Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

CT of suspected thoracic acute aortic injury in the emergency department: is routine abdominopelvic imaging worth the additional collective radiation dose?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the incidence of non-traumatic acute aortic injury (AAI) extending from the chest into the abdomen or pelvis in emergency department (ED) patients with acute aortic syndrome (AAS), to estimate the effective dose of the abdominopelvic portion of these CT exams, and to compare the number needed to screen (NNS) with the collective population radiation dose of imaging those stations. All patients (n = 238) presenting to the ED with AAS between March 2014 and June 2015 who were imaged per CT AAI protocol (noncontrast and contrast-enhanced CT angiography of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis) were retrospectively identified in this IRB-approved HIPAA-compliant study. The Stanford classification for positive cases of AAI was further subclassified based on chest, abdominal, or pelvic involvement. The dose length product (DLP) of each exam was used to estimate the dose of the abdominal and pelvic stations and the collective effective dose for the population. There were five cases of aortic dissection (AD) and two of intramural hematoma (IMH), with an AAI incidence of 2.9/100. Three cases of AAI were confined to the chest. Two cases of AAI were confined to the chest and abdomen, and two cases involved the chest, abdomen, and pelvis. There was only one case of AAI involving the ascending aorta that extended into the abdomen or pelvis. The number needed to screen to identify (a) AAI extending from the chest into the abdomen or pelvis was 59.5 and (b) Stanford A AAI extending into the abdomen or pelvis was 238. The estimated mean effective dose for the abdominopelvic stations were unenhanced abdomen 2.3 mSv, unenhanced pelvis 3.3 mSv, abdominal CTA 2.5 mSv, and pelvic CTA 3.6 mSv. The collective effective doses to the abdomen and pelvis with unenhanced CT and CTA in 59.5 patients and 238 patients were 761.6 and 3046.4 mSv, respectively. While the estimated mean effective dose for imaging of the abdominopelvic stations are low, the collective effective dose should also be considered. It may be beneficial to modify or omit routine unenhanced CT and/or CTA of the abdomen/pelvis in this patient population in the absence of abdominal symptoms, and image the abdomen and pelvis in positive thoracic cases only.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Chart 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ridge CA, Litmanovich DE (2015) Acute aortic syndromes: current status. J Thorac Imaging 30:193–201. doi:10.1097/RTI.0000000000000155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Maddu KK, Shuaib W, Telleria J, Johnson J, Khosa F (2014) Nontraumatic acute aortic emergencies: part 1, acute aortic syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202:656–665. doi:10.2214/AJR.13.11437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hagan PG, Nienaber CA, Isselbacher EM, Bruckman D, Karavite DJ, Russman PL, Evangelista A, Fattori R, Suzuki T, Oh JK, et al. (2000) The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD): new insights into an old disease. JAMA 283:897–903

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ganaha F, Miller DC, Sugimoto K, Do YS, Minamiguchi H, Saito H, Mitchell RS, Dake MD (2002) Prognosis of aortic intramural hematoma with and without penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer: a clinical and radiological analysis. Circulation 106:342–348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brinster DR (2009) Endovascular repair of the descending thoracic aorta for penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer disease. J Card Surg 24:203–208. doi:10.1111/j.1540-8191.2008.00660.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Daily PO, Trueblood HW, Stinson EB, Wuerflein RD, Shumway NE (1970) Management of acute aortic dissections. Ann Thorac Surg 10:237–247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. DeBakey ME, Henly WS, Cooley DA, Morris GC, Crawford ES, Beall AC (1965) Surgical management of dissecting aneurysms of the aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 49:130–149

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nienaber CA, von Kodolitsch Y, Petersen B, Loose R, Helmchen U, Haverich A, Spielmann RP (1995) Intramural hemorrhage of the thoracic aorta. Diagnostic and therapeutic implications Circulation 92:1465–1472

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chao CP, Walker TG, Kalva SP (2009) Natural history and CT appearances of aortic intramural hematoma. Radiographics 29:791–804. doi:10.1148/rg.293085122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Clouse WD, Hallett JWJ, Schaff HV, Spittell PC, Rowland CM, Ilstrup DM, Melton LJ (2004) Acute aortic dissection: population-based incidence compared with degenerative aortic aneurysm rupture. Mayo Clin Proc 79:176–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Braverman AC (2010) Acute aortic dissection: clinician update. Circulation 122:184–188. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.958975

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McMahon MA, Squirrell CA (2010) Multidetector CT of aortic dissection: a pictorial review. Radiographics 30:445–460. doi:10.1148/rg.302095104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Abbas A, Brown IW, Peebles CR, Harden SP, Shambrook JS (2014) The role of multidetector-row CT in the diagnosis, classification and management of acute aortic syndrome. Br J Radiol 87:20140354. doi:10.1259/bjr.20140354

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Shiga T, Wajima Z, Apfel CC, Inoue T, Ohe Y (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of transesophageal echocardiography, helical computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging for suspected thoracic aortic dissection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 166:1350–1356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Williams DM, LePage MA, Lee DY (1997) The dissected aorta: part I. Early anatomic changes in an in vitro model. Radiology 203:23–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Swee W, Dake MD (2008) Endovascular management of thoracic dissections. Circulation 117:1460–1473. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.690966

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Garzon G, Fernandez-Velilla M, Marti M, Acitores I, Ybanez F, Riera L (2005) Endovascular stent-graft treatment of thoracic aortic disease. Radiographics 25:S229–S244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Patel PJ, Grande W, Hieb RA (2011) Endovascular management of acute aortic syndromes. Semin Intervent Radiol 28:10–23. doi:10.1055/s-0031-1273936

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Larson DB, Johnson LW, Schnell BM, Salisbury SR, Forman HP (2011) National trends in CT use in the emergency department: 1995-2007. Radiology 258:164–173. doi:10.1148/radiol.10100640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hayter RG, Rhea JT, Small A, Tafazoli FS, Novelline RA (2006) Suspected aortic dissection and other aortic disorders: multi-detector row CT in 373 cases in the emergency setting. Radiology 238:841–852

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Thoongsuwan N, Stern EJ (2002) Chest CT scanning for clinical suspected thoracic aortic dissection: beware the alternate diagnosis. Emerg Radiol 9:257–261

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lovy AJ, Rosenblum JK, Levsky JM, Godelman A, Zalta B, Jain VR, Haramati LB (2013) Acute aortic syndromes: a second look at dual-phase CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200:805–811. doi:10.2214/AJR.12.8797

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Lempel JK, Frazier AA, Jeudy J, Kligerman SJ, Schultz R, Ninalowo HA, Gozansky EK, Griffith B, White CS (2014) Aortic arch dissection: a controversy of classification. Radiology 271:848–855. doi:10.1148/radiol.14131457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Deak PD, Smal Y, Kalender WA (2010) Multisection CT protocols: sex- and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product. Radiology 257:158–166. doi:10.1148/radiol.10100047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Christner JA, Kofler JM, McCollough CH (2010) Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:881–889. doi:10.2214/AJR.09.3462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cho KR, Stanson AW, Potter DD, Cherry KJ, Schaff HV, Sundt TM (2004) Penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer of the descending thoracic aorta and arch. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 127:1393–1399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Vilacosta I, San Roman JA, Aragoncillo P, Ferreiros J, Mendez R, Graupner C, Batlle E, Serrano J, Pinto A, Oyonarte JM (1998) Penetrating atherosclerotic aortic ulcer: documentation by transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 32:83–89

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chung JH, Ghoshhajra BB, Rojas CA, Dave BR, Abbara S (2010) CT angiography of the thoracic aorta. Radiol Clin N Am 48:249–264. doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2010.02.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rehani MM (2015) I am confused about the cancer risks associated with CT: how can we summarize what is currently known? AJR Am J Roentgenol 205:W2–W3. doi:10.2214/AJR.15.14363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sodickson A, Baeyens PF, Andriole KP, Prevedello LM, Nawfel RD, Hanson R, Khorasani R (2009) Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults. Radiology 251:175–184. doi:10.1148/radiol.2511081296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yoo SM, Lee HY, White CS (2010) MDCT evaluation of acute aortic syndrome. Radiol Clin N Am 48:67–83. doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2009.09.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Vlahos I, Godoy MCB, Naidich DP (2010) Dual-energy computed tomography imaging of the aorta. J Thorac Imaging 25:289–300. doi:10.1097/RTI.0b013e3181dc2b4c

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Shaida N, Bowden DJ, Barrett T, Godfrey EM, Taylor A, Winterbottom AP, See TC, Lomas DJ, Shaw AS (2012) Acceptability of virtual unenhanced CT of the aorta as a replacement for the conventional unenhanced phase. Clin Radiol 67:461–467. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2011.10.023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Toepker M, Moritz T, Krauss B, Weber M, Euller G, Mang T, Wolf F, Herold CJ, Ringl H (2012) Virtual non-contrast in second-generation, dual-energy computed tomography: reliability of attenuation values. Eur J Radiol 81:e398–e405. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.12.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Jacobs JE, Latson Jr LA, Abbara S, Akers SR, Araoz PA, Cummings KW, Cury RC, Dorbala S, Earls JP, Hoffmann U et al ACR Appropriateness Criteria: acute chest pain—suspected aortic dissection. Available at https://acsearch.acr.org/docs/69402/Narrative/ American College of Radiology. Last Revision 2014; Accessed March 15, 2016

  36. Hiratzka LF, Bakris GL, Beckman JA, Bersin RM, Carr VF, Casey DEJ, Eagle KA, Hermann LK, Isselbacher EM, Kazerooni EA, et al. (2010) 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine. Circulation 121:e266–e369. doi:10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181d4739e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, The George Washington University Medical Faculty Associates, George Washington University Hospital, 900 23rd St NW, Washington, DC, 20037, USA

    Shawn Haji-Momenian, Myles Taffel, Nadia Khati & Robert Zeman

  2. The George Washington University School of Medicine, 2300 I St NW, Washington, DC, 20052, USA

    Jonathan Rischall & Neil Okey

Authors
  1. Shawn Haji-Momenian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jonathan Rischall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Neil Okey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Myles Taffel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nadia Khati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Robert Zeman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shawn Haji-Momenian.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haji-Momenian, S., Rischall, J., Okey, N. et al. CT of suspected thoracic acute aortic injury in the emergency department: is routine abdominopelvic imaging worth the additional collective radiation dose?. Emerg Radiol 24, 13–20 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-016-1435-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-016-1435-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation