Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Review of phenol treatment in sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease

  • Review
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Investigating minimally invasive methods for treatment of pilonidal disease, we reviewed the techniques and the results of phenol treatment of pilonidal disease in the medical literature.

Methods

A Pubmed search for all English language written papers and abstracts published between January 1964 and September 2007.

Results

Mean time to return to work is 2.3 ± 3.8 days and mean healing time is 20 ± 14 days. Overall success rate is 87 ± 10% with a mean follow-up of 2.0 ± 1.1 years. The most common postoperative complications after phenolization are development of abscesses and cellulites. The incidence of morbidities was mean 8.9 ± 4.7%.

Conclusions

Success rate looks better particularly in the cases that have 1–3 sinus orifices and comparable with the surgical methods. Though healing time of the wound is long, the procedure apparently lessens the time off work. Although results of this review indicate that phenol treatment may be beneficial for pilonidal disease, the lack of randomized studies results in only weak evidence. There is also the need for longer-term follow-up data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McCallum I, King PM, Bruce J (2007) Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 17;CD006213

  2. Akinci OF, Bozer M, Uzunkoy A, Duzgun SA, Coskun A (1999) Incidence and aetiological factors in pilonidal sinus among Turkish soldiers. Eur J Surg 165:339–342

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pilonidal sinus: is surgery alone enough? (2003) Colorectal Dis 5:205 (Editorial)

  4. Abdul-Ghani AK, Abdul-Ghani AN, Ingham Clark CL (2006) Day-care surgery for pilonidal sinus. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 88:656–658

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Petersen S, Aumann G, Kramer A, Doll D, Sailer M, Hellmich G (2007) Short-term results of Karydakis flap for pilonidal sinus disease. Tech Coloproctol 11:235–240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Armstrong JH, Barcia PJ (1994) Pilonidal sinus disease. The conservative approach. Arch Surg 129:914–917

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Odili J, Gault D (2002) Laser depilation of the natal cleft—an aid to healing the pilonidal sinus. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 84:29–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schulze SM, Patel N, Hertzog D, Fares LG 2nd (2006) Treatment of pilonidal disease with laser epilation. Am Surg 72:534–537

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaymakcioglu N, Yagci G, Simsek A et al (2005) Treatment of pilonidal sinus by phenol application and factors affecting the recurrence. Tech Coloproctol 9:21–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dogru O, Camci C, Aygen E, Girgin M, Topuz O (2004) Pilonidal sinus treated with crystallized phenol: an eight-year experience. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1934–1938

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schneider IH, Thaler K, Köckerling F (1994) Treatment of pilonidal sinuses by phenol injections. Int J Colorectal Dis 9:200–202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Vara-Thorbeck R, Mekinassi K, Berchid S (1990) Phenol treatment of pilonidal sinuses. Zentralbl Chir 115:777–780

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Stansby G, Greatorex R (1989) Phenol treatment of pilonidal sinuses of the natal cleft. Br J Surg 76:729–730

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kelly SB, Graham WJ (1989) Treatment of pilonidal sinus by phenol injection. Ulster Med J 58:56–59

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hegge HG, Vos GA, Patka P, Hoitsma HF (1987) Treatment of complicated or infected pilonidal sinus disease by local application of phenol. Surgery 102:52–54

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Duchateau J, De Mol J, Bostoen H, Allegaert W (1985) Pilonidal sinus. Excision–marsupialization–phenolization? Acta Chir Belg 85:325–328

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Blumberg NA (1978) Pilonidal sinus treated by conservative surgery and the local application of phenol. S Afr J Surg 16:245–247

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shorey BA (1975) Pilonidal sinus treated by phenol injection. Br J Surg 62:407–408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rickles JA (1974) Ambulatory surgical management of pilonidal sinus. Am Surg 40:237–240

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Stephens FO, Sloane DR (1969) Conservative management of pilonidal sinus. Surg Gynecol Obstet 129:786–788

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Stewart TJ, Bell M (1969) The treatment of pilonidal sinus by phenol injection. Ulster Med J 38:167–171

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Stephens FO, Sloane DR (1968) Management of pilonidal sinus—a modern approach. Med J Aust 1:395–396

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Maurıce BA, Greenwood RK (1964) A conservative treatment of pilonidal sinus. Br J Surg 51:510–512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cuneyt Kayaalp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kayaalp, C., Aydin, C. Review of phenol treatment in sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease. Tech Coloproctol 13, 189–193 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-009-0519-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-009-0519-x

Keywords

Navigation