Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Regional changes in nitrate loadings in the Upper Mississippi River Basin under predicted mid-century climate

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Regional Environmental Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Upper Mississippi River Basin (UMRB) drains an area of 492,000 km2 primarily from five states in the central US. Alterations in climate variability and change will lead to changes in hydrologic behavior of the region with implications in the fate and transport of nutrient loadings. This impact assessment study evaluated the long-term changes in annual water yield and nitrogen loadings in the UMRB using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), with mid-century (2046–2065) climate change projections as predicted by the ensemble of ten general circulation models. Predicted precipitation change ranged from −1.6 to 6.3 % at the subwatershed level while the mean temperature was found to be more consistent over the entire basin with an average increase of 2.8 °C. The SWAT-predicted streamflow decreased by 5 % on an average annual basis at the watershed outlet (Grafton, Illinois) with significant monthly variation. Streamflow increased during the winter months of December, January, and February and decreased during the summer with up to a 41 % reduction in July. The nitrogen loading pattern was found to vary widely from a decrease of 3 kg/ha to an increase of 8 kg/ha at the subwatershed level, with an average increase of 1 kg/ha over the entire basin. Portions of the UMRB in Illinois are expected to shift toward adverse conditions for nitrogen loading (and thus greater potential for exporting), whereas portions of the UMRB in Iowa are expected to experience a decrease in nitrogen loads under predicted mid-century climatic conditions for the existing land and nutrient management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander RB, Smith RA, Schwarz GE, Boyer EW, Nolan JV, Brakebill JW (2008) Differences in phosphorus and nitrogen delivery to the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River Basin. Environ Sci Technol 42:822–830

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah S, Williams JR (1998) Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment; part I: model development. J Am Water Res Assoc 34(1):73–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Forbs KA, Kienzle SW, Coburn CA, Byrne JM (2010) Simulating the hydrological response to predicted climate change on watershed in southern Alberta, Canada. Clim Change 105:555–576. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9890-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gassman PW, Secchi S, Jha MK, Kurkalova L (2006) Upper Mississippi River Basin modeling system part 1: SWAT input data requirements and issues. In: Singh VP, Xu YJ (eds) Coastal Hydrology and Processes. Water Resources Publications, Highland Ranch, CO, ISBN: 1-887201-46-7

  • Gassman PW, Reyes M, Green CH, Arnold JG (2007) The soil and water assessment tool: historical development, applications, and future directions. Trans Am Soc Ag Biol Eng. 50(4):1211–1250

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2001) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group 1 to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, In: Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, van der Linden PJ, Dai X, Maskell K., Johnson CA (eds) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 881

  • IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 976

  • Jha MK, Pan Z, Takle ES, Gu R (2004) Impact of climate change on stream flow in the Upper Mississippi River Basin: a regional climate model perspective. J Geophys Res 109:D09105. doi:10.1029/2003JD003686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jha MK, Gassman PW, Secchi S, Arnold JG (2006) Upper Mississippi River Basin modeling system part 2: baseline simulation results. In: Singh VP, Xu YJ (eds) Coastal hydrology and processes. Water Resources Publications, Highland Ranch, CO, ISBN: 1-887201-46-7

  • Jin X, Sridhar V (2012) Impacts of climate change on hydrology and water resources in the Boise and Spokane River Basins. J Am Water Res Assoc 48(2):197–220. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00605x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR (2005) Soil and water assessment tool: user manual, version 2000. Texas Water Resour. Inst TR-192. GSWRL 02-02, BRC 02-06. p 455. Available at: http://swat.tamu.edu/media/1292/SWAT2005theory.pdf

  • PCMDI (2005) Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison (PCMDI). http://www-pcmdi.llnl.gov/

  • Rabotyagov S, Campbell T, Jha MK, Gassman PW, Arnold JG, Kurkalova L, Secchi S, Feng H, Kling CL (2010) Least cost control of agricultural nutrient contributions to the Gulf of Mexico Hypoxic Zone. Ecol Appl 20(6):1542–1555. doi:10.1890/08-0680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson DM, Schwarz GE, Saad DA, Alexander RB (2009) Incorporating uncertainty into the ranking of SPARROW model nutrient yields from Mississippi/Atchafalaya River Basin Watersheds. J Am Water Res Assoc 45(2):534–549. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2009.00310.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runkel RL, Crawford CG, Cohn TA (2004) Load estimator (LOADEST): a FORTRAN program for estimating constituent loads in streams and rivers. USGS Techniques and Methods Book 4, Chap A5. US Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia

  • Secchi S, Gassman PW, Jha MK, Kurkalova L, Kling CL (2011) Potential water quality changes due to corn expansion in the Upper Mississippi River Basin. Ecol Appl 21(4):1068–1084. doi:10.1890/09-0619.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takle ES, Jha MK, Anderson CJ (2005) Hydrological cycle in the Upper Mississippi River Basin: 20th century simulations by multiple GCMs. Geophys Res Lett 32:L18407. doi:10.1029/2005GL023630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US EPA SAB [US Environmental Protection Agency, Science Advisory Board] (2007) Hypoxia in the northern Gulf of Mexico: an update by the EPA Science Advisory Board. EPA-SAB-08-004. EPA Science Advisory Board, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington

  • USGS (2012) Federal Standards and Procedures for the National Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD). Techniques and Methods 11-A3, Chapter 3 of Section A, Federal Standards Book 11, Collection and Delineation of Spatial Data, Third edition. US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey, Reston, VA and US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington. Available at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/tm11a3/

  • Wu L, Liu S, Abdul-Aziz OI (2012) Hydrological effects of the increased CO2 and climate change in the Upper Mississippi River Basin using a modified SWAT. Clim Change 110:977–1003. doi:10.1007/s/10584-011-0087-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was partially funded by the National Science Foundation, Award No. DEB1010259, Understanding Land Use Decisions & Watershed Scale Interactions: Water Quality in the Mississippi River Basin & Hypoxic Conditions in the Gulf of Mexico, and by the US Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Award No. 20116800230190, Climate Change, Mitigation, and Adaptation in Corn-Based Cropping Systems.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manoj K. Jha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jha, M.K., Gassman, P.W. & Panagopoulos, Y. Regional changes in nitrate loadings in the Upper Mississippi River Basin under predicted mid-century climate. Reg Environ Change 15, 449–460 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0539-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0539-y

Keywords

Navigation