 16(2):47–57. https://doi.org/10.1109/51.582176
Radmacher M (2002) Measuring the elastic properties of living cells by the atomic force microscope. Methods Cell Biol 68:67–90
Rianna C, Radmacher M (2016) Cell mechanics as a marker for diseases: biomedical applications of afm. AIP Conf Proc. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4960276
Rivlin RS (1948) Large elastic deformations of isotropic materials. iv. further developments of the general theory. Phil Trans R Soc A 241(835):379–397. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1948.0024
Samani A, Bishop J, Luginbuhl C, Plewes DB (2003) Measuring the elastic modulus of ex vivo small tissue samples. Phys Med Biol 48(14):2183–2198. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/48/14/310
Schoeberl J (1997) Netgen: an advancing front 2D/3D-mesh generator based on abstract rules. Comput Vis Sci 1:41–52
Schwarz US, Safran SA (2013) Physics of adherent cells. Rev Mod Phys 85(3):1327–1381. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.85.1327
Schwarz US, Soiné JRD (2015) Traction force microscopy on soft elastic substrates: a guide to recent computational advances. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA) Mol Cell Res 1853(11):3095–3104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2015.05.028
Sneddon IN (1946) Boussinesq’s problem for a flat-ended cylinder. Math Proc Camb 42(01):29. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305004100022702
Sneddon IN (1948) Boussinesq’s problem for a rigid cone. Math Proc Camb 44(04):492. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305004100024518
Sneddon IN (1965) The relation between load and penetration in the axisymmetric boussinesq problem for a punch of arbitrary profile. Int J Eng Sci 3:47–57
Tabor D (1948) A simple theory of static and dynamic hardness. Proc Roy Soc Lond A Math 192(1029):247–274
Tabor D (1951) The hardness of metals. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Tu YO, Gazis DC (1964) The contact problem of a plate pressed between two spheres. J Appl Mech 31(4):659. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3629728
Vogler H, Felekis D, Nelson BJ, Grossniklaus U (2015) Measuring the mechanical properties of plant cell walls. Plants 4:167–182
Yang FQ (2006) Asymptotic solution to axisymmetric indentation of a compressible elastic thin film. Thin Solid Films 514:2274
Zhang M, Zheng YP, Mak AFT (1997) Estimating the effective young’s modulus of soft tissues from indentation—nonlinear finite element analysis of effects of friction and large deformation. Med Eng Phys 19(6):512–517
Zhao R, Simmons CA (2013) A simple method to estimate the exponential material parameters of heart valve tissue based on analogy between uniaxial tension and micropipette aspiration. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 12:1283–1290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-013-0470-7
Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL, Fox D (2014) The finite element method for solid and structural mechanics. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Holger Stark for bringing the issue of substrate effects to their attention.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fessel, A., Döbereiner, HG. Nonlinear compliance of elastic layers to indentation. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 17, 419–438 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-017-0969-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-017-0969-4