Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pre-operative embolisation of spinal tumours: neither neglect the neighbour nor blindly follow the gold standard

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A large variety of vertebral tumours undergoes transarterial embolisation (TAE) prior to surgery. However, the subsequent intra-operative blood loss is unpredictable. This retrospective analysis, aims to determine the impact of various factors that may potentially influence the estimated intra-operative blood loss (EBL) in these patients. The study included 56 consecutive patients with spinal tumours who underwent pre-operative TAE. Demographic information, treatment history, tumour type, MRI characteristics, angiographic appearance, embolisation technique and surgical invasiveness were correlated with EBL using univariate and multivariate analysis. Mean EBL was 1317 mls. On univariate analysis, haematological/primary tumours, MRI hypervascularity and selective embolisation were significantly (P < 0.05) associated with increased EBL. A total angiographic devascularisation and embolisation of additional segments above and/or below the involved level were significantly associated with decreased EBL. There was no significant association with hypervascular angiographic appearance or surgical invasiveness. MRI and angiographic hypervascularity were not entirely concordant, especially for the category of moderately vascularised metastases. After multivariate analysis, MRI hypervascularity (1434 vs. 929 mls, P = 0.018) and embolisation of additional segments (1082 vs. 1607 mls, P = 0.003) remained significantly correlated with EBL. In conclusion, during pre-operative TAE of spinal tumours, routine angiographic interrogation of additional levels above and below the involved segment should be made, with a low threshold for embolising them, if safely performable. Compared to angiographic gold standard, MRI hypervascularity is probably a better predictor of EBL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sciubba DM, Petteys RJ, Dekutoski MB, Fisher CG, Fehlings MG, Ondra SL, Rhines LD, Gokaslan ZL (2010) Diagnosis and management of metastatic spine disease. A review. J Neurosurg Spine 13(1):94–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen Y, Tai BC, Nayak D, Kumar N, Chua KH, Lim JW, Goy RWL, Wong HK (2013) Blood loss in spinal tumour surgery and surgery for metastatic spinal disease: a meta-analysis. Bone Joint J 95-B(5):683–688

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Roscoe MW, McBroom RJ, St Louis E, Grossman H, Perrin R (1989) Preoperative embolization in the treatment of osseous metastases from renal cell carcinoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 238:302–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Olerud C, Jonsson H Jr, Lofberg AM, Lorelius LE, Sjostrom L (1993) Embolization of spinal metastases reduces peroperative blood loss. 21 patients operated on for renal cell carcinoma. Acta Orthop Scand 64(1):9–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cernoch P, Hechelhammer L, von Hessling A, Spross C, Erhardt J, Jost B, Külling FA (2015) Pre-operative embolisation of spinal metastasis: technique, complication rate and outcome-clinical experience. Int Orthop 39(7):1399–1404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Manke C, Bretschneider T, Lenhart M, Strotzer M, Neumann C, Gmeinwieser J, Feuerbach S (2001) Spinal metastases from renal cell carcinoma: effect of preoperative particle embolization on intraoperative blood loss. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22(5):997–1003

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Guzman R, Dubach-Schwizer S, Heini P, Lovblad KO, Kalbermatten D, Schroth G, Remonda L (2005) Preoperative transarterial embolization of vertebral metastases. Eur Spine J 14(3):263–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hess T, Kramann B, Schmidt E, Rupp S (1997) Use of preoperative vascular embolisation in spinal metastasis resection. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 116(5):279–282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wilson MA, Cooke DL, Ghodke B, Mirza SK (2010) Retrospective analysis of preoperative embolization of spinal tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31(4):656–660

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Thiex R, Harris MB, Sides C, Bono CM, Frerichs KU (2013) The role of preoperative transarterial embolization in spinal tumors. A large single-center experience. Spine J 13(2):141–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Robial N, Charles YP, Bogorin I, Godet J, Beaujeux R, Boujan F, Steib JP (2012) Is preoperative embolization a prerequisite for spinal metastases surgical management? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98(5):536–542

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kumar N, Zaw AS, Khine HE, Maharajan K, Wai KL, Tan B, Mastura S, Goy R (2016) Blood loss and transfusion requirements in metastatic spinal tumor surgery: evaluation of influencing factors. Ann Surg Oncol 23(6):2079–2086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Denis F (1983) The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 8(8):817–831

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mamisch N, Brumann M, Hodler J, Held U, Brunner F, Steurer J, Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Outcome Study Working Group Zurich (2012) Radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of spinal stenosis: results of a Delphi survey. Radiology 264(1):174–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bode KS, Radcliff KE, Vaccaro AR (2015) MRI characterization of vascular spinal tumors. J Spinal Disord Tech 28(10):E590–E594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Prabhu VC, Bilsky MH, Jambhekar K, Panageas KS, Boland PJ, Lis E, Heier L, Nelson PK (2003) Results of preoperative embolization for metastatic spinal neoplasms. J Neurosurg 98(2 Suppl):156–164

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mirza SK, Deyo RA, Heagerty PJ, Konodi MA, Lee LA, Turner JA, Goodkin R (2008) Development of an index to characterize the “invasiveness” of spine surgery: validation by comparison to blood loss and operative time. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33(24):2651; discussion 62–2661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Griessenauer CJ, Salem M, Hendrix P, Foreman PM, Ogilvy CS, Thomas AJ (2016) Preoperative embolization of spinal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 87:362–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lonial S, Waller EK, Richardson PG, Jagannath S, Orlowski RZ, Giver CR, Jaye DL, Francis D, Giusti S, Torre C, Barlogie B, Berenson JR, Singhal S, Schenkein DP, Esseltine DL, Anderson J, Xiao H, Heffner LT, Anderson KC, SUMMIT/CREST Investigators (2005) Risk factors and kinetics of thrombocytopenia associated with bortezomib for relapsed, refractory multiple myeloma. Blood 106(12):3777–3784

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kumar N, Tan B, Zaw AS, Khine HE, Maharajan K, Lau LL, Rajendran PC, Gopinathan A (2016) The role of preoperative vascular embolization in surgery for metastatic spinal tumours. Eur Spine J 25(12):3962–3970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kobayashi K, Ozkan E, Tam A, Ensor J, Wallace MJ, Gupta S (2012) Preoperative embolization of spinal tumors: variables affecting intraoperative blood loss after embolization. Acta Radiol 53(8):935–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Berkefeld J, Scale D, Kirchner J, Heinrich T, Kollath J (1999) Hypervascular spinal tumors: influence of the embolization technique on perioperative hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 20(5):757–763

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Prince EA, Ahn SH (2013) Interventional management of vertebral body metastases. Semin Interv Radiol 30(3):278–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kato S, Murakami H, Minami T, Demura S, Yoshioka K, Matsui O, Tsuchiya H (2012) Preoperative embolization significantly decreases intraoperative blood loss during palliative surgery for spinal metastasis. Orthopedics 35(9):e1389–e1395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cuenod CA, Balvay D (2013) Perfusion and vascular permeability: basic concepts and measurement in DCE-CT and DCE-MRI. Diagn Interv Imaging 94(12):1187–1204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Elhammady MS, Wolfe SQ, Ashour R, Farhat H, Moftakhar R, Lieber BB, Aziz-Sultan MA (2010) Safety and efficacy of vascular tumor embolization using Onyx: is angiographic devascularization sufficient? J Neurosurg 112(5):1039–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Schirmer CM, Malek AM, Kwan ES, Hoit DA, Weller SJ (2006) Preoperative embolization of hypervascular spinal metastases using percutaneous direct injection with n-butyl cyanoacrylate: technical case report. Neurosurgery 59(2):E431; author reply E-2–E432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mendel E, Bourekas E, Gerszten P, Golan JD (2009) Percutaneous techniques in the treatment of spine tumors: what are the diagnostic and therapeutic indications and outcomes? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(22 Suppl):S93–S100

  29. Clarencon F, Di Maria F, Cormier E, Sourour NA, Enkaoua E, Sailhan F et al (2013) Onyx injection by direct puncture for the treatment of hypervascular spinal metastases close to the anterior spinal artery: initial experience. J Neurosurg Spine 18(6):606–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gopinathan Anil.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, J., Kumar, N.S., Tan, B.W.L. et al. Pre-operative embolisation of spinal tumours: neither neglect the neighbour nor blindly follow the gold standard. Neurosurg Rev 42, 951–959 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-018-1003-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-018-1003-8

Keywords

Navigation