Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Development and non-indigenous species at the global scale

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Regional Environmental Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the explanatory power of development, prosperity and regulatory capability as proximate causes of non-indigenous species (NIS) occurrence in different countries, doing this by statistically analysing a global cross-sectional data set. Since the quantification of development is subject to much discussion, two different indicators are tested: gross domestic product (GDP) per capita and the United Nations human development index (HDI). A corruption index is used as an indicator of regulatory capacity. In addition, variables capturing country openness, which facilitates NIS introduction, and habitat conditions, which determine NIS establishment, are included as explanatory variables. The GDP indicator together with the corruption index fits the NIS data best, where the number of NIS is higher in countries with larger incomes. However, countries with relatively high income but low institutional capacity show a larger number of NIS than countries with a similar level of income but with higher institutional capacity. The results also point to the significant contributions of openness and habitat fragmentation to NIS occurrences in the countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aidt T, Dutta J, Sena V (2008) Governance regimes, corruption and growth: theory and evidence. J Comp Econ 36(2):195–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blossey B, Notzold R (1995) Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants–a hypothesis. J Ecol 83:887–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Born W, Rauschmayer BräuerI (2005) Economic evaluation of biological invasions: a survey. Ecol Econ 55:321–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CIA (Central Intelligence Agency) (2008) The World factbook, available at https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html. Accessed 01 Jun 2008

  • Clavero M, Garcia-Berthou E (2005) Invasive species are a leading cause of animal extinctions. Trends Ecol Evol 20:110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalmazzone S (2000) Economic factors affecting vulnerability to biological invasions. In: Perrings C, Williamson M, Dalmazzone S (eds) The economics of biological invasions. Edward Elgar, UK, pp 7–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta S, Laplante B, Wang H, Wheeler D (2002) Confronting the environmental Kuznets curve. J Econ Perspect 16:147–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djankov S, La Porta R, Lopez de Silanes F, Shleifer A (2008) The law and economics of self-dealing. J Financ Econ 88(3):430–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston K, Jones A, Hanel C, Chown SH (2003) Rates of species introduction to a remote oceanic island. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 270:1091–1098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gren IM (2008) Economics of management of invasive alien species–choosing targets and policies. Boreal Environ Res 13:17–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Gren IM, Isacs L, Carlsson M (2009a) Costs of invasive alien species in Sweden. Ambio 38(3):135–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gren IM, Campos M, Edsman L, Bohman P (2009b) Incomes, attitudes and spread of invasive species: an application to signal crayfish in Sweden. Environ Manage 43(2):210–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gren IM, Thierfelder T, Berglund H (2010) Country characteristics and non-indigenous species. Environment and development economics (in press)

  • Grossman G, Krueger A (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Quart J Econ 110(2):353–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn J, Ham JC, Moon HR (2010) The Hausman test and weak instruments. Journal of Econometrics, Corrected Proof, Available online 17 Sept 2010 (in press)

  • Horan R, Lupi F (2005) Tradable risk permits to prevent future introductions of invasive alien species into the Great Lakes. Ecol Econ 52:289–304

    Google Scholar 

  • ISSG (Invasive Species Specialist Group) (2008) Global invasive species database, available at http://www.issg.org/database. Accessed 27 May 2008

  • IUCN (International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources) (2008) Red list database expert search, available at http://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/2008RL_stats_table_6b_v1223294385.pdf. Accessed 01 Oct 2008

  • Knowler D, Barbier E (2000) The economics of invading space: a theoretical model and a case study application. In: Perring C, Williamson M, Dalmazzone S (eds) The economics of biological invasions. Edward Elgar, UK, pp 70–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin W, Zhou G, Cheng X, Xu R (2007) Fast economic development accelerates biological invasions in China. PLoS One 11:e1208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovell SJ, Stone S (2005) The economic impacts of aquatic in invasive species: a review of the literature. NCEE (National Center for Environmental Economics). US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson L (2006) The economics of terrestrial invasive species: a review of the literature. Agric Resour Econ Rev 35(1):178–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrings C, Williamson M, Dalmazzone S (2000) The economics of biological invasions. Edward Elgar, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D, McNair S, Janecka J, Wightman J, Simmonds C, O’Conell C, Wong E, Russel L, Zern J, Aquino T, Tsomondo T (2001) Economic and environmental threats of alien plant, animal, and microbe invasions. Agric Ecosyst Environ 84:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma G, Esler K, Blignaut J (2010) Determining the relationship between invasive alien species’ density and a country’s socio-economic status. South Afr J Sci 106(3/4):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea K, Chesson P (2002) Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 17:170–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shogren J, Tschirhart J (2005) Integrating ecology and economics to address bioinvasions. Ecol Econ 52:267–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern DJ (2004) The rise and the fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Dev 32(8):1419–1439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Transparency International (2009) 2008 Corruption perceptions index table, available at http://www.transparency.org/news_room/in_focus/2008/cpi2008/cpi_2008_table. Accessed 10 Jan 2009

  • UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (2008) Statistics of the human development report, available at http://origin-hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/.Accessed 06 Sept 2009

  • UNSTATS (United Nations Statistics Division) (2008) National Accounts main aggregates database, available at http://unstats.un.org/unsd/snaama/SelectionQuick.asp. Accessed 10 Oct 2008

  • Vermeij GI (1991) When biotas meet: understanding biotic interchange. Science 253:1099–1104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeij G, Roopnarine P (2008) The coming arctic invasion. Science 321:780–781

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vilà M, Pujadas J (2001) Land-use and socio–economic correlates of plant invasions in European and North African countries. Biol Conserv 100:397–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White P, Ford A, Clout M, Engeman R, Roy S, Saunders G (2008) Alien invasive vertebrates in ecosystems: pattern, process and the social dimension. Wildl Res 35:171–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson M, Fitter A (1996) The characteristics of successful invaders. Biol Conserv 78:163–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WTO (World Trade Organisation) (2008) Trade profiles, tariff and trade statistics available at http://stat.wto.org/CountryProfile/WSDBCountryPFReporter.aspx?Language=E. Accessed 29 Sept 2008

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors greatly appreciate valuable comments from two anonymous reviewers and the financial support from the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning (FORMAS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ing-Marie Gren.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 4 and 5.

Table 4 Correlation matrix
Table 5 Results of linear models with two different specification of development, n = 136

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gren, IM., Campos, M. Development and non-indigenous species at the global scale. Reg Environ Change 11, 593–601 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-010-0183-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-010-0183-8

Keywords

Navigation