Skip to main content
Log in

A mathematical model for bone tissue regeneration inside a specific type of scaffold

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bone tissue regeneration using scaffolds is receiving an increasing interest in orthopedic surgery and tissue engineering applications. In this study, we present the geometrical characterization of a specific family of scaffolds based on a face cubic centered (FCC) arrangement of empty pores leading to analytical formulae of porosity and specific surface. The effective behavior of those scaffolds, in terms of mechanical properties and permeability, is evaluated through the asymptotic homogenization theory applied to a representative volume element identified with the unit cell FCC. Bone growth into the scaffold is estimated by means of a phenomenological model that considers a macroscopic effective stress as the mechanical stimulus that regulates bone formation. Cell migration within the scaffold is modeled as a diffusion process based on Fick’s law which allows us to estimate the cell invasion into the scaffold microstructure. The proposed model considers that bone growth velocity is proportional to the concentration of cells and regulated by the mechanical stimulus. This model allows us to explore what happens within the scaffold, the surrounding bone and their interaction. The mathematical model has been numerically implemented and qualitatively compared with previous experimental results found in the literature for a scaffold implanted in the femoral condyle of a rabbit. Specifically, the model predicts around 19 and 23% of bone regeneration for non-grafted and grafted scaffolds, respectively, both with an initial porosity of 76%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adachi T, Tomita Y, Sakaue H, Tanaka M (1997) Simulation of trabecular surface remodeling based on local stress nonuniformity. JSME Int Ser C 40:782–792

    Google Scholar 

  • Adachi T, Tsubota KI, Tomita Y, Hollister SJ (2001) Trabecular surface remodeling simulation for cancellous bone using microstructural voxel finite element models. J Biomech Eng-T Asme 123:403–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adachi T, Osako Y, Tanaka M, Hojo M, Hollister SJ (2006) Framework for optimal design of porous scaffold microstructure by computational simulation of bone regeneration. Biomaterials 27:3964–3972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babuska I (1976a) Mathematical and computational problems, numerical solution of partial differential equations. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Babuska I (1976b) Homogenization approach in engineering. Lecture Notes Econ Math Systems 134:137–153

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bailon-Plaza A, van der Meulen CH (2001) A mathematical framework to study the effects of growth factor influences on fracture healing. J Theor Biol 212:191–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaupré GS, Orr TE, Carter DR (1990) An approach for time-dependent bone modeling and remodeling-theoretical development. J Orthop Res 8:651–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benssousan A, Lions JL, Papanicoulau G (1978) Asymptotic analysis for periodic structures. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne DP, Prendergast PJ, Kelly DJ (2006) Optimisation of scaffold porosity using a stochastic model for cell proliferation and migration in mechanobiological simulations. J Biomech 39:S413– S414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biskobing DM (2002) COPD and osteoporosis. Chest 121:609–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brígido-Diego R, Pérez-Olmedilla M, Serrano-Aroca A, Gómez-Ribelles JL, Monleón-Pradas M, Gallego-Ferrer G, Salmerón-Sánchez M (2005) Acrylic scaffolds with interconnected spherical pores and controlled hydrophility for tissue engineering. J Mater Sci Mat Med 16:693–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brígido-Diego R, Más-Estellés J, Sanz JA, García-Aznar JM, Salmerón-Sánchez M (2007) Polymer scaffolds with interconnected spherical pores and controlled architecture for tissue engineering. Fabrication, mechanical properties and finite element modeling. J Biomed Mater Res B 81B:448–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowin SC, Moss-Salentijn L, Moss ML (1991) Candidates for the mechanosensory system in bone. J Biomech Eng-T Asme 113:191–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einhorn TA, Majeska RJ, Rush EB, Levine PM, Horrowitz MC (1995) The expression of cytokine activity by fracture callus. J Bone Miner Res 10:1272–1281

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson LJ (2005) Biomechanics of cellular solids. J Biomech 38:377–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Benito MJ, Garcia-Aznar JM, Kuiper JH, Doblare M (2005) Influence of fracture gap size on the pattern of long bone formation healing: a computational study. J Theor Biol 235:105–119

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gushue DL, Houck J, Lerner AM (2005) Rabbit knee joint biomechanics: motion analysis and modeling of forces during hopping. J Orthop Res 23:735–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbit, Karlsson, Sorensen (2001) Abaqus user’s manual v.6.2. HKS Inc. Pawtucket, RI

  • Hu Y, Winn SR, Krajbich I, Hollinger JO (2003) Porous polymer scaffolds surface-modified with arginine-glycine-aspartic acid enhance bone cell attachment and differentiation in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res A 64:583–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huiskes R, Weinans H, Grootenboer HJ, Dalstra M, Fudala B, Slooff TJ (1987) Adaptative bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis. J Biomech 20:1135–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutmacher DW (2000) Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials 21:2529–2543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishaug-Riley SL, Crane-Kruger GM, Yaszemski MJ, Mikos AG (1998) Three-dimensional culture of rat calvarial osteoblasts in porous biodegradable polymers. Biomaterials 19:1405–1412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs CR (1994) Numerical simulation of bone adaptation to mechanical loading. PhD Thesis, Stanford University, California

  • Jerome R, Maquet V (1997) Design of macroporous biodegradable polymer scaffolds for cell transplantation. Mat Sci Forum 250:15–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D (2005) Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials 26:5474–5491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohles SS, Roberts JB (2002) Linear poroelastic cancellous bone anisotropy: trabecular solid elastic and fluid transport properties. J Biomech Eng-T Asme 124:521–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacroix D, Prendergast PJ (2002) A mechano-regulation model for tissue differentiation during fracture healing: analysis of gap size and loading. J Biomech 35:1163–1171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin RB (1984) Porosity and specific surface of bone. Critical Rev Biomed Eng 179–222

  • Metsger DS, Rieger MR, Foreman DW (1999) Mechanical properties of sintered hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate ceramic. J Mat Sci Mat Med 10:9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick CW Jr, Mikos AG, McIntire (1998) Prospectus of tissue engineering. In: Patrick CW Jr, Mikos AG, McIntire LV (eds). Frontiers in tissue engineering. Elsevier, New York, pp 3–14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Porté-Durrieu MC, Guillemot F, Pallu S, Labrugere C, Brouillaud B, Bareille R, Amédée J, Barthe N, Dard M, Baquey C (2004) Cyclo-(DfKRG) peptide grafting onto Ti-6Al-4V: physical characterization and interest towards human osteoprogenitor cells adhesion. Biomaterials 25:4837–4846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pothuaud L, Fricain JC, Pallu S, Bareille R, Renard M, Durrieu MC, Dard M, Vernizeau M, Amédée J (2005) Mathematical modeling of the distribution of newly formed bone in bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 26:6788–6797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose FR, Oreffo RO (2002) Bone tissue engineering: hope vs hype. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 292:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Palencia E (1980) Non homogeneous media and vibration theory. Lecture Notes Phys 127

  • Tadic D, Beckmann F, Schwarz K, Epple M (2004) A novel method to produce hydroxyapatite objects with interconnecting porosity that avoids sintering. Biomaterials 25:3335–3340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang L, Lin Z, Yong-Ming L (2006) Effects of different magnitudes of mechanical strain on osteoblasts in vitro. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 344:122–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terada K, Ito T, Kikuchi N (1998) Characterization of the mechanical behaviors of solid–fluid mixture by the homogenization method. Comput Method Appl M 153:223–257

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Turner CH, Forwood MR, Rho J, Yoshikawa T (1994) Mechanical loading thresholds for lamellar and woven bone formation. J Bone Miner Res 9:87–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaccaro AR (2002) The role of the osteoinductive scaffold in synthetic bone graft. Orthopedics 25:571–578

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Doblare.

Additional information

This project was funded by IBERCAJA. Its finantial support is gratefully acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sanz-Herrera, J.A., Garcia-Aznar, J.M. & Doblare, M. A mathematical model for bone tissue regeneration inside a specific type of scaffold. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 7, 355–366 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-007-0089-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-007-0089-7

Keywords

Navigation