Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Anal endosonography: a survey of equipment, technique and diagnostic criteria adopted in nine Italian centers

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Anal endosonography (AES) has become an essential part of the pre-operative diagnostic workup in both organic and functional anal diseases.

Methods

Nine Italian centres with an average volume activity of >10 exams/week each were surveyed with the aim of determining the concordance with respect to indications for the procedure and interpretation of the results.

Results

Overall, anal sepsis, faecal incontinence and anorectal tumours were the more common indications for AES while evacuation dysfunctions and anal pain were not always considered indications. All centres use the same diagnostic criteria for simple and complicated perirectal sepsis and sphincteric defects, but adopt different classifications for stage 1 and stage 2 anal tumours. Participants agreed in that lymph-node staging by AES is less precise than tumour staging, especially after chemoradiation therapy.

Conclusions

A list of recommendations and guidelines based on the groups’s experience has been produced for those radiologists and coloproctologists interested in the use of AES and accreditation of their centres.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Piloni**.

Additional information

*N. Tricomi (Participants)

**V. Piloni (Chairman)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dal Corso, H.M., D'Elia, A., De Nardi, P. et al. Anal endosonography: a survey of equipment, technique and diagnostic criteria adopted in nine Italian centers. Tech Coloproctol 11, 26–33 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-007-0321-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-007-0321-6

Key words

Navigation