Skip to main content
Log in

Predictors of postoperative epidural hematomas after custom-made porous hydroxyapatite cranioplasty: a single-center experience of 194 consecutive cases

  • Research
  • Published:
Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cranioplasty is important for improving cosmesis and functional recovery after decompressive craniectomy. We assessed the incidence and predictors of post-cranioplasty epidural hematomas requiring surgical evacuation. A single-institution, retrospective study enrolled 194 consecutive patients who underwent a cranioplasty using custom-made hydroxyapatite between February 2008 and April 2022. Variables associated with postoperative epidural hematoma requiring surgical evacuation at the p < 0.1 level in unadjusted analysis were entered into multivariable analyses. Nine patients (4.6%) experienced postoperative epidural hematomas requiring evacuation, with time interval between craniectomy and cranioplasty <6 months (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 20.75, p = 0.047), cranioplasty-to-bone shift > half of the bone thickness (aOR, 17.53, p = 0.008), >10 mm difference between pre-cranioplasty and post-cranioplasty midline brain shift contralateral to the cranioplasty (aOR, 17.26, p < 0.001), and non-resorbable duraplasty (aOR, 17.43, p = 0.011) identified as independent predictors. Seventeen patients (8.8%) experienced post-cranioplasty hydrocephalus requiring shunt placement. Twenty-six patients (13.4%) experienced postoperative infection. Sixteen patients (8.2%) had postoperative epileptic seizures. The identification of independent predictors of post-cranioplasty epidural hematomas requiring surgical evacuation will help identify at-risk patients, guide prophylactic care, and reduce morbidity of this common and important procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

We support data sharing within the restrictions of the ethical approval permissions. Requests can be made to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Agner C, Dujovny M, Gaviria M (2002) Neurocognitive assessment before and after cranioplasty. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 144:1033–1040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-002-0996-4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Honeybul S, Janzen C, Kruger K, Ho KM (2013) The impact of cranioplasty on neurological function. Br J Neurosurg 27:636–641. https://doi.org/10.3109/02688697.2013.817532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Parichay PJ, Khanapure K, Joshi KC, Aniruddha TJ, Sandhya M, Hegde AS (2017) Clinical and radiological assessment of cerebral hemodynamics after cranioplasty for decompressive craniectomy - a clinical study. J Clin Neurosci Off J Neurosurg Soc Australas 42:97–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2017.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Segal DH, Oppenheim JS, Murovic JA (1994) Neurological recovery after cranioplasty. Neurosurgery 34:729–731; discussion 731. https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-199404000-00024

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Song J, Liu M, Mo X, Du H, Huang H, Xu GZ (2014) Beneficial impact of early cranioplasty in patients with decompressive craniectomy: evidence from transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 156:193–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-013-1908-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Andrabi SM, Sarmast AH, Kirmani AR, Bhat AR (2017) Cranioplasty: indications, procedures, and outcome - an institutional experience. Surg Neurol Int 8:91. https://doi.org/10.4103/sni.sni_45_17

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Stiver SI, Wintermark M, Manley GT (2008) Reversible monoparesis following decompressive hemicraniectomy for traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg 109:245–254. https://doi.org/10.3171/JNS/2008/109/8/0245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bobinski L, Koskinen L-OD, Lindvall P (2013) Complications following cranioplasty using autologous bone or polymethylmethacrylate—retrospective experience from a single center. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 115:1788–1791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.04.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chang V, Hartzfeld P, Langlois M, Mahmood A, Seyfried D (2010) Outcomes of cranial repair after craniectomy. J Neurosurg 112:1120–1124. https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.6.JNS09133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Krause-Titz UR, Warneke N, Freitag-Wolf S, Barth H, Mehdorn HM (2016) Factors influencing the outcome (GOS) in reconstructive cranioplasty. Neurosurg Rev 39:133–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-015-0678-3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hardy H, Tollard E, Derrey S, Delcampe P, Péron J-M, Fréger P, Proust F (2012) Clinical and ossification outcome of custom-made hydroxyapatite prothese for large skull defect. Neurochirurgie 58:25–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuchi.2011.09.006

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lindner D, Schlothofer-Schumann K, Kern B-C, Marx O, Müns A, Meixensberger J (2017) Cranioplasty using custom-made hydroxyapatite versus titanium: a randomized clinical trial. J Neurosurg 126:175–183. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.10.JNS151245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Stefini R, Zanotti B, Nataloni A, Martinetti R, Scafuto M, Colasurdo M, Tampieri A (2015) The efficacy of custom-made porous hydroxyapatite prostheses for cranioplasty: evaluation of postmarketing data on 2697 patients. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater 13:e136–e144. https://doi.org/10.5301/jabfm.5000211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wind JJ, Ohaegbulam C, Iwamoto FM, Black PM, Park JK (2013) Immediate titanium mesh cranioplasty for treatment of postcraniotomy infections. World Neurosurg 79:207.e11–207.e13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2011.02.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zanotti B, Zingaretti N, Verlicchi A, Robiony M, Alfieri A, Parodi PC (2016) Cranioplasty: review of materials. J Craniofac Surg 27:2061–2072. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Still M, Kane A, Roux A, Zanello M, Dezamis E, Parraga E, Sauvageon X, Meder J-F, Pallud J (2018) Independent factors affecting postoperative complication rates after custom-made porous hydroxyapatite cranioplasty: a single-center review of 109 cases. World Neurosurg 114:e1232–e1244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.03.181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, Initiative STROBE (2008) The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 61:344–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee GS, Park SQ, Kim R, Cho SJ (2015) Unexpected severe cerebral edema after cranioplasty: case report and literature review. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 58:76. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2015.58.1.76

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lillemäe K, Järviö JA, Silvasti-Lundell MK, Antinheimo JJ-P, Hernesniemi JA, Niemi TT (2017) Incidence of postoperative hematomas requiring surgical treatment in neurosurgery: a retrospective observational study. World Neurosurg 108:491–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.09.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Broughton E, Pobereskin L, Whitfield PC (2014) Seven years of cranioplasty in a regional neurosurgical centre. Br J Neurosurg 28:34–39. https://doi.org/10.3109/02688697.2013.815319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee L, Ker J, Quah BL, Chou N, Choy D, Yeo TT (2013) A retrospective analysis and review of an institution’s experience with the complications of cranioplasty. Br J Neurosurg 27:629–635. https://doi.org/10.3109/02688697.2013.815313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zanaty M, Chalouhi N, Starke RM, Clark SW, Bovenzi CD, Saigh M, Schwartz E, Kunkel ESI, Efthimiadis-Budike AS, Jabbour P, Dalyai R, Rosenwasser RH, Tjoumakaris SI (2015) Complications following cranioplasty: incidence and predictors in 348 cases. J Neurosurg 123:182–188. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.9.JNS14405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schuss P, Vatter H, Marquardt G, Imöhl L, Ulrich CT, Seifert V, Güresir E (2012) Cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: the effect of timing on postoperative complications. J Neurotrauma 29:1090–1095. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2011.2176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mukherjee S, Thakur B, Haq I, Hettige S, Martin AJ (2014) Complications of titanium cranioplasty—a retrospective analysis of 174 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 156:989–998; discussion 998. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-014-2024-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hirschmann D, Kranawetter B, Kirchschlager C, Tomschik M, Wais J, Winter F, Millesi M, Herta J, Roessler K, Dorfer C (2021) Cranioplasty following ventriculoperitoneal shunting: lessons learned. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 163:441–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04597-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Malcolm JG, Rindler RS, Chu JK, Grossberg JA, Pradilla G, Ahmad FU (2016) Complications following cranioplasty and relationship to timing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Neurosci 33:39–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2016.04.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Huang Y-H, Lee T-C, Chen W-F, Wang Y-M (2011) Safety of the nonabsorbable dural substitute in decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 71:533–537. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e318203208a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Raghavan A, Wright JM, Huang Wright C, Sajatovic M, Miller J (2018) Effect of dural substitute and technique on cranioplasty operative metrics: a systematic literature review. World Neurosurg 119:282–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sun H, Wang H, Diao Y, Tu Y, Li X, Zhao W, Ren J, Zhang S (2018) Large retrospective study of artificial dura substitute in patients with traumatic brain injury undergo decompressive craniectomy. Brain Behav 8:e00907. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.907

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Vakis A, Koutentakis D, Karabetsos D, Kalostos G (2006) Use of polytetrafluoroethylene dural substitute as adhesion preventive material during craniectomies. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 108:798–802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2005.11.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Klinger DR, Madden C, Beshay J, White J, Gambrell K, Rickert K (2014) Autologous and acrylic cranioplasty: a review of 10 years and 258 cases. World Neurosurg 82:e525–e530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2013.08.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Roth J, Galeano E, Milla S, Hartmannsgruber MW, Weiner HL (2011) Multiple epidural hematomas and hemodynamic collapse caused by a subgaleal drain and suction-induced intracranial hypotension: case report. Neurosurgery 68:E271–E275; discussion E276. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181fe6165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jeong SH, Wang US, Kim SW, Ha SW, Kim JK (2016) Symptomatic epidural fluid collection following cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury. Korean J Neurotrauma 12:6. https://doi.org/10.13004/kjnt.2016.12.1.6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Peng A, Qi W, Cao D, Zhao Y, Gao K, Cheng C, Wu Y (2018) Fibrinolytic therapy improves outcomes in patients with epidural hematomas following cranioplasty: a pilot study. J Neurol Surg Part Cent Eur Neurosurg 79:039–044. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1606848

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.B., M.S., and J.P. wrote the main manuscript text. A.E. and J.P. made the statistical analyses. J.P. prepared Fig. 1. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johan Pallud.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

An institutional review board approved the study protocol (IRB00011687, IRB#1:2022/41). The requirement to obtain informed consent was waived according to French legislation.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Marc Zanello and Johan Pallud participated equally.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bedioui, A., Elia, A., Still, M. et al. Predictors of postoperative epidural hematomas after custom-made porous hydroxyapatite cranioplasty: a single-center experience of 194 consecutive cases. Neurosurg Rev 46, 132 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-023-02039-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-023-02039-8

Keywords

Navigation