Skip to main content
Log in

Videoanoscope-assisted stapled haemorrhoidopexy: analysis of 18 patients

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An optimal stapled haemorrhoidopexy requires the purse-string suture to be placed circumferentially at a constant distance from the dentate line and to pass through an appropriate thickness of rectal mucosa. An unsuitable purse-string suture may increase the risk of postoperative complications. We developed a new anoscope (the videoanoscope) to prevent the difficulties during application of the purse-string suture, and we used the videoanoscope in 18 stapled haemorrhoidopexy procedures. The videoanoscope is made up of three pieces. The front part is in the form of an open half-cylinder. The second piece is a sliding lid that covers the front piece. The rear part of the anoscope includes a hollow handle in which a scope can be inserted, and the whole procedure can be transmitted to a monitor via this scope. The opening on the anoscope can be adjusted by sliding the lid. A purse-string suture is placed on the rectal mucosa protruding through this adjustable opening. The anoscope is rotated to apply the subsequent suture bites and when the starting point is reached again the purse-string is completed. Then the stapled haemorrhoidopexy procedure is continued in the usual fashion. Videoanoscope-assisted stapled haemorrhoidopexy was easily performed in 18 patients (12 men, 6 women; mean age 48.9 years). The mean operative time was 32.8 minutes. The excised rectal mucosal rings were complete in all of the patients. Optimal purse-string depth was reflected in the presence of only mucosa and submucosa in all specimens, without incorporation of muscle cells. Postoperative complications were urinary retention in one patient and bleeding in five patients, one of whom requiring sutures for haemostasis. Further studies are required to assess the potential advantages of this technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Plocek MD, Kondylis LA, Duhan-Floyd N et al (2006) Hemorrhoidopexy staple line height predicts return to work. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1905-909

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pescatori M, Aigner F (2007) Stapled transanal rectal mucosectomy ten years after. Tech Coloproctol 11:1-

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ravo B, Amato A, Bianco V et al (2002) Complications after stapled hemorrhoidectomy: can they be prevented? Tech Coloproctol 6:83-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bozdag AD, Nazli O, Tansug T et al (2007) Special anoscope for easy purse-string suture application in stapled hemorrhoidopexy. World J Surg 31:538-41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jayne DG, Seow-Choen F (2002) Modified stapled haemorrhoidopexy for the treatment of massive circumferentially prolapsing piles. Tech Coloproctol 6:191-93

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bulut A, Evcimen S, Kaya O, Hoca O (2006) Comparison of the Milligan Morgan hemorrhoidectomy and stapled hemorrhoidopexy for the treatment of the hemorrhoidal disease (in Turkish). Turk J Surg 22:67-1

    Google Scholar 

  7. Au-Yong I, Rowsell M, Hemingway DM (2004) Randomised controlled clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidectomy vs conventional haemorrhoidectomy; a three and a half year follow up. Colorectal Dis 6:37-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pescatori M, Gagliardi G (2008) Complications after procedure for prolapsing hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR). Tech Coloproctol 12:7-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ravo B, Amato A, Bianco V et al (2002) Complications after stapled haemorrhoidectomy; can they be prevented? Tech Coloproctol 6:83-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kam MH, Mathur P, Peng XH et al (2005) Correlation of histology with anorectal function following stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1437-441

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Regadas FS, Regadas SM, Rodrigues LV et al (2005) New devices for stapled rectal mucosectomy: a multicenter experience. Tech Coloproctol 9:243-46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Racalbuto A, Aliotta I, Corsaro G et al (2004) Hemorrhoidal stapler prolapsectomy vs. Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a long-term randomized trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 19:239-44

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Senagore AJ, Singer M, Abcarian H et al; Procedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids (PPH) Multicenter Study Group (2004) A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: perioperative and one-year results. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1824-836

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. D. Bozdag.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bozdag, A.D., Nazli, O., Tansug, T. et al. Videoanoscope-assisted stapled haemorrhoidopexy: analysis of 18 patients. Tech Coloproctol 12, 123–126 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-008-0410-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-008-0410-1

Keywords

Navigation