Abstract
Background
In patients with colorectal cancer, involvement of the lymph nodes is one of the most important prognostic factors. The aim of this study was to determine the independent prognostic value of the lymph node ratio (LNR), that is the relationship between the involved and examined lymph nodes, in patients with colorectal cancer.
Methods
Included in the study were 113 patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma. The patients were divided into three groups according to the proportion of involved lymph nodes: LNR-0, when there was no lymph node involvement; LNR-1, when there was involvement of up to 20% of the examined lymph nodes, and LNR-2, when there was involvement of 21% or more of the examined nodes. The relationship between lymph node ratio, the number of lymph nodes removed, and the number of lymph nodes involved by cancer was determined. The 5-year survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier test.
Results
There was a significant difference in 5-year overall between patients in the different LNR groups (p=0.009). Patients in the LNR-0 group had a 5-year overall survival greater than 80%, while those in the LNR-1 and LNR-2 groups had 5-year overall survival rates less than 60% and 40%, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the LNR is an independent prognostic variable in 5-year overall survival (p=0.009).
Conclusion
The results showed that the LNR can be considered an independent prognostic variable in overall survival of patients with colorectal cancer.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (2009) SEER Stat Fact Sheets. Cancer: Colon and Rectum. National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/colorect.html. Accessed 19 Apr 2009
Sanfelippo PM, Beahrs OH (1972) Factors in the prognosis of adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum. Arch Surg 104:401–406
Cain AS, Longino LA (1970) Carcinoma of the colon in children. J Pediatr Surg 5:527–532
Wolmark N, Wieand HS, Rockette HE et al (1983) The prognostic significance of tumor location and bowel obstruction in Dukes B and C colorectal cancer. Findings from the NSABP clinical trials. Ann Surg 198:743–752
Grinnel RS (1939) The grading and prognosis of carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Ann Surg 109:500–533
Dukes CE (1932) The classification of cancer of the rectum. J Pathol 35:323–332
Astler VB, Coller FA (1954) The prognostic significance of direct extension of carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Ann Surg 139:846–851
Dukes CE, Bussey HJR (1958) The spread of rectal cancer and its effect on prognosis. Br J Cancer 12:309–320
Halvorsen TB, Seim E (1988) Influence of mucinous components on survival in colorectal adenocarcinomas: a multivariate analysis. J Clin Pathol 41:1068–1072
Martinez CAR, Priolli DG, Cardinalli IA et al (2006) Correlação entre o padrão de distribuição tecidual e os valores séricos do antígeno carcinoembrionário em doentes com câncer. Rev Bras Coloproct 26:41–53
Cutait R (1991) Contribuição ao estudo do antígeno carcinoembrionário e dos antígenos de superfície ABH no câncer colo-retal. Tese (Livre Docência) — Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, pp 96
Khankhanian N, Mavligit GM, Russell WO et al (1977) Prognostic significance of vascular invasion in colorectal cancer of Dukes’ B class. Cancer 39:1195–1200
Cruz JV, Cutait R, Martinez CAR et al (2006) Importância prognostica da invasão neural no câncer colorretal. Estudo imunoistoquímico com a proteína S-10100. Rev Bras Coloproct 26:280–293
Wang Y, Jatkoe T, Zhang Y et al (2004) Gene expression profiles and molecular markers to predict recurrence of Dukes’ B colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:1564–1571
Sigurdson ER (2003) Lymph node dissection: is it diagnostic or therapeutic? J Clin Oncol 21:965–967
Gajra A, Newman N, Gamble GP et al (2003) Effect of number of lymph nodes sampled on outcome in patients with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 21:1029–1034
Wong JH, Severino R, Honnebier MB (1999) Number of nodes examined and staging accuracy in colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 17:2896–2900
Le Voyer TE, Sigurdson ER, Hanlon AL et al (2003) Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analysed: a secondary survey of intergroup trial INT-0089. J Clin Oncol 21:2912–2919
Celen O, Yildirim E, Berberoglu U (2007) Prognostic impact of positive lymph node ratio in gastric carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 96:95–101
Persiani R, Rausei S, Biondi A et al (2008) Ratio of metastatic lymph nodes: impact on staging and survival of gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 34:519–524
Herr HW, Bochner BH, Dalbagni G et al (2002) Impact of the number of lymph nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer. J Urol 167:1295–1298
Weir L, Speers C, D’yachkova Y et al (2002) Prognostic significance of the number of axillary lymph nodes removed in patients with node negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:1793–1799
Berger AC, Watson JC, Ross EA et al (2004) The metastatic/examined lymph node ratio is an important prognostic factor after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am Surg 70:235–240
Lee HY, Choi HJ, Park KJ et al (2007) Prognostic significance of metastatic lymph node ratio in node-positive colon carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 14:1712–1717
Berger AC, Sigurdson ER, LeVoyer T et al (2005) Colon cancer survival is associated with decreasing ratio of metastatic to examined lymph nodes. J Clin Oncol 23:8706–8712
Wang J, Hassett JM, Dayton MT et al (2008) Lymph node ratio: role in the staging of node-positive colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 15:1600–1608
Derwinger K, Carlsson G, Gustavsson B (2008) A study of lymph node ratio as a prognostic marker in colon cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 34:771–775
Trufelli DC, Miranda Vda C, Palos CC et al (2007) Positive/total dissected lymph nodes ratio as a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. Rev Assoc Med Bras 53:539–542
Schumacher P, Dineen S, Barnett C Jr et al (2007) The metastatic lymph node ratio predicts survival in colorectal cancer. Am J Surg 194:827–831
Nelson H, Petrelli N, Carlin A et al; National Cancer Institute Expert Panel (2001) Guideline 2000 for colon and rectal cancer surgery. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:583–596
Bando E, Yonemura Y, Taniguchi K et al (2002) Outcome of ratio of lymph node metastasis in gastric carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 9:775–784
American Joint Committee on Cancer (2007) Collaborative staging and coding manual. American Joint Committee on Cancer, Chicago, IL http://cancerstaging.org/cstage/manuals.html. Accessed 19 Apr 2009
Goldstein NS, Sanford W, Coffey M et al (1996) Lymph node recovery from colorectal resection specimens removed for adenocarcinoma: trends over time and a recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be recovered. Am J Clin Pathol 106:209–216
Chen SL, Bilchik AJ (2006) More extensive nodal dissection improves survival for stages I to III of colon cancer: a population-based study. Ann Surg 244:602–610
Mönig SP, Baldus SE, Zirbes TK et al (1999) Lymph node size and metastatic infiltration in colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 6:579–581
Wood TF, Saha S, Morton DL et al (2001) Validation of lymphatic mapping in colorectal cancer: in vivo, ex vivo, and laparoscopic techniques. Ann Surg Oncol 8:150–157
Hermanek P, Giedl J, Dworak O (1989) Two programs for examination of regional lymph nodes in colorectal carcinoma with regard to the new pN classification. Pathol Res Pract 185:867–873
Wong SL, Ji H, Hollenbeck BK et al (2007) Hospital lymph node examination rates and survival after resection for colon cancer. JAMA 298:2149–2154
Schrag D, Panageas KS, Riedel E et al (2003) Surgeon volume compared to hospital volume as a predictor of outcome following primary colon cancer resection. J Surg Oncol 83:68–78
Meyerhardt JA, Catalano PJ, Schrag D et al (2003) Association of hospital procedure volume and outcomes in patients with colon cancer at high risk for recurrence. Ann Intern Med 139:649–657
Herrera-Ornelas L, Justiniano J, Castillo N et al (1987) Metastases in small nodes from colon cancer. Arch Surg 122:1253–1256
Haboubi NY, Clark P, Kaftan SM et al (1992) The importance of combining xylene clearance and immunohistochemistry in the accurate staging of colorectal carcinoma. J R Soc Med 85:386–388
Palma RT, Waisberg J, Bromberg S et al (2003) Micrometastasis in regional lymph nodes of extirpated colorectal carcinoma: immunohistochemical study using anti-cytokeratin antibodies AE1/AE3. Colorectal Dis 5:164–168
Messerini L, Cianchi F, Cortesini C et al (2006) Incidence and prognostic significance of occult tumor cells in lymph nodes from patients with stage IIA colorectal carcinoma. Hum Pathol 37:1259–1267
Feinstein AR, Sosin DM, Wells CK (1985) The Will Rogers phenomenon: stage migration and new diagnostic techniques as a source of misleading statistics for survival in cancer. N Engl J Med 312:1604–1608
Inoue K, Nakane Y, Iiyama H et al (2002) The superiority of ratio-based lymph node staging in gastric carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 9:27–34
Mammen JM, James LE, Molloy M et al (2007) The relationship of lymph node dissection and colon cancer survival in the Veterans Affairs Central Cancer Registry. Am J Surg 194:349–354
Ding YB, Chen GY, Xia JG et al (2004) Correlation of tumor-positive ratio and number of perigastric lymph nodes with prognosis of patients with surgically-removed gastric carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 10:182–185
Bui L, Rempel E, Reeson D et al (2006) Lymph node counts, rates of positive lymph nodes, and patient survival for colon cancer surgery in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study. J Surg Oncol 93:439–445
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was performed within the Postgraduate Program in Healthy Science, São Francisco University Medical School, Bragança Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Priolli, D.G., Cardinalli, I.A., Pereira, J.A. et al. Metastatic lymph node ratio as an independent prognostic variable in colorectal cancer: study of 113 patients. Tech Coloproctol 13, 113–121 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-009-0467-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-009-0467-5