Skip to main content
Log in

Seven-year corneal densitometry changes after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the 7-year changes in corneal densitometry (CD) after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK). Forty-two eyes undergoing SMILE and thirty-one undergoing FS-LASIK were included in this retrospective study. CD was measured preoperatively and at 3 and 7 years postoperatively. Three concentric radial zones (0–2, 2–6, and 6–10 mm) of three different corneal depths (anterior 120 μm, posterior 60 μm, and central layer) were analyzed. In all three zones of the three corneal layers, no significant difference in CD was found between the two groups preoperatively and at 3 and 7 years postoperatively (all P > 0.05). All CD values in the three zones of the anterior and central layers significantly declined at 3 years postoperatively (all P < 0.001), and then increased at 7 years postoperatively compared to corresponding 3-year values (all P < 0.01). In the posterior layer, CD values in the 0–2-mm and 2–6-mm zones decreased at 3 years postoperatively (all P < 0.01) and continued to decrease at 7 years postoperatively (all P < 0.01). Similar CD trends were observed after SMILE and FS-LASIK. Posterior layer CD showed a decrease throughout the study period. In the anterior and central layers, CD values decreased and then increased at 7 years postoperatively. The transparency changes might have been due to age-related three-dimensional growth of collagen fibers and wound-healing reactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Otri AM, Fares U, Al-Aqaba MA et al (2012) Corneal densitometry as an indicator of corneal health. Ophthalmology 119:501–508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McLaren JW, Wacker K, Kane KM et al (2016) Measuring corneal haze by using Scheimpflug photography and confocal microscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 57:227–235

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Montorio D, Cennamo G, Menna F et al (2020) Evaluation of corneal structures in myopic eyes more than twenty-two years after photorefractive keratectomy. J Biophotonics 13:e202000138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shajari M, Wanner E, Rusev V et al (2018) Corneal densitometry after femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (Fs-LASIK) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Curr Eye Res 43:605–610

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Poyales F, Garzon N, Mendicute J et al (2017) Corneal densitometry after photorefractive keratectomy, laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis, and small-incision lenticule extraction. Eye 31:1647–1654

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lazaridis A, Droutsas K, Sekundo W et al (2017) Corneal clarity and visual outcomes after small-incision lenticule extraction and comparison to femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis. J Ophthalmol 2017:5646390

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Pedersen IB, Ivarsen A, Hjortdal J (2017) Changes in astigmatism, densitometry, and aberrations after SMILE for low to high myopic astigmatism: a 12-month prospective study. J Refract Surg 33:11–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Boulze-Pankert M, Dariel R, Hoffart L (2016) Corneal Scheimpflug densitometry following photorefractive keratectomy in myopic eyes. J Refract Surg 32:788–791

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hashemi H, Pakbin M, Pakravan M et al (2022) Effect of short versus long-term steroid on corneal haze after photorefractive keratectomy: a randomized, double-masked clinical trial. Am J Ophthalmol 235:211–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Han T, Zhao J, Shen Y et al (2017) A three-year observation of corneal backscatter after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). J Refract Surg 33:377–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wei R, Li M, Yang W et al (2020) Corneal densitometry after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK (FS-LASIK): 5-year prospective comparative study. Front Med 7:521078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dawson DG, Edelhauser HF, Grossniklaus HE (2005) Long-term histopathologic findings in human corneal wounds after refractive surgical procedures. Am J Ophthalmol 139:168–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Canadas P, de Benito-Llopis L, Hernandez-Verdejo JL et al (2013) Comparison of keratocyte density after femtosecond laser vs mechanical microkeratome from 3 months up to 5 years after LASIK. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 251:2171–2179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McLaren JW, Bourne WM, Maguire LJ et al (2015) Changes in keratocyte density and visual function five years after laser in situ keratomileusis: femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome. Am J Ophthalmol 160:163–170

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Pakbin M, Khabazkhoob M, Pakravan M et al (2020) Corneal Scheimpflug densitometry in photorefractive keratectomy candidates. Cornea 39:1381–1388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cankaya AB, Tekin K, Kiziltoprak H et al (2018) Assessment of corneal backward light scattering in the healthy cornea and factors affecting corneal transparency. Jpn J Ophthalmol 62:335–341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Karmiris E, Soulantzou K, Machairoudia G et al (2022) Corneal densitometry assessed with Scheimpflug camera in healthy corneas and correlation with specular microscopy values and age. Cornea 41:60–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Garzon N, Poyales F, Illarramendi I et al (2017) Corneal densitometry and its correlation with age, pachymetry, corneal curvature, and refraction. Int Ophthalmol 37:1263–1268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ni Dhubhghaill S, Rozema JJ, Jongenelen S et al (2014) Normative values for corneal densitometry analysis by Scheimpflug optical assessment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55:162–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Daxer A, Misof K, Grabner B et al (1998) Collagen fibrils in the human corneal stroma: structure and aging. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39:644–648

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Klingler KN, McLaren JW, Bourne WM et al (2012) Corneal endothelial cell changes 5 years after laser in situ keratomileusis: femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:2125–2130

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kamiya K, Igarashi A, Ishii R et al (2012) Early clinical outcomes, including efficacy and endothelial cell loss, of refractive lenticule extraction using a 500 kHz femtosecond laser to correct myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:1996–2002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jimenez-Garcia M, Ni Dhubhghaill S, Hershko S et al (2021) Densitometry marks delineating the affected area in keratoconus: clinical suitability of a new descriptive system based on its repeatability and reproducibility. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 41:748–756

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shen Y, Han T, Jhanji V et al (2019) Correlation between corneal topographic, densitometry, and biomechanical parameters in keratoconus eyes. Transl Vis Sci Technol 8:12

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Ozkan HH, Koc M, Kiziltoprak H et al (2021) Evaluation of topographic, tomographic, topometric, densitometric, and aberrometric features of cornea with pentacam HR system in subclinical keratoconus. Int Ophthalmol 41:1729–1741

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kenney MC, Nesburn AB, Burgeson RE et al (1997) Abnormalities of the extracellular matrix in keratoconus corneas. Cornea 16:345–351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Randleman JB, Woodward M, Lynn MJ et al (2008) Risk assessment for ectasia after corneal refractive surgery. Ophthalmology 115:37–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gavrilov JC, Atia R, Borderie V et al (2018) Unilateral corneal ectasia after small-incision lenticule extraction in a 43-year-old patient. J Cataract Refract Surg 44:403–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Elsheikh A, Wang D, Brown M et al (2007) Assessment of corneal biomechanical properties and their variation with age. Curr Eye Res 32:11–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China for Young Scholars (Grant No. 82000929), the Shanghai Sailing Program (Grant No. 20YF1405000), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81770955), Project of Shanghai Science and Technology (Grant No.20410710100), Clinical Research Plan of SHDC (SHDC2020CR1043B), Project of Shanghai Xuhui District Science and Technology (2020-015), Project of Shanghai Xuhui District Science and Technology(XHLHGG202104), Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Laser and Autostereoscopic 3D for Vision Care (20DZ2255000), Construction of a 3D digital intelligent prevention and control platform for the whole life cycle of highly myopic patients in the Yangtze River Delta (21002411600).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TH, XTZ, and YX were involved in the conception and design of the study. Material preparation and data collection were performed by TH, YYH, and YS. Data analysis was performed by LLZ. The first draft of the manuscript was written by TH and LLZ. Critical revision of the manuscript was performed by XTZ and YX. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xingtao Zhou or Ye Xu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, T., Zhang, L., Huang, Y. et al. Seven-year corneal densitometry changes after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis. Lasers Med Sci 38, 183 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-023-03850-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-023-03850-x

Keywords

Navigation