Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of severe faecal incontinence: long-term clinical, manometric and quality of life results

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Faecal incontinence (FI) is a complex and multifactorial health problem. Treatment has to be individualised, analysing the aetiology and gravity in every case. Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) has been shown to effectively improve treatment of FI.

Methods

Fifty patients with severe FI treated with SNS between March 2002 and December 2010 were analysed. Preoperative assessment included physical examination, anorectal manometry and anal endosonography. Anal continence was evaluated using the Wexner continence grading system. Quality of life was evaluated using the Fecal Incontinence Quality of life Scale (FIQLS). Follow-up appointments were scheduled at 1, 6 and 12 months and annually thereafter. Wexner score, FIQLS and the ability to defer defecation were assessed at each visit.

Results

Fifty patients underwent a permanent implant. The overall mean follow-up period was 55.52 ± 31.84 months. After 6 months, SNS significantly improved FI and positively impacted quality of life, as evidence by significant improvements in all 4 scales of the FIQLS. Anorectal manometry showed a trend towards an increase in maximum resting pressure and maximum pressure. After the first assessment at 6 months, Wexner score and FIQLS remained stable. Ability to defer defecation was also maintained. During follow-up, 3 patients (6 %) experienced implant site pain and episodes of extremity pain and paresthesias that were refractory to medical management and required device explantation. The implant site infection rate was 2 %.

Conclusions

Analysis of our long-term results confirms the safety and effectiveness of SNS in the management of patients with FI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baxter NN, Rothenberger DA, Lowry AC (2003) Measuring fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1591–1605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bharucha AE, Locke GR 3rd, Seide BM, Zinsmeister AR (2004) A new questionnaire for constipation and faecal incontinence. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 20:355–364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Eypasch E, Williams JI, Wood-Dauphinee S et al (1995) Gastrointestinal quality of life index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg 82:216–222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rothbarth J, Bemelman WA, Wilhelmus JH et al (2001) What is the impact of fecal incontinence on quality of life? Dis Colon Rectum 44:67–71

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Thomas TM, Egan M, Walgrove A, Meade TW (1984) The prevalence of fecal and double incontinence. Community Med 6:216–220

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Denis P, Bercoff E, Bizien MF et al (1992) Prevalence of anal incontinence in adults. Gastroent Clin Biol 16:344–350

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nelson R, Norton N, Cautley E, Furner S (1995) Community-based prevalence of anal incontinence. JAMA 274:559

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Campbell AJ, Reinken J, McCosh L (1985) Incontinence in the elderly: prevalence and prognosis. Age Ageing 14:65–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kok AL, Voorhorst FJ, Burger CW, van Houten P, Kenemans P, Jansens J (1992) Urinary and faecal incontinence in community-residing elderly women. Age Ageing 21:211–215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Whitehead WE, Borrud L, Goode PS et al (2009) Fecal incontinence in US adults: epidemiology and risk factors. Gastroenterology 137:512

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Johanson JF, Lafferty J (1996) Epidemiology of fecal incontinence: the silent affliction. Am J Gastroenterol 91:33–36

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mavrantonis C, Wexner SD (1998) A clinical approach to fecal incontinence. J Clin Gastroenterol 27:108–121

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wexner SD, Coller JA, Devroede G et al (2010) Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: results of a 120-patient prospective multicenter study. Ann Surg 251:441–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jorge JMN, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW et al (2000) Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 43:9–16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Navarro JM, Arroyo Sebastián A, Pérez Vicente F et al (2007) Sacral root neuromodulation as treatment for fecal incontinence. Preliminary results. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 99:636–642

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Barisic GI, Krivokapic ZV, Markovic VA, Popovic MA (2006) Outcome of overlapping anal sphincter repair after 3 months and after a mean of 80 months. Int J Colorectal Dis 21:52–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Setti Carraro P, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ (1994) Long-term results of postanal repair for neurogenic faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 81:149–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jameson JS, Speakman CT, Darzi A, Chia YW, Henry MM (1994) Audit of postanal repair in the treatment of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 37:369–372

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Casal E, Ildefonso S, Carracedo R, Facal C, Sánchez JA (2004) Artificial bowel sphincter in severe anal incontinence. Colorectal Dis 6:180–184

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. O’Brien PE, Skinner S (2000) Restoring control: the Acticon Neosphincter artificial bowel sphincter in the treatment of anal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1213–1216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Matzel KE, Madoff RD, LaFontaine LJ, Dynamic Graciloplasty Therapy Study Group et al (2001) Complications of dynamic graciloplasty: incidence, management, and impact on outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 44:1427–1435

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chapman A, Geerdes B, Hewett P et al (2002) Systematic review of dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 89:138–153

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tanagho EA, Schmidt RA (1982) Bladder pacemaker: scientific basis and clinical future. J Urol 20:614–619

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Matzel KE, Stadelmaier U, Hohenfellner M, Gall FP (1995) Electrical stimulation for the treatment of fecal incontinence. Lancet 346:1124–1127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Matzel KE, Kamm MA, Stosser M et al (2004) Sacral spinal nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: multicentre study. Lancet 363:1270–1276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Leroi AM, Parc Y, Lehur PA et al (2005) Efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: results of a multicenter double-blind crossover study. Ann Surg 242:662–669

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Faucheron JL, Bost R, Duffournet V, Dupuy S, Cardin N, Bonaz B (2006) Sacral neuromodulation in the treatment of severe anal incontinence. Forty consecutive cases treated in one institution. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 30:669–672

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gourcerol G, Gallas S, Michot F, Denis P, Leroi AM (2007) Sacral nerve stimulation in fecal incontinence: are there factors associated with success? Dis Colon Rectum 50:3–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Uludag O, Koch SM, van Gemert WG, Dejong CH, Baeten CG (2004) Sacral neuromodulation in patients with fecal incontinence: a single-center study. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1350–1357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tjandra JJ, Chan MK, Yeh CH, Murray-Green C (2008) Sacral nerve stimulation is more effective than optimal medical therapy for severe fecal incontinence: a randomized, controlled study. Dis Colon Rectum 51:494–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Altomare DF, Ratto C, Ganio E, Lolli P, Masin A, Villani RD (2009) Long term outcome of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 52:11–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hetzer FH, Bieler A, Hahnloser D, Löhlein F, Clavien PA, Demartines N (2006) Outcome and cost analysis of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 93:1411–1417

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Melenhorst J, Koch SM, Uludag O, van Gemert WG, Baeten GG (2007) Sacral neuromodulation in patients with faecal incontinence: results of the first 100 permanent implantations. Colorectal Dis 9:725–730

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Conaghan P, Farouk R (2005) Sacral nerve stimulation can be successful in patients with ultrasound evidence of external anal sphincter disruption. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1610–1614

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kenefick NJ, Vaizey CJ, Cohen RC, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA (2002) Medium-term results of permanent sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 89:896–901

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Chan M, Tjandra J (2008) Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: external anal sphincter defect vs. intact anal sphincter. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1015–10125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Leroi AM, Michot F, Grise P, Denis P (2001) Effect of sacral nerve stimulation in patients with fecal and urinary incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 44:779–789

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Vaizey CJ, Kamm MA, Turner IC, Nicholss RJ, Woloszko J (1999) Effects of short term sacral nerve stimulation on anal and rectal function in patients with anal incontinence. Gut 44:407–412

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Altomare DF, Rinaldi M, Petrolino M et al (2004) Permanent sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence and associated urinary disturbances. Int J Colorectal Dis 19:203–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. George AT, Kalmar K, Panarese A, Dudding TC, Nicholls RJ, Vaizey CJ (2012) Long-term outcomes of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 55:302–306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Damon H, Barth X, Roman S, Mion F (2013) Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence improves symptoms, quality of life and patients’ satisfaction: results of a monocentric series of 119 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:227–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Maeda Y, Matel K, Buntzen S, Laurberg S (2011) Postoperative issues of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence and constipation: a systematic literature review and treatment guideline. Dis Colon Rectum 54:1443–1460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Christiansen J, Rasmussen OO, Lindorff-Larsen K (1999) Longterm results of artificial anal sphincter implantation for severe anal incontinence. Ann Surg 230:45–48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Moya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moya, P., Arroyo, A., Lacueva, J. et al. Sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of severe faecal incontinence: long-term clinical, manometric and quality of life results . Tech Coloproctol 18, 179–185 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-013-1022-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-013-1022-y

Keywords

Navigation