Skip to main content
Log in

Geometric Generalisations of shake and rattle

  • Published:
Foundations of Computational Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A geometric analysis of the shake and rattle methods for constrained Hamiltonian problems is carried out. The study reveals the underlying differential geometric foundation of the two methods, and the exact relation between them. In addition, the geometric insight naturally generalises shake and rattle to allow for a strictly larger class of constrained Hamiltonian systems than in the classical setting.

In order for shake and rattle to be well defined, two basic assumptions are needed. First, a nondegeneracy assumption, which is a condition on the Hamiltonian, i.e., on the dynamics of the system. Second, a coisotropy assumption, which is a condition on the geometry of the constrained phase space. Non-trivial examples of systems fulfilling, and failing to fulfill, these assumptions are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H.C. Andersen, Rattle: a “velocity” version of the shake algorithm for molecular dynamics calculations, J. Comput. Phys. 52, 24–34 (1983).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. P. Dirac, Lectures on Quantum Mechanics (Dover Publications, New York, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Z. Ge, J.E. Marsden, Lie-Poisson Hamilton-Jacobi theory and Lie-Poisson integrators, Phys. Lett. A 133, 134–139 (1988).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. M.J. Gotay, On coisotropic imbeddings of presymplectic manifolds, Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 84, 111–114 (1982).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Gotay, J. Nester, G. Hinds, Presymplectic manifolds and the Dirac–Bergmann theory of constraints, J. Math. Phys. 19, 2388 (1978).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. V. Guillemin, S. Sternberg, Symplectic Techniques in Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. E. Hairer, S. Nørsett, G. Wanner, Solving Ordinary Differential Equations: Nonstiff Problems (Springer, Berlin, 1993).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. E. Hairer, C. Lubich, G. Wanner, Geometric Numerical Integration: Structure-Preserving Algorithms for Ordinary Differential Equations (Springer, Berlin, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  9. L. Jay, Symplectic partitioned Runge-Kutta methods for constrained Hamiltonian systems, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 33, 368–387 (1996).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. B. Leimkuhler, S. Reich, Simulating Hamiltonian Dynamics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. B. Leimkuhler, R. Skeel, Symplectic numerical integrators in constrained Hamiltonian systems, J. Comput. Phys. 112, 117–125 (1994).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. P. Libermann, C. Marle, Symplectic Geometry and Analytical Mechanics (D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, 1987).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Marsden, T. Ratiu, Introduction to Mechanics and Symmetry: A Basic Exposition of Classical Mechanical Systems (Springer, New York, 1999).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. R. McLachlan, K. Modin, O. Verdier, M. Wilkins, Symplectic integrators for index one constraints (2012). arXiv:1207.4250.

  15. S. Reich, Symplectic integration of constrained Hamiltonian systems by composition methods, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 33, 475–491 (1996).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. J.-P. Ryckaert, G. Ciccotti, H.J. Berendsen, Numerical integration of the Cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes, J. Comput. Phys. 23, 327–341 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

O. Verdier would like to acknowledge the support of the GeNuIn Project, funded by the Research Council of Norway, the Marie Curie International Research Staff Exchange Scheme Fellowship within the European Commission’s Seventh Framework Programme as well as the hospitality of the Institute for Fundamental Sciences of Massey University, New Zealand, where some of this research was conducted. K. Modin would like to thank the Marsden Fund in New Zealand, the Department of Mathematics at NTNU in Trondheim, the Royal Swedish Academy of Science and the Swedish Research Council, contract VR-2012-335, for support. We would like to thank the reviewers for helpful suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert I McLachlan.

Additional information

Communicated by Arieh Iserles.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

I McLachlan, R., Modin, K., Verdier, O. et al. Geometric Generalisations of shake and rattle . Found Comput Math 14, 339–370 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10208-013-9163-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10208-013-9163-y

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

Navigation