Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Blue light therapy to treat candida vaginitis with comparisons of three wavelengths: an in vitro study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anti-fungal blue light (ABL) therapies have been widely studied to treat various microbial infections in the literature. The blue light with wavelengths ranging from 400 to 470 nm has been reported to be effective to inhibit various kinds of bacteria and fungi. The existing studies usually report the viability rates of the pathogens under the irradiation of the blue light with different dosage parameters. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is still no work especially focusing on studying the effect of ABL therapies on treating candida vaginitis, where it is important to study the viability of both the Candida albicans (C. albicans) and the human vaginal epithelial cells. It is the purpose of this work to conduct ABL experiments on both of these two cells, analyze the effects, and determine the best ABL wavelength out of three candidates, i.e., 405-nm, 415-nm, and 450-nm wavelength. The viability rates of the C. albicans and the human vaginal epithelial cells irradiated by the three blue LED light sources were measured, whose irradiance (power density) were all set to 50 mW/cm2. The dynamic viability models of the C. albicans and the epithelial cells were built based on the experimental data. Moreover, in this work, we also built a functional relationship between the viability of these two types of cells, by which we further compared the effects of the blue light irradiation on both the C. albicans and vaginal epithelial cells. The experimental data showed that when an approximately 80% inhibiting rate of the C. albicans was achieved, the survival rates of the epithelial cells were 0.6700, 0.7748, and 0.6027, respectively for the treatment by the 405-nm, 415-nm, and 450-nm wavelength light. On the other hand, by simulating the functional relationship between the viability of the two types of cells, the survival rates of the epithelial cells became 0.5783, 0.6898, and 0.1918 respectively using the 405-nm, 415-nm and 450-nm wavelength light, when the C. albicans was completely inhibited. Therefore, both the experimental data and the model simulation results have demonstrated that the 415-nm light has a more effective anti-fungal result with less damage to the epithelial cells than the 405-nm and 450-nm light.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arendorf T, Walker D (1980) The prevalence and intra-oral distribution of Candida albicans in man. Arch Oral Biol 25(1):1–10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barolet D (2008) Light-emitting diodes (LEDs) in dermatology. Semin Cutan Med Surg 27:227–238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Berg AO, Heidrich FE, Fihn SD, Bergman JJ, Wood RW, Stamm WE, Holmes KK (1984) Establishing the cause of genitourinary symptoms in women in a family practice: comparison of clinical examination and comprehensive microbiology. Jama 251(5):620–625

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Born M, Wolf E (2013) Principles of optics: electromagnetic theory of propagation, interference and diffraction of light. Elsevier, Amsterdam

  5. Buchanan R, Golden M, Whiting R (1993) Differentiation of the effects of pH and lactic or acetic acid concentration on the kinetics of Listeria monocytogenes inactivation. J Food Prot 56(6):474–478

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Calderone RA, Fonzi WA (2001) Virulence factors of Candida albicans. Trends Microbiol 9(7):327–335

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chick H (1908) An investigation of the laws of disinfection. Epidemiol Infect 8(1):92–158

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dai T, Gupta A, Huang YY, Yin R, Murray CK, Vrahas MS, Sherwood ME, Tegos GP, Hamblin MR (2013) Blue light rescues mice from potentially fatal Pseudomonas aeruginosa burn infection: efficacy, safety, and mechanism of action. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57(3):1238–1245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Dai T, Vrahas MS, Murray CK, Hamblin MR (2012) Ultraviolet C irradiation: an alternative antimicrobial approach to localized infections?. Expert Rev Anti-Infect Ther 10(2):185–195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Dong J, Xiong D (2017) Applications of light emitting diodes in health care. Ann Biomed Eng 45 (11):2509–2523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Douglas LJ (2003) Candida biofilms and their role in infection. Trends Microbiol 11(1):30–36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Erdogan A, Rao SSC (2015) Small intestinal fungal overgrowth. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 17(4):16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Figueira I, Sousa AC, Machado A, Habib F, Soares L, Pinheiro A (2019) Clinical study on the efficacy of LED phototherapy for pain control in an orthodontic procedure. Lasers Med Sci 34(3):479–485

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Guffey JS, Wilborn J (2006) In vitro bactericidal effects of 405-nm and 470-nm blue light. Photomed Laser Surg 24(6):684–688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hamblin MR, Viveiros J, Yang C, Ahmadi A, Ganz RA, Tolkoff MJ (2005) Helicobacter pylori accumulates photoactive porphyrins and is killed by visible light. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49(7):2822–2827

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Kanafani ZA, Perfect JR (2008) Resistance to antifungal agents: mechanisms and clinical impact. Clin Infect Dis 46(1):120–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim S, Kim J, Lim W, Jeon S, Kim O, Koh JT, Kim CS, Choi H, Kim O (2013) In vitro bactericidal effects of 625, 525, and 425 nm wavelength (red, green, and blue) light-emitting diode irradiation. Photomed Laser Surg 31(11):554–562

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kumar A, Ghate V, Kim MJ, Zhou W, Khoo GH, Yuk HG (2015) Kinetics of bacterial inactivation by 405 nm and 520 nm light emitting diodes and the role of endogenous coproporphyrin on bacterial susceptibility. J Photochem Photobiol B 149:37–44

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Maclean M, MacGregor SJ, Anderson JG, Woolsey G (2009) Inactivation of bacterial pathogens following exposure to light from a 405-nanometer light-emitting diode array. Appl Environ Microbiol 75(7):1932–1937

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Maisch T (2009) A new strategy to destroy antibiotic resistant microorganisms: antimicrobial photodynamic treatment. Mini-Rev Med Chem 9(8):974–983

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Morris C, Morris DF (1967) Normal’vaginal microbiology of women of childbearing age in relation to the use of oral contraceptives and vaginal tampons. J Clin Pathol 20(4):636

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Odds FC, et al. (1988) Candida and candidosis: a review and bibliography. Bailliere Tindall

  23. O’donovan P, Perrett CM, Zhang X, Montaner B, Xu YZ, Harwood CA, McGregor JM, Walker SL, Hanaoka F, Karran P (2005) Azathioprine and UVA light generate mutagenic oxidative DNA damage. Science 309(5742):1871–1874

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Pfaller MA (2012) Antifungal drug resistance: mechanisms, epidemiology, and consequences for treatment. Am J Med 125(1):S3–S13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Singh R, Chakrabarti A (2017) Invasive Candidiasis in the Southeast-Asian region. In: Candida albicans: Cellular and molecular biology. Springer, pp 25–40

  26. Sobel JD (1997) Vaginitis. N Engl J Med 337(26):1896–1903

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Taupp DE, Nimtz M, Berger RG, Zorn H (2008) Stress response of Nidula niveo-tomentosa to UV-A light. Mycologia 4(100):529–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Trzaska WJ, Wrigley HE, Thwaite JE, May RC (2017) Species-specific antifungal activity of blue light. Sci Rep 7(1):4605

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Tsutsumi-Arai C, Arai Y, Terada-Ito C, Takebe Y, Ide S, Umeki H, Tatehara S, Tokuyama-Toda R, Wakabayashi N, Satomura K (2019) Effectiveness of 405-nm blue LED light for degradation of Candida biofilms formed on PMMA denture base resin. Lasers Med Science 34:1457–1464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Vandeputte P, Ferrari S, Coste AT (2011) Antifungal resistance and new strategies to control fungal infections. Int J Microbiol 2012:1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vicente-Tejedor J, Marchena M, Ramírez L, García-ayuso D, Gómez-vicente V, Sánchez-ramos C, de la Villa, P, Germain F (2018) Removal of the blue component of light significantly decreases retinal damage after high intensity exposure, vol 13

  32. Xiong R, Xie G, Edmondson A, Sheard M (1999) A mathematical model for bacterial inactivation. Int J Food Microbiol 46(1):45–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang Y, Zhu Y, Chen J, Wang Y, Sherwood ME, Murray CK, Vrahas MS, Hooper DC, Hamblin MR, Dai T (2016) Antimicrobial blue light inactivation of Candida albicans: in vitro and in vivo studies. Virulence 7(5):536–545

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study is supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2017YFC0108500, Subproject No. 2017YFC0108502) and that of Suzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. Y757031705).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianfei Dong.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(DOCX 3.83 MB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, T., Dong, J., Yin, H. et al. Blue light therapy to treat candida vaginitis with comparisons of three wavelengths: an in vitro study. Lasers Med Sci 35, 1329–1339 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-019-02928-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-019-02928-9

Keywords

Navigation