Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The efficacy of CO2 laser in the treatment of genitourinary syndrome of menopause: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

CO2 laser has been proposed as a treatment strategy for genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM). In order to assess its efficacy for treating GSM, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. To identify the current state of randomized controlled trials on CO2 laser therapy for GSM, a literature review was conducted. We systematically searched the following databases: PUBMED, EMBASE and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. In addition, a review of the references in the retrieved studies was carried out. Of 562 identified studies, 9 were eligible and were included in our analysis, involving 523 patients in total. Based on our analysis, CO2 laser has no statistical difference compared with estrogen in VHI (p = 0.87), FSFI total score (p = 0.19), FSFI-Arousal (p = 0.11), FSFI-Desire (p = 0.72), FSFI-Orgasm (p = 0.45) and FSFI-Satisfaction (p = 0.08). The meta-analysis also showed that CO2 laser significantly improved FSFI-Lubrication scores compared with estrogen therapy (p = 0.0004). Furthermore, compared with the sham group, CO2 laser group had statistically improved VHI scores (p = 0.003) and FSFI scores (p < 0.00001). CO2 laser therapy may be an effective alternative to estrogen therapy for GSM both in cases where estrogen is not applicable because of comorbidities and in cases in which women do not desire to take estrogen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Portman DJ, Gass MLS, Vulvovaginal Atrophy Terminology Consensus Conference Panel (2014) Genitourinary syndrome of menopause: new terminology for vulvovaginal atrophy from the International Society for the Study of Women’s Sexual Health and the North American Menopause Society. Menopause N Y N 21:1063–1068. https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000000329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Santoro N, Komi J (2009) Prevalence and impact of vaginal symptoms among postmenopausal women. J Sex Med 6:2133–2142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01335.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pastore LM, Carter RA, Hulka BS, Wells E (2004) Self-reported urogenital symptoms in postmenopausal women: Women’s Health Initiative. Maturitas 49:292–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2004.06.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barnabei VM, Cochrane BB, Aragaki AK et al (2005) Menopausal symptoms and treatment-related effects of estrogen and progestin in the Women’s Health Initiative. Obstet Gynecol 105:1063–1073. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000158120.47542.18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Winneker RC, Harris HA (2011) Progress and prospects in treating postmenopausal vaginal atrophy. Clin Pharmacol Ther 89:129–132. https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.2010.161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Management of symptomatic vulvovaginal atrophy (2013) position statement of The North American Menopause Society. Menopause N Y N 20:888–902. https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0b013e3182a122c2. (quiz 903–904)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ettinger B, Hait H, Reape KZ, Shu H (2008) Measuring symptom relief in studies of vaginal and vulvar atrophy: the most bothersome symptom approach. Menopause N Y N 15:885–889. https://doi.org/10.1097/gme.0b013e318182f84b

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gandhi J, Chen A, Dagur G et al (2016) Genitourinary syndrome of menopause: an overview of clinical manifestations, pathophysiology, etiology, evaluation, and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 215:704–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shulman LP, Portman DJ, Lee WC et al (2002) (2008) A retrospective managed care claims data analysis of medication adherence to vaginal estrogen therapy: implications for clinical practice. J Womens Health 17:569–578. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2007.0407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Suckling J, Lethaby A, Kennedy R (2006) Local oestrogen for vaginal atrophy in postmenopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18:CD001500. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001500.pub2

  11. Calleja-Agius J, Brincat MP (2009) Urogenital atrophy. Climacteric 12:279–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/13697130902814751

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nappi RE, Biglia N, Cagnacci A et al (2016) Diagnosis and management of symptoms associated with vulvovaginal atrophy: expert opinion on behalf of the Italian VVA study group. Gynecol Endocrinol Off J Int Soc Gynecol Endocrinol 32:602–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2016.1183627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gaspar A, Addamo G, Brandi H (2011) Vaginal fractional CO2 laser: a minimally invasive option for vaginal rejuvenation. Am J Cosmet Surg 28:156–162

  14. Tadir Y, Gaspar A, Lev-Sagie A et al (2017) Light and energy based therapeutics for genitourinary syndrome of menopause: Consensus and controversies. Lasers Surg Med 49:137–159. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22637

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Weinberger JM, Houman J, Caron AT, Anger J (2019) Female Sexual Dysfunction: A Systematic Review of Outcomes Across Various Treatment Modalities. Sex Med Rev 7:223–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sxmr.2017.12.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Aguiar LB, Politano CA, Costa-Paiva L, Juliato CRT (2020) Efficacy of Fractional CO2 Laser, Promestriene, and Vaginal Lubricant in the Treatment of Urinary Symptoms in Postmenopausal Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Lasers Surg Med 52:713–720. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.23220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Conté C, Jauffret T, Vieillefosse S et al (2017) Laser procedure for female urinary stress incontinence: A review of the literature. Progres En Urol J Assoc Francaise Urol Soc Francaise Urol 27:1076–1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2017.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. González Isaza P, Jaguszewska K, Cardona JL, Lukaszuk M (2018) Long-term effect of thermoablative fractional CO 2 laser treatment as a novel approach to urinary incontinence management in women with genitourinary syndrome of menopause. Int Urogynecol J 29:211–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3352-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shobeiri SA, Kerkhof MH, Minassian VA et al (2019) IUGA committee opinion: laser-based vaginal devices for treatment of stress urinary incontinence, genitourinary syndrome of menopause, and vaginal laxity. Int Urogynecol J 30:371–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3830-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vader J-P (1998) Randomised Controlled Trials: A User’s Guide. BMJ 317:1258–1258. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327:557–560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Paraiso MFR, Ferrando CA, Sokol ER et al (2020) A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal laser therapy to vaginal estrogen therapy in women with genitourinary syndrome of menopause: The VeLVET Trial. Menopause 27:50–56. https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000001416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Politano CA, Costa-Paiva L, Aguiar LB et al (2019) Fractional CO2 laser versus promestriene and lubricant in genitourinary syndrome of menopause: a randomized clinical trial. Menopause 26:833–840. https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000001333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cruz VL, Steiner ML, Pompei LM et al (2018) Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial for evaluating the efficacy of fractional CO2 laser compared with topical estriol in the treatment of vaginal atrophy in postmenopausal women. Menopause 25:21–28. https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000000955

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Eftekhar T, Forooghifar T, Khalili T et al (2020) The Effect of the CO 2 Fractional Laser or Premarin Vaginal Cream on Improving Sexual Function in Menopausal Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Lasers Med Sci 11:292–298. https://doi.org/10.34172/jlms.2020.49

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Salvatore S, Pitsouni E, Grigoriadis T et al (2021) CO2 laser and the genitourinary syndrome of menopause: a randomized sham-controlled trial. Climacteric J Int Menopause Soc 24:187–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/13697137.2020.1829584

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Li FG, Maheux-Lacroix S, Deans R et al (2021) Effect of Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser vs Sham Treatment on Symptom Severity in Women With Postmenopausal Vaginal Symptoms: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 326:1381–1389. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.14892

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Page A-S, Verbakel JY, Verhaeghe J et al (2023) Laser versus sham for genitourinary syndrome of menopause: A randomised controlled trial. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 130:312–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17335

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Quick AM, Dockter T, Le-Rademacher J et al (2021) Pilot study of fractional CO2 laser therapy for genitourinary syndrome of menopause in gynecologic cancer survivors. Maturitas 144:37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.10.018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ruanphoo P, Bunyavejchevin S (2020) Treatment for vaginal atrophy using microablative fractional CO2 laser: a randomized double-blinded sham-controlled trial. Menopause 27:858–863. https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000001542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. The NAMS (2020) GSM Position Statement Editorial Panel (2020) The 2020 genitourinary syndrome of menopause position statement of The North American Menopause Society. Menopause N Y N 27:976–992. https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000001609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Salvatore S, Nappi RE, Zerbinati N et al (2014) A 12-week treatment with fractional CO2 laser for vulvovaginal atrophy: a pilot study. Climacteric J Int Menopause Soc 17:363–369. https://doi.org/10.3109/13697137.2014.899347

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Gotkin RH, Sarnoff DS, Cannarozzo G et al (2009) Ablative skin resurfacing with a novel microablative CO2 laser. J Drugs Dermatol JDD 8:138–144

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rahn DD, Carberry C, Sanses TV et al (2014) Vaginal estrogen for genitourinary syndrome of menopause: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 124:1147–1156. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000526

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Goldstein I (2010) Recognizing and Treating Urogenital Atrophy in Postmenopausal Women. J Womens Health 19:425–432. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2009.1384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Willhite LA, O’Connell MB (2001) Urogenital Atrophy: Prevention and Treatment. Pharmacother Off J Am Coll Clin Pharm 21:464–480. https://doi.org/10.1592/phco.21.5.464.34486

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Lubián López DM (2022) Management of genitourinary syndrome of menopause in breast cancer survivors: An update. World J Clin Oncol 13:71–100. https://doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v13.i2.71

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Lapii GA, Yakovleva AY, Neimark AI (2017) Structural Reorganization of the Vaginal Mucosa in Stress Urinary Incontinence under Conditions of Er:YAG Laser Treatment. Bull Exp Biol Med 162:510–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-017-3650-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Athanasiou S, Pitsouni E, Falagas ME et al (2017) CO2-laser for the genitourinary syndrome of menopause. How many laser sessions? Maturitas 104:24–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.07.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sokol ER, Karram MM (2017) Use of a novel fractional CO2 laser for the treatment of genitourinary syndrome of menopause: 1-year outcomes. Menopause N Y N 24:810–814. https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000000839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Salvatore S, Maggiore ULR, Origoni M et al (2014) Microablative Fractional CO 2 Laser Improves Dyspareunia Related to Vulvovaginal Atrophy: A Pilot Study. J Endometr Pelvic Pain Disord 6:150–156. https://doi.org/10.5301/je.5000184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Blaganje M, Šćepanović D, Žgur L et al (2018) Non-ablative Er:YAG laser therapy effect on stress urinary incontinence related to quality of life and sexual function: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 224:153–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.03.038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Gordon C, Gonzales S, Krychman ML (2019) Rethinking the techno vagina: a case series of patient complications following vaginal laser treatment for atrophy. Menopause N Y N 26:423–427. https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000001293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ahluwalia J, Avram MM, Ortiz AE (2019) Lasers and energy-based devices marketed for vaginal rejuvenation: A cross-sectional analysis of the MAUDE database. Lasers Surg Med 51:671–677. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.23084

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Samuels JB, Garcia MA (2019) Treatment to External Labia and Vaginal Canal With CO2 Laser for Symptoms of Vulvovaginal Atrophy in Postmenopausal Women. Aesthet Surg J 39:83–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjy087

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Wallace SL, Sokol ER, Enemchukwu EA (2020) Vaginal energy-based devices: characterization of adverse events based on the last decade of MAUDE safety reports. Menopause N Y N 28:135–141. https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000001661

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81870525), Taishan Scholars Program of Shandong Province (No.tsqn201909199).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: Yuanshan Cui. Data curation: Qiancheng Mao, Tong Cai. Formal analysis: Qiancheng Mao, Tong Cai. Funding acquisition: Jitao Wu, Yuanshan Cui. Investigation: Qiancheng Mao, Tong Cai. Methodology: Qiancheng Mao, Tong Cai. Project administration: Yushan Cui. Resources: Qiancheng Mao, Tong Cai. Software: Qiancheng Mao, Tong Cai. Supervision: Yuanshan Cui, Jitao Wu. Writin10g – original draft: Qiancheng Mao, Tong Cai. Writing – review & editing: Yuanshan Cui.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yuanshan Cui or Jitao Wu.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

No ethics to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mao, Q., Cai, T., Li, H. et al. The efficacy of CO2 laser in the treatment of genitourinary syndrome of menopause: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Lasers Med Sci 38, 152 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-023-03808-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-023-03808-z

Keywords

Navigation