Abstract
This paper reports a field study of work in a complex setting:an airport. The study was largely focused on the Air Traffic Control activities carried out in the airport control tower, but also investigated other work sites around the airport. An important feature of the successful operation of the airport, then, is the way that the activities occurring in these different sites become articulated through explicit communicative acts and through common understandings of the work of the airport. The airport is viewed as a common information space, a perspective that emphasises meaning and interpretation and the processes by which meanings become common across a heterogeneous work system. A characteristic of the environment studied here is that while meanings may not be common across the different communities of practice working at the airport, interpretations appear to be sufficiently common as to pose few problems in most circumstances.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bannon L (2000) Understanding common information spaces in CSCW. In: Workshop on common information spaces. Copenhagen, Denmark
Bannon L, Bødker S (1997) Constructing common information spaces. In: European conference on computer supported cooperative work ECSCW’97
Berndtsson J, Normark M (1999) The coordinative functions of flight strips: air traffic control work revisited. In: ACM GROUP’99 - international conference on supporting group work
Berndtsson J, Normark M (2005) Coordination in air traffic control work: the Copenhagen field studies. COTCOS network report http://www-sv.cict.fr/cotcos/ (cited on 12 May 2005)
Bertelsen O, Bødker S (2001) Cooperation in massively distributed information spaces. In: Prinz W, Jarke M, Rogers Y, Schmidt K, Vulf V (eds) ECSCW 2001: proceedings of the seventh European conference on computer supported cooperative work, Kluwer, Dordrecht
Bossen C (2002) The parameters of common information spaces: the heterogeneity of cooperative work at a hospital ward. In: Proceedings of computer supported cooperative work CSCW’02. ACM Press, NY
Clark HH (1996). Using language. Cambridge University Press
Clement A, Wagner I (1995) Fragmented exchange: disarticulation and the need for regionalized communication spaces. In: Marmolin H, Sundblad Y, Schmidt K (eds) ECSCW ’95: proceedings of the fourth European conference on computer supported cooperative work
Cole M (1996) Cultural psychology - a once and future discipline, Harvard University Press, MA
Crowston K (1997) A coordination theory approach to organizational process design. Organ Sci 8(2):157–175
Donellon A, Gray B, Bougon MG (1986) Communication, meaning, and organized action. Adm Sci Q 31:43–55
Erickson T, Kellog WA (2003) Social translucence: using minimalist visualisations of social activity to support collective interaction. In: Höök K, Benyon D, Munro AJ (eds) Designing information spaces: the social navigation approach. Springer, NY, pp 17–42
Faraj S, Sproull L (2000) Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Manage Sci 46(12):1154–1168
Fields B, Duncker E (2003) Articulating resources: the impact of electronic health records on cross-professional healthcare work. In: Adams A, Kostkova P (eds) Healthcare digital libraries’03, ECDL. Trondheim, Norway
Fields RP, Wright P Marti, Palmonari M (1998). Air traffic control as a distributed cognitive system: a case study of external representations. In: Green TRG, Bannon L, Warren CP, Buckley J (eds) ECCE9: proceedings of the ninth European conference on cognitive Ergonomics. EACE.
Garbis C (2002) Exploring the openness of cognitive artefacts in cooperative process management. Cogn Technol Work 4:9–21
Halverson CA (1994) Distributed cognition as a theoretical framework for HCI: don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater - the importance of the cursor in air traffic control. Cognitive Science Department, UCSD Report, 9403
Harper RHR, Hughes JA (1993) What a f-ing system! Send ’em all to the same place and then expect us to stop ’em hitting: making technology work in air traffic control. In: Button G (ed) Technology in working order: studies of work, interaction, and technology. Routledge, London, pp 127–144
Harper RHR, Hughes JA Shapiro D (1991) Harmonious working and CSCW: computer technology and air traffic control. In: Bowers J, Benford SD (eds) Studies in computer supported cooperative work, Elsevier, London, pp 225–234
Heath C, Luff P (2000) Technology in action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Hollan J, Hutchins E, Kirsh D (2000) Distributed cognition: towards a new foundation for HCI research. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact 7(2):174–196
Hughes JA, Randall D, Shapiro D (1992) Faltering from ethnography to design. In: Turner J, Kraut R (eds) Computer Supported Cooperative Work CSCW’92. ACM Press, NY
Hutchins E (1995) Cognition in the wild. MIT Press, Cambridge
Latour B (1987) Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Open University Press, Berkshire
Luff P, Heath C (1999) Surveying the scene: the monitoring practices of staff in control rooms. In: Noyes JM, Bransby M (eds) People in control: an international conference on human interfaces in control rooms. Cockpits amd command centres
Marti P (2000) The choice of the unit of analysis for modelling real work settings. Cogn Technol Work 2:62–74
Martin D, Bowers J, Wastell D (1997) The interactional affordances of technology: an ethnography of human-computer interaction in an ambulance control centre. In: Thomas P, O’Conaill B (eds) People and computers XI: proceedings of HCI’97. Springer, Berlin
Perry M (2003) Distributed cognition. In: Carroll JM (ed) HCI models, theories, and frameworks: towards a multidisciplinary science. Morgan Kaufmann, Orlando
Reddy M, Dourish P, Pratt W (2001) Coordinating heterogneous work: information and representation in medical care. In: Prinz W, Jarke M, Rogers Y, Schmidt K, Vulf V (eds) ECSCW 2001: proceedings of the seventh European conference on computer supported cooperative work. Kluwer
Schmidt K, Bannon L (1992) Taking CSCW seriously: supporting articulation work. Computer Support Coop Work. J Collaborative Comput 1(1):7–40
Schmidt K, Simone C (1996) Coordination mechanisms: towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW systems design. Computer Support Coop Work. J Collaborative Comput 5(2/3):155–200
Star SL (1989) The structure of ill-defined solutions: boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In: Gasser L, Huhns M (eds) Distributed artificial intelligence, Vol 2, Pitman, London
Strauss A (1988) The articulation of project work: an organizational process. Sociol Q 29(1):163–178
Suchman L, (1996) Constituting shared workspaces. In: Engeström Y, Middleton D (eds) Cognition and communication at work. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Vygotsky LS (1986) Thought and language. MIT Press, Cambridge
Weick KE, Roberts KH (1993) Collective mind in organizations: heedful interrelating on flight decks. Adm Sci Q 38: 357–381
Wenger E (2000) Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Acknowledgements
The study reported here was carried out as part of the Fast Prototyping project, sponsored by ENAV (Ente Nazionale Assistenza al Volo) and carried out by a consortium lead by Prof. Gaspare Galati from the Engineering Department of the University of Rome “Tor Vergata”. We wish to thank Fast Prototyping and the School of Computing, Middlesex University, for supporting this work. We would also like to express our gratitude to Paul van Fenema and Gabriella Spinelli who made many insightful comments on an earlier version of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fields, B., Amaldi, P. & Tassi, A. Representing collaborative work: the airport as common information space. Cogn Tech Work 7, 119–133 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-005-0177-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-005-0177-3