Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Factors predicting growth of vestibular schwannoma in neurofibromatosis type 2

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We retrospectively reviewed characteristics of patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 to identify factors predicting further growth of bilateral vestibular schwannomas. Subjects comprised 27 neurofibromatosis type 2 patients with 54 vestibular schwannomas, followed for 24–204 months (mean, 86 months). This study investigated factors predictive of vestibular schwannoma growth in neurofibromatosis type 2. Features distinguishing actively growing from quiescent VS were determined for untreated course (28 vestibular schwannomas) and posttreatment course (including either resection or radiosurgery; 33 vestibular schwannomas). A general estimation equation was used to identify factors affecting tumor growth. During the untreated course, 19 vestibular schwannomas showed growth and 9 vestibular schwannomas were stable. No factors predictive of growth were shown. During the posttreatment course (23 surgical resections, ten radiosurgeries), ten treatments were followed by growth and 23 were followed by stability, with growth showing an association with onset at an early age (p = 0.007). Multivariate analysis identified no factors predictive of growth. After treatment, close follow-up is warranted for patients with onset at an early age.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rouleau GA, Merel P, Lutchman M et al (1993) Alteration in a new gene encoding a putative membrane-organizing protein causes neuro-fibromatosis type 2. Nature 363:515–521

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Trofatter JA, MacCollin MM, Rutter JL et al (1993) A novel moesin-, ezrin-, radixin-like gene is a candidate for the neurofibromatosis 2 tumor suppressor. Cell 72:791–800

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Malis LI (1998) Neurofibromatosis type 2 and central neurofibromatosis. Neurosurg Focus 4(3):e1

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. The Consensus Development Panel (1994) National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference–Statement on Acoustic Neuroma, December 11–13, 1991. Arch Neurol 51:201–207

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aguiar PH, Tatagiba M, Samii M, Dankoweit-Timpe E, Ostertag H (1995) The comparison between the growth fraction of bilateral vestibular schwannomas in neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) and unilateral vestibular schwannomas using the monoclonal antibody MIB 1. Acta Neurochir 134:40–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Evans DG, Baser ME, O'Reilly B et al (2005) Management of the patient and family with neurofibromatosis 2: a consensus conference statement. Br J Neurosurg 19:5–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Baser ME, Makariou EV, Parry DM (2002) Predictors of vestibular schwannoma growth in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2. J Neurosurg 96:217–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mautner VF, Baser ME, Thakkar SD et al (2002) Vestibular schwannoma growth in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2: a longitudinal study. J Neurosurg 96:223–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Evans DG, Huson SM, Donnai D et al (1992) A genetic study of type 2 neurofibromatosis in the United Kingdom. I. Prevalence, mutation rate, fitness, and confirmation of maternal transmission effect on severity. J Med Genet 29:841–846

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mautner VF, Lindenau M, Baser ME et al (1996) The neuroimaging and clinical spectrum of neurofibromatosis 2. Neurosurgery 38:880–885

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Otsuka G, Saito K, Nagatani T, Yoshida J (2003) Age at symptom onset and long-term survival in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2. J Neurosurg 99:480–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Baser ME, Friedman JM, Aeschliman D et al (2002) Predictors of the risk of mortality in neurofibromatosis 2. Am J Hum Genet 71:715–723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Evans DG, Trueman L, Wallace A, Collins S, Strachan T (1998) Genotype/phenotype correlations in type 2 neurofibromatosis (NF2): evidence for more severe disease associated with truncating mutations. J Med Genet 35:450–455

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kluwe L, Bayer S, Baser ME et al (1996) Identification of NF2 germ-line mutations and comparison with neurofibromatosis 2 phenotypes. Hum Genet 98:534–538

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kluwe L, MacCollin M, Tatagiba M et al (1998) Phenotypic variability associated with 14 splice-site mutations in the NF2 gene. Am J Med Genet 77:228–233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Parry DM, MacCollin MM, Kaiser-Kupfer MI et al (1996) Germ-line mutations in the neurofibromatosis 2 gene: correlations with disease severity and retinal abnormalities. Am J Hum Genet 59:529–539

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ruttledge MH, Andermann AA, Phelan CM et al (1996) Type of mutation in the neurofibromatosis type 2 gene (NF2) frequently determines severity of disease. Am J Hum Genet 59:331–342

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Baser ME, Kuramoto L, Woods R et al (2005) The location of constitutional neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) splice site mutations is associated with the severity of NF2. J Med Genet 42:540–546

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Subach BR, Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD et al (1999) Stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of acoustic neuromas associated with neurofibromatosis type 2. J Neurosurg 90:815–822

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sobel RA (1993) Vestibular (acoustic) schwannomas: histologic features in neurofibromatosis 2 and in unilateral cases. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 52:106–113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hamada Y, Iwaki T, Fukui M et al (1997) A comparative study of embedded nerve tissue in six NF2-associated schwannomas and 17 nonassociated NF2 schwannomas. Surg Neurol 48:395–400

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jaaskelainen J, Paetau A, Pyykko I et al (1994) Interface between the facial nerve and large acoustic neurinomas. Immunohistochemical study of the cleavage plane in NF2 and non-NF2 cases. J Neurosurg 80:541–547

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Samii M, Matthies C, Tatagiba M (1997) Management of vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): auditory and facial nerve function after resection of 120 vestibular schwannomas in patients with neurofibromatosis 2. Neurosurgery 40:696–705

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kiyoshi Saito.

Additional information

Comments

Cordula Matthies, Würzburg, Germany

Ito and colleagues present a thorough analysis on individual tumor progression in neurofibromatosis type 2. While the stability of vestibular schwannomas (1) under observation, (2) after surgery, or (3) after radiosurgery is the focus of their study, they have investigated the related incidences of further cranial or spinal tumors in the individual cases.

Despite analysis of such individual tumor manifestation and of all general patient parameters, only young age was identified as a reliable parameter predicting some progression. In case of tumor progression, the average age was 16.7 years compared with 30.2 years in tumor stability; this was most obvious in the treated course and, to a milder extent, also clears in the untreated course.

Still, a few parameters might give a hint towards increased risk of progression, though no statistical significance could be found: In NF2 patients with untreated course, the incidence of tumor growth appeared somewhat higher if cranial meningiomas or spinal tumors were present, factors which we associate with a more severe phenotypic NF manifestation. A fundamental difficulty is inherent to this study: comparison of treated and untreated course neglects a preselection as patients with a rather quiet course were more likely to be in the observed group.

In conclusion, it might be interesting to analyze the different genetic mutations in these different observation and treatment groups.

Differing from sporadic schwannomas, treatment in neurofibromatosis type 2 is never curative and often incomplete on purpose with regard to functional preservation of cranial nerves. Therefore, the likelihood of tumor progression or stability will remain a major issue in neurofibromatosis type 2; if factors predicting relative disease stability were identified, surgical decisions on indication, timing, and radicality could be based on more sound grounds.

Comments

Nobutaka Kawahara, Yokohama, Japan

Management of vestibular schwannomas associated with NF 2 is difficult. In particular, how to preserve hearing and when to intervene surgically or radiosurgically are still controversial issues. In addition, some tumors appear to behave differently when compared with solitary VS. Since some VSs are conservatively managed when useful hearing remains, it would be helpful in decision making if factors which predict further tumor growth are available.

In this article, the authors tried to identify these factors in untreated and posttreatment courses. Unfortunately, they could not identify factors predicting tumor growth in untreated courses. However, 19 out of 28 tumors grew (68%). This number may be high when compared with that in solitary VS, which is reported to be 40 % in systematic review (Yoshimoto et al. J Neurosurg 103:59–63, 2005). In the posttreatment course, they identified onset at an early age as a factor associated with growth. This would be a reasonable result when considering that NF 2 is a genetic disease. Somewhat surprising is the negative result of treatment (surgery vs. radiosurgery), though there was a trend for better control of tumor in favor of radiosurgery when residual tumor is present. To clarify these predictive factors, increased number of patients and prospective design of the study would be required as demonstrated in meta-analysis (Yoshimoto et al. J Neurosurg 103:59–63, 2005). The authors are encouraged to continue the study in a prospective way.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ito, E., Saito, K., Yatsuya, H. et al. Factors predicting growth of vestibular schwannoma in neurofibromatosis type 2. Neurosurg Rev 32, 425–433 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-009-0223-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-009-0223-3

Keywords

Navigation