Skip to main content
Log in

Sphincter-saving therapy for fistula-in-ano: long-term follow-up after FiLaC®

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The treatment of anal fistula remains a challenge between maintaining continence and radical surgery to prevent recurrence. Fistula-tract Laser Closure (FiLaC®) is a sphincter-saving technique using a radial emitting laser fibre to close the fistula tract. The aim of this study was to report long-term outcomes in patients who received FiLaC® therapy for transsphincteric and intersphincteric anal fistula between January 2011 and December 2017.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed on patients who were treated with FiLaC®- for a transsphincteric and intersphincteric anal fistula at our institution between January 2011 and December 2017. In all patients, the FiLaC® procedure was combined with a closure of the internal orifice using a simple 3-0 Z stitch. Patient characteristics, previous proctological history, healing rates, failures and postoperative continence were investigated.

Results

The study included 83 patients [mean age 50.01 ± 14.59 years. 64 (77.1%) males] with a mean follow-up period of 41.99 (± 21.59) months (range 4–87 months). Thirteen patients (15.7%) had a recurrent fistula. 65 patients (78.3%) had undergone prior abscess drainage with insertion of a seton. The primary healing rate was 74.7% (62 of 83 patients) overall. Eleven (13.3%) of the 21 patients (25.3%) who failed FiLaC®-therapy underwent a second operation. In eight cases, Re-FiLaC® and in three cases, fistulectomy with closure of the internal orifice was performed. Afterwards 6 (54.5%) of these 11 patients could be considered cured: 3 who had fistulectomy and three who had Re-FiLaC® treatment. The overall healing rate after second FiLaC® was 78.3% (65 of 83 patients) while the overall healing rate for FiLaC® therapy combined with any second procedure was 81.9% (68 of 83 patients). The follow-up period in this group of 11 patients who received re-operation was 38 months (range 13–84 months). Changes in continence occurred in eight patients (9.6%). No patient reported major incontinence postoperatively.

Conclusions

The FiLaC® procedure is associated with good healing rates in long-term follow-up and should be considered as a treatment option for transsphincteric and intersphincteric anal fistulae, especially due to the low complication rate and low risk of sphincter injury.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Owen HA, Buchanan GN, Schizas A et al (2016) Quality of life with anal fistula. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 98:334–338. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2016.0136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Zanotti C, Martinez-Puente C, Pascual I et al (2007) An assessment of the incidence of fistula-in-ano in four countries of the European Union. Int J Colorectal Dis 22:1459–1462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-007-0334-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Limura E, Giordano P (2015) Modern management of anal fistula. World J Gastroenterol 21:12–20. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i1.12

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Narang SK, Keogh K, Alam NN et al (2017) A systematic review of new treatments for cryptoglandular fistula in ano. Surgeon 15:30–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2016.02.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Malakorn S, Sammour T, Khomvilai S et al (2017) Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract for fistula in ano: lessons learned from a decade of experience. Dis Colon Rectum 60:1065–1070. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000880

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Meinero P, Mori L (2011) Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT): a novel sphincter-saving procedure for treating complex anal fistulas. Tech Coloproctol 15:417–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-011-0769-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Köckerling F, Alam NN, Narang SK et al (2015) Treatment of Fistula-In-Ano with Fistula Plug - a review under special consideration of the technique. Front Surg 2:55. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2015.00055

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Scoglio D, Walker AS, Fichera A (2014) Biomaterials in the treatment of anal fistula: hope or hype? Clin Colon Rectal Surg 27:172–181. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1394156

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Wilhelm A (2011) A new technique for sphincter-preserving anal fistula repair using a novel radial emitting laser probe. Tech Coloproctol 15:445–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-011-0726-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Giamundo P, Geraci M, Tibaldi L, Valente M (2014) Closure of fistula-in-ano with laser–FiLaCTM: an effective novel sphincter-saving procedure for complex disease. Colorectal Dis 16:110–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12440

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Terzi MC, Agalar C, Habip S et al (2018) Closing perianal fistulas using a laser: long-term results in 103 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 61:599–603. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000001038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Oztürk E, Gülcü B (2014) Laser ablation of fistula tract: a sphincter-preserving method for treating fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 57:360–364. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000067

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Giamundo P, Esercizio L, Geraci M et al (2015) Fistula-tract Laser Closure (FiLaCTM): long-term results and new operative strategies. Tech Coloproctol 19:449–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-015-1282-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wilhelm A, Fiebig A, Krawczak M (2017) Five years of experience with the FiLaCTM laser for fistula-in-ano management: long-term follow-up from a single institution. Tech Coloproctol 21:269–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-017-1599-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Lauretta A, Falco N, Stocco E et al (2018) Anal Fistula laser closure: the length of fistula is the Achilles’ heel. Tech Coloproctol 22:933–939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-018-1885-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Marref I, Spindler L, Aubert M et al (2019) The optimal indication for FiLaC® is high trans-sphincteric fistula-in-ano: a prospective cohort of 69 consecutive patients. Tech Coloproctol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-019-02077-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stijns J, van Loon YT, Clermonts SHEM et al (2019) Implementation of laser ablation of fistula tract (LAFT) for perianal fistulas: do the results warrant continued application of this technique? Tech Coloproctol 23:1127–1132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-019-02112-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zeileis A, Hothorn T (2002) Diagnostic checking in regression relationship. R News 2(3):7–10. https://CRAN.R-project.org/doc/Rnews/. Accessed 26 July 2020

  19. Wickham H (2020) A Grammar of data manipulation Version 0.8.4. License: http:/dplyr.tidyverse.org https://github.com/tidyverse/dplyr. Accessed 26 July 2020

  20. Bache MB, Wickham H (2014) Magrittr: a forward-pipe operator for R. License: https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/magrittr. Accessed 26 July 2020

  21. Revelle W (2016) Psych: procedures for personality and psychological research, R package version 1.6.4, License: GPL-2/GPL-3, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych. Accessed 26 July 2020

  22. Kassambra A (2014) ggpubr: “ggplot2” based publication ready plots. License: GPL-2. https://rpkgs.datanovia.com/ggpubr/. Accessed 26 July 2020

  23. Wickham H (2016) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer, New York. Accessed 26 July 2020

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Mei Z, Wang Q, Zhang Y et al (2019) Risk factors for recurrence after anal fistula surgery: a meta-analysis. Int J Surg 69:153–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.08.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Alam A, Lin F, Fathallah N et al (2020) FiLaC® and Crohn’s disease perianal fistulas: a pilot study of 20 consecutive patients. Tech Coloproctol 24:75–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-019-02134-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mitalas LE, van Wijk JJ, Gosselink MP et al (2010) Seton drainage prior to transanal advancement flap repair: useful or not? Int J Colorectal Dis 25:1499–1502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-010-0993-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that there is no funding source.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Wolicki.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Author Dr. med. Thomas Deska has received travel grants and speaker honoraria from Company Biolitec biomedical GmbH Germany.

Ethics approval

The study was accepted by the local ethics committee of the Ruhr University Bochum.

Informed consent

All patients undergoing the FiLaC-procedure provided informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wolicki, A., Jäger, P., Deska, T. et al. Sphincter-saving therapy for fistula-in-ano: long-term follow-up after FiLaC®. Tech Coloproctol 25, 177–184 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02332-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02332-4

Keywords

Navigation