Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

NRAS mutations in primary and metastatic melanomas of Japanese patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Characterization of the MAPK signaling pathway in melanoma has led to the development of MEK inhibitors for the treatment of NRAS-mutated melanoma. The success of molecular-targeted therapies underscores the need to identify mutations in target genes. Most of the current data on genetic mutations have been obtained from Caucasian melanoma patients, and screenings of Asian populations are limited.

Objective

The aim of the present study was to examine NRAS mutations in primary and metastatic lesions of Japanese melanoma patients.

Methods

Clinical melanoma specimens were collected from 127 Japanese patients, including primary (n = 67), metastatic (n = 25) and paired primary and metastatic lesions (n = 35). NRAS mutations in exons 1 and 2 were assessed by polymerase chain reaction and Sanger sequencing.

Results

The incidence of NRAS mutations was 7.1 %. NRAS Q61 was the predominant genetic alteration (77.8 %). NRAS mutations were most frequently detected in acral melanomas (9.3 %), followed by melanomas without chronic sun-induced damage (7.0 %) and mucosal melanomas (4.8 %), and were not detected in melanomas with chronic sun-induced damage. In addition, NRAS mutations were more prevalent in the extremities than in other sites. The NRAS sequence in metastatic lesions did not match that of the primary tumor in one case.

Conclusion

The frequency of NRAS mutations is lower in the Asian population than in Caucasian patients. The observed heterogeneity of melanoma suggests that genotyping of both primary and metastatic lesions is important to identify candidate patients for molecular-targeted therapies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Roring M, Brummer T (2012) Aberrant b-raf signaling in human cancer—10 years from bench to bedside. Crit Rev Oncog 17:97–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Curtin JA, Fridlyand J, Kageshita T et al (2011) Distinct sets of genetic alterations in melanoma. N Engl J Med 353:2135–2147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chapman PB, Hauschild A, Robert C et al (2011) Improved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with braf v600e mutation. N Engl J Med 364:2507–2516

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Goel VK, Lazar AJ, Warneke CL et al (2006) Examination of mutations in braf, nras, and pten in primary cutaneous melanoma. J Invest Dermatol 126:154–160

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jakob JA, Bassett RL Jr, Ng CS et al (2012) Nras mutation status is an independent prognostic factor in metastatic melanoma. Cancer 118:4014–4023

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee JH, Choi JW, Kim YS (2011) Frequencies of braf and nras mutations are different in histological types and sites of origin of cutaneous melanoma: a meta-analysis. Br J Dermatol 164:776–784

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Akslen LA, Angelini S, Straume O et al (2005) Braf and nras mutations are frequent in nodular melanoma but are not associated with tumor cell proliferation or patient survival. J Invest Dermatol 125:312–317

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Devitt B, Liu W, Salemi R et al (2011) Clinical outcome and pathological features associated with nras mutation in cutaneous melanoma. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 24:666–672

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Edlundh-Rose E, Egyhazi S, Omholt K et al (2006) Nras and braf mutations in melanoma tumours in relation to clinical characteristics: a study based on mutation screening by pyrosequencing. Melanoma Res 16:471–478

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ellerhorst JA, Greene VR, Ekmekcioglu S et al (2011) Clinical correlates of nras and braf mutations in primary human melanoma. Clin Cancer Res 17:229–235

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Si L, Kong Y, Xu X et al (2012) Prevalence of braf v600e mutation in Chinese melanoma patients: large scale analysis of braf and nras mutations in a 432-case cohort. Eur J Cancer 48:94–100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou QM, Li W, Zhang X et al (2012) The mutation profiles of common oncogenes involved in melanoma in southern china. J Invest Dermatol 132:1935–1937

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ascierto PA, Schadendorf D, Berking C et al (2013) Mek162 for patients with advanced melanoma harbouring nras or val600 braf mutations: a non-randomised, open-label phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 14:249–256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ashida A, Uhara H, Kiniwa Y et al (2012) Assessment of braf and kit mutations in Japanese melanoma patients. J Dermatol Sci 66:240–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Colombino M, Capone M, Lissia A et al (2012) Braf/nras mutation frequencies among primary tumors and metastases in patients with melanoma. J Clin Oncol 30:2522–2529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Falchook GS, Lewis KD, Infante JR et al (2012) Activity of the oral mek inhibitor trametinib in patients with advanced melanoma: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial. Lancet Oncol 13:782–789

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kirkwood JM, Bastholt L, Robert C et al (2012) Phase ii, open-label, randomized trial of the mek1/2 inhibitor selumetinib as monotherapy versus temozolomide in patients with advanced melanoma. Clin Cancer Res 18:555–567

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gerlinger M, Rowan AJ, Horswell S et al (2012) Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. N Engl J Med 366:883–892

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Klein CA (2009) Parallel progression of primary tumours and metastases. Nat Rev Cancer 9:302–312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Solit DB, Garraway LA, Pratilas CA et al (2006) Braf mutation predicts sensitivity to mek inhibition. Nature 439:358–362

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of the Japanese government (AA, EO, YK, and RO) and a Grant-in-Aid from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan, Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science (HU, HK, and YK).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryuhei Okuyama.

Additional information

H. Uhara and A. Ashida contributed equally.

About this article

Cite this article

Uhara, H., Ashida, A., Koga, H. et al. NRAS mutations in primary and metastatic melanomas of Japanese patients. Int J Clin Oncol 19, 544–548 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-013-0573-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-013-0573-2

Keywords

Navigation