Abstract
Auditory enhancement is the phenomenon whereby the salience or detectability of a target sound within a masker is enhanced by the prior presentation of the masker alone. Enhancement has been demonstrated using both simultaneous and forward masking in normal-hearing listeners and may play an important role in auditory and speech perception within complex and time-varying acoustic environments. The few studies of enhancement in hearing-impaired listeners have reported reduced or absent enhancement effects under forward masking, suggesting a potentially peripheral locus of the effect. Here, auditory enhancement was measured in eight cochlear-implant (CI) users with direct stimulation. Masked thresholds were measured under simultaneous and forward masking as a function of the number of masking electrodes, and the electrode spacing between the maskers and the target. Evidence for auditory enhancement was obtained under simultaneous masking, qualitatively consistent with results from normal-hearing listeners. However, no significant enhancement was observed under forward masking, in contrast to earlier results with normal-hearing listeners. The results suggest that the normal effects of auditory enhancement are partially but not fully experienced by CI users. To the extent that the CI users’ results differ from normal, it may be possible to apply signal processing to restore the missing aspects of enhancement.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson ES, Oxenham AJ, Nelson PB, Nelson DA (2012) Assessing the role of spectral and intensity cues in spectral ripple detection and discrimination in cochlear-implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 132:3925–3934
Antunes FM, Nelken I, Covey E, Malmierca MS (2010) Stimulus-specific adaptation in the auditory thalamus of the anesthetized rat. PLoS One 5:e14071
Beim JA, Elliott M, Oxenham AJ, Wojtczak M (2015) Stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions provide no evidence for the role of efferents in the enhancement effect. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 16:613–629
Berlin CI, Hood LJ, Cecola RP, Jackson DF, Szabo P (1993) Does type I afferent neuron dysfunction reveal itself through lack of efferent suppression? Hear Res 65:40–50
Byrne AJ, Stellmack MA, Viemeister NF (2011) The enhancement effect: evidence for adaptation of inhibition using a binaural centering task. J Acoust Soc Am 129:2088–2094
Byrne AJ, Stellmack MA, Viemeister NF (2013) The salience of enhanced components within inharmonic complexes. J Acoust Soc Am 134:2631–2634
Carcagno S, Semal C, Demany L (2012) Auditory enhancement of increments in spectral amplitude stems from more than one source. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 13:693–702
Carcagno S, Semal C, Demany L (2013a) Enhancement of increments in spectral amplitude: further evidence for a mechanism based on central adaptation. Adv Exp Med Biol 787:175–182
Carcagno S, Semal C, Demany L (2013b) No need for templates in the auditory enhancement effect. PLoS One 8:e67874
Carcagno S, Plack CJ, Portron A, Semal C, Demany L (2014) The auditory enhancement effect is not reflected in the 80-Hz auditory steady-state response. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 15:621–630
Carlyon RP (1989) Changes in the masked thresholds of brief tones produced by prior bursts of noise. Hear Res 41:223–236
Feng L, Oxenham AJ (2015) New perspectives on the measurement and time course of auditory enhancement. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 41:1696–1708
Goupell MJ, Mostardi MJ (2012) Evidence of the enhancement effect in electrical stimulation via electrode matching (L). J Acoust Soc Am 131:1007–1010
Guinan JJ Jr (2006) Olivocochlear efferents: anatomy, physiology, function, and the measurement of efferent effects in humans. Ear Hear 27:589–607
Henry BA, Turner CW, Behrens A (2005) Spectral peak resolution and speech recognition in quiet: normal hearing, hearing impaired, and cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 118:1111–1121
Holt LL, Lotto AJ (2002) Behavioral examinations of the level of auditory processing of speech context effects. Hear Res 167:156–169
Kiang NY-S, Watanabe T, Thomas EC, Clark LF (1965) Discharge patterns of single fibres in the cat’s auditory nerve. MIT Press, Cambridge
Levitt H (1971) Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am 49:467–477
Moore BCJ, Glasberg BR, Oxenham AJ (2012) Effects of pulsing of a target tone on the ability to hear it out in different types of complex sounds. J Acoust Soc Am 131:2927–2937
Neff DL (1986) Confusion effects with sinusoidal and narrowband-noise forward maskers. J Acoust Soc Am 79:1519–1529
Nelson PC, Young ED (2010) Neural correlates of context-dependent perceptual enhancement in the inferior colliculus. J Neurosci 30:6577–6587
Palmer AR, Summerfield Q, Fantini DA (1995) Responses of auditory-nerve fibers to stimuli producing psychophysical enhancement. J Acoust Soc Am 97:1786–1799
Richards VM, Huang R, Kidd G Jr (2004) Masker-first advantage for cues in informational masking. J Acoust Soc Am 116:2278–2288
Schouten JF (1940) The residue, a new component in subjective sound analysis. Proc Kon Ned Akad Wetensch 43:356–365
Serman M, Semal C, Demany L (2008) Enhancement, adaptation, and the binaural system. J Acoust Soc Am 123:4412–4420
Smith RL (1979) Adaptation, saturation, and physiological masking in single auditory-nerve fibers. J Acoust Soc Am 65:166–178
Summerfield Q, Haggard MP, Foster J, Gray S (1984) Perceiving vowels from uniform spectra: phonetic exploration of an auditory after-effect. Percept Psychophys 35:203–213
Thibodeau LM (1991) Performance of hearing-impaired persons on auditory enhancement tasks. J Acoust Soc Am 89:2843–2850
Ulanovsky N, Las L, Farkas D, Nelken I (2004) Multiple time scales of adaptation in auditory cortex neurons. J Neurosci 24:10440–10453
Viemeister NF (1980) Adaptation of masking. In: van den Brink G, Bilsen FA (eds) Psychophysical, physiological and behavioural studies in hearing. Delft U.P, Delft, pp 190–198
Viemeister NF, Bacon SP (1982) Forward masking by enhanced components in harmonic complexes. J Acoust Soc Am 71:1502–1507
Viemeister NF, Byrne AJ, Stellmack MA (2013) Spectral and level effects in auditory signal enhancement. Adv Exp Med Biol 787:167–174
Wang N, Oxenham AJ (2016) Effects of auditory enhancement on the loudness of masker and target components. Hear Res 333:150–156
Wang N, Kreft H, Oxenham AJ (2012) Vowel enhancement effects in cochlear-implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 131:EL421–EL426
Wang N, Kreft HA, Oxenham AJ (2015) Loudness context effects in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear-implant users. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 16:535–545
Wang N, Kreft H, Oxenham AJ (2016) Induced loudness reduction and enhancement in acoustic and electric hearing. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 17:383–391
Wilson JP (1970) An auditory afterimage. In: Plomp R, Smoorenburg GF (eds) Frequency analysis and psychophysics of hearing. Sijthof, Leiden, pp 303–315
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by NIDCD Grant R01 DC 012262 and by the Lions 5M International Hearing Foundation. The authors wish to extend special thanks to the subjects who participated in this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kreft, H.A., Oxenham, A.J. Auditory Enhancement in Cochlear-Implant Users Under Simultaneous and Forward Masking. JARO 18, 483–493 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-017-0618-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-017-0618-8