Skip to main content
Log in

Flow-diverter in radiation-induced skull base carotid blowout syndrome: do not write it off!

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Post-radiotherapy carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) of the skull base is a rare but often catastrophic complication of head and neck malignancies. The existing literature on the treatment of this condition with flow-diverting devices (FDD) is extremely limited and disappointing. We present a case of impending CBS in a patient previously irradiated for nasopharyngeal cancer that was successfully treated with use of multiple FDDs, adjunctive endonasal packing and delayed reinforcement with pedicled naso-septal flap, yielding an excellent outcome at 14-months follow-up. Notwithstanding the discouraging results in literature, our anecdotal experience suggests that endovascular reconstruction using FDD could be an option with long-term viability in post-radiotherapy CBS involving the skull base when reinforced with a vascularised naso-septal flap.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chaloupka JC, Putman CM, Citardi MJ, Ross DA, Sasaki CT (1996) Endovascular therapy for the carotid blowout syndrome in head and neck surgical patients: diagnostic and managerial considerations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 17(5):843–852

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wan WS, Lai V, Lau HY, Wong YC, Poon WL, Tan CB (2013) Endovascular treatment paradigm of carotid blowout syndrome: review of 8-years experience. Eur J Radiol 82(1):95–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wong GK, Poon WS (2013) Why current evidence is against flow diverters for treatment of carotid blowout syndrome. Eur J Radiol 82(1):191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tsang AC, Leung KM, Lee R, Lui WM, Leung GK (2015) Primary endovascular treatment of post-irradiated carotid pseudoaneurysm at the skull base with the pipeline embolization device. J Neurointerv Surg 7(8):603–607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shah H, Gemmete JJ, Chaudhary N, Pandey AS, Ansari SA (2011) Acute life-threatening hemorrhage in patients with head and neck cancer presenting with carotid blowout syndrome: follow-up results after initial hemostasis with covered-stent placement. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32(4):743–747

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sylvester PT, Moran CJ, Derdeyn CP, Cross DT, Dacey RG, Zipfel GJ et al (2016 Nov) Endovascular management of internal carotid artery injuries secondary to endonasal surgery: case series and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 125(5):1256–1276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lai V, Wan WS (2013) Reply to letter to the editor “why current evidence is against flow diverters for treatment of carotid blowout syndrome”. Eur J Radiol 82(1):192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen KC, Yen TT, Hsieh YL, Chen HC, Jiang RS, Chen WH et al (2015) Postirradiated carotid blowout syndrome in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a case-control study. Head Neck 37(6):794–799

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lam JW, Chan JY, Lui WM, Ho WK, Lee R, Tsang RK (2014) Management of pseudoaneurysms of the internal carotid artery in postirradiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. Laryngoscope 124(10):2292–2296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Adel M, Chang KP (2016) Using a nasoseptal flap for the reconstruction of osteoradionecrosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a case report. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 45:27

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gopinathan Anil.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was recieved.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical review

No ethics committee approval required for case reports at our institute.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from the patient for publishing this as a case report.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anil, G., Zhang, J., Ong, Y.K. et al. Flow-diverter in radiation-induced skull base carotid blowout syndrome: do not write it off!. Neurosurg Rev 40, 685–688 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-017-0875-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-017-0875-3

Keywords

Navigation