Skip to main content
Log in

A multi-period capacitated school location problem with modular equipment and closest assignment considerations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In rapidly growing urban areas, it is deemed vital to expand (or contract) an existing network of public facilities to meet anticipated changes in the level of demand. We present a multi-period capacitated median model for school network facility location planning that minimizes transportation costs, while functional costs are subject to a budget constraint. The proposed Vintage Flexible Capacitated Location Problem (ViFCLP) has the flexibility to account for a minimum school-age closing requirement, while the maximum capacity of each school can be adjusted by the addition of modular units. Non-closest assignments are controlled by the introduction of a parameter penalizing excess travel. The applicability of the ViFCLP is illustrated on a large US school system (Charlotte-Mecklenburg, North Carolina) where high school demand is expected to grow faster with distance to the city center. Higher school capacities and greater penalty on travel impedance parameter reduce the number of non-closest assignments. The proposed model is beneficial to policy makers seeking to improve the provision and efficiency of public services over a multi-period planning horizon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. CMS provides public education in the fourth fastest growing metropolitan area in the United States (US Census 2010).

  2. http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2010/11/10/1825785/move-to-put-off-cms-vote-fails.html, last accessed: October 11, 2013.

  3. Since 2008, Bailey Road (j = 20) and Rocky River (j = 21) High Schools have been added to the network, while Garinger (j = 15) was threatened of closure and Waddell High School (j = 14) closed.

  4. c E jm can also be negative, that is, there is a benefit to closing a school. This would be the case if the building or the land can be put back into the market.

  5. Since a percentage of the local demand can easily be met with this new addition, the roles of Hopewell High School (j = 1) and North Meck High School (j = 2) fade: several of the students who were previously assigned to those schools are now bussed to Stumpton High School.

References

  • Albareda-Sambola M, Fernandez E, Hinojosa Y, Puerto J (2009) The multi-period incremental service facility location problem. Comput Oper Res 36(5):1356–1375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison JF (1988) Relocatable classrooms: an alternative to permanent construction. Sch Bus Aff 54(1):24–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Antunes A, Peeters D (2000) A dynamic optimization model for school network planning. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 34(2):101–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antunes A, Peeters D (2001) On solving complex multi-period location models using simulated annealing. Eur J Oper Res 130(1):190–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antunes A, Berman O, Bigotte J, Krass D (2009) A location model for urban hierarchy planning with population dynamics. Environ Plan A 41(4):996–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araya F, Dell R, Donoso P, Marianov V, Martinez F, Weintraub A (2012) Optimizing location and size of rural schools in Chile. Int Trans Oper Res 19(5):695–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balou R (1968) Dynamic warehouse location analysis. J Mark Res 5(3):271-276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigotte JF, Antunes AP (2007) Social infrastructure planning: a location model and solution methods. Comput-Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 22(8):570–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan B (2003) Moving to modular. Am Sch Board J 190(6):36–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Caro T, Shirabe T, Guignard M, Weintraub A (2004) School redistricting: embedding GIS tools with integer programming. J Oper Res Soc 55(8):836–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church R, Schoepfle OB (1993) The choice alternative to school assignment. Environ Plan B 20(4):447–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church R, Murray AT (1993) Modeling school utilization and consolidation. J Urban Plan Dev ASCE 119(1):23–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke S, Surkis J (1968) An operations research approach to racial desegregation of school systems. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 1(3):259–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daskin M (1995) Network and discrete location. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dost J (1968) Reassessment of the school location problem: a multifunctional role for the school in the urban environment. Ann Reg Sci 2(1):136–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner Z (1995a) Facility location. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Drezner Z (1995b) Dynamic facility location: the progressive p-median problem. Locat Sci 3(1):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fong C, Srinivasan V (1981) The multi-region dynamic capacity expansion problem, Part II. Oper Res 29(4):801–816

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming JA (1997) The saga of relocatable classroom. Sch Adm 54(6):18–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerrard R, Church R (1996) Closest assignment constraints and location models: properties and structure. Locat Sci 4(4):251–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenleaf N, Harrison T (1987) A mathematical programming approach to elementary school facility decisions. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 21(6):395–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen S (1990) Multiperiod capacitated location models. In: Mirchandani P, Francis R (eds) Discrete location theory. Wiley, New York, pp 173–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris D (2006) Class size and school size: taking the trade-offs seriously. Brookings Pap Educ Policy 1:137–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons JB (2001) Do school facilities really impact a child's education? Counc Educ Facil Plan Int (CEFPI) Brief Issue 1:6

    Google Scholar 

  • Manne AS (1967) Investments for capacity expansion, size, location, and time-phasing. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxfield D (1972) Spatial planning of school districts. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 62(4):582-590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirchandani PB, Francis RL (1990) Discrete location theory. New York, Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller S (2008) Dynamic school network planning in urban areas: A multi-period, cost-minimizing location planning approach with respect to flexible substitution patterns of facilities. LIT Verlag Munster, Münster

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray AT, Gerrard R (1997) Capacitated service and regional constraints in location-allocation modeling. Locat Sci 5(2):103–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics (2011) Digest of education statistics: 2010, Chapter 2, Washington, DC

  • ReVelle C, Laporte G (1996) The plant location problem: new models and research prospects. Oper Res 44(6):864–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ReVelle C, Murray AT, Serra D (2007) Location models for ceding market share and shrinking services. Omega 35(5):533–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Roodman GM, Schwartz LB (1975) Optimal and heuristic phase-out strategies. AIIE Trans 7(2):177–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor R, Vasu M, Causby J (1999) Integrated planning for school and community: the case of Johnston County, North Carolina. Interfaces 29:67–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira J, Antunes A, Peeters D (2007) An optimization-based study on the redeployment of a secondary school network. Environ Plan B 34(2):296–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira J, Antunes A (2008) A hierarchical location model for public facility planning. Eur J Oper Res 185(1):92–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thill J-C, Delmelle EC, Son JS, Venkitasubramanian K, Zhou Y, Gong Z, Ali A (2011) Charlotte land use and economic simulator. Presented at the annual North American meetings of the regional science association international, Miami, FL

  • U.S. Department of Education (1999) A back to school report on the baby boom echo: no end in sight. Washington, DC

  • Van Roy T, Erlenkotter D (1982) A dual-based procedure for dynamic facility location. Manag Sci 28(10):1091–1105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viegas J (1987) Short and mid-term planning of an elementary school network in a suburb of Lisbon. Sistemi Urbani 1:57–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Batta R, Bhadury J, Rump CM (2003) Budget constrained location problem with opening and closing of facilities. Comput Oper Res 30(13):2047–2069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wesolowsky G (1973) Dynamic facility location. Manag Sci 19(11):1241–1247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witten K, McCreanor T, Kearns R, Ramasubramanian L (2001) The impacts of a school closure on neighborhood social cohesion: narratives from InverCargill, New Zealand. Health Place 7(4):307–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye X, Konduri K, Pendyala R, Sana B, Waddell P (2009) A methodology to match distributions of both housefold and person attributes in the generation of synthetic populations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Center for Operations Research and Econometrics, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, which made it possible for the first author to reside at CORE during the Summer 2011. In addition, we appreciate the feedback we received from Scott McCully who is the Executive Director of Planning and Student Placement for Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, as well as three anonymous referees, who helped us improve a first version of our paper. The first and second author acknowledge support from the Renaissance Computing Institute of North Carolina.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric M. Delmelle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Delmelle, E.M., Thill, JC., Peeters, D. et al. A multi-period capacitated school location problem with modular equipment and closest assignment considerations. J Geogr Syst 16, 263–286 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-013-0195-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-013-0195-2

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation