Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of clinical efficacy and complications between Q-switched alexandrite laser and Q-switched Nd:YAG laser on nevus of Ota: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the application of Q-switched lasers on nevus of Ota (OTA) is well demonstrated, debates about clinical option between Q-switched alexandrite laser (QSA) and Q-switched Nd:YAG laser (QSNY) still remain. This systematic review and meta-analysis estimated the overall successful rate of OTA pigment clearance and complication rate of QSA and QSNY and evaluated which laser could produce a better result. English articles evaluating pigment clearance and complications of QSA and/or QSNY on OTA were screened through predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria and analyzed. The successful rate of pigment clearance and complication rate of QSA and QSNY were respectively calculated using a random-effects or fixed-effects model, depending on the heterogeneity of the included studies. The successful rate and complication rate of QSA and QSNY were compared statistically. Of the 140 articles searched, 13 met inclusion criteria. Totally, 2153 OTA patients treated by QSA and 316 patients treated by QSNY were analyzed. In QSA and QSNY groups, respectively, the successful rate of OTA pigment clearance was 48.3 % (95 % confidence interval (CI) 19.9–76.8 %) and 41 % (95 % CI 9.7–72.2 %), while the complication rate was 8.0 % (95 % CI 3.9–12.2 %) and 13.4 % (95 % CI 7.7–19.0 %). When compared with QSNY, QSA had a significantly higher successful rate (P = 0.017), and a lower complication rate (P = 0.000). According to this review, QSA may surpass QSNY in treatment for OTA as it had a superior successful rate of pigment clearance and a lower complication rate than QSNY did.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hata Y, Matsuka K, Ito O et al (1996) Treatment of nevus Ota: combined skin abrasion and carbon dioxide snow method. Plast Reconstr Surg 97:544–554

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hosaka Y, Onizuka T, Ichinose M et al (1995) Treatment of nevus Ota by liquid nitrogen cryotherapy. Plast Reconstr Surg 95:703–711

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Taylor CR, Flotte TJ, Gange RW, Anderson RR (1994) Treatment of nevus of Ota by Q-switched ruby laser. J Am Acad Dermatol 30:743–751

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson RR, Parrish JA (1983) Selective photothermolysis: precise microsurgery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation. Science 220:524–527

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Watanabe S, Takahashi H (1994) Treatment of nevus of Ota with the Q-switched ruby laser. N Engl J Med 331:1745–1750

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kono T, Nozaki M, Chan HH, Mikashima Y (2001) A retrospective study looking at the long-term complications of Q-switched ruby laser in the treatment of nevus of Ota. Lasers Surg Med 29:156–159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Seo HM, Choi CW, Kim WS (2015) Beneficial effects of early treatment of nevus of Ota with low-fluence 1,064-nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser. Dermatol Surg 41:142–148

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kar HK, Gupta L (2011) 1064 nm Q switched Nd: YAG laser treatment of nevus of Ota: an Indian open label prospective study of 50 patients. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 77:565–570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sethuraman G, Sharma VK, Sreenivas V (2013) Melanin index in assessing the treatment efficacy of 1064 nm Q switched Nd-Yag laser in nevus of Ota. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 6:189–193

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Chang CJ, Kou CS (2011) Comparing the effectiveness of Q-switched Ruby laser treatment with that of Q-switched Nd:YAG laser for oculodermal melanosis (Nevus of Ota). J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64:339–345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Aurangabadkar S (2008) QYAG5 Q-switched Nd:YAG laser treatment of nevus of Ota: an Indian study of 50 patients. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 1:80–84

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Chan HH, Leung RS, Ying SY et al (2000) A retrospective analysis of complications in the treatment of nevus of Ota with the Q-switched alexandrite and Q-switched Nd:YAG lasers. Dermatol Surg 26:1000–1006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Choi JE, Lee JB, Park KB et al (2014) A retrospective analysis of the clinical efficacies of Q-switched Alexandrite and Q-switched Nd:YAG lasers in the treatment of nevus of Ota in Korean patients. J Dermatol Treat 1–6

  14. Liu J, Ma YP, Ma XG et al (2011) A retrospective study of q-switched alexandrite laser in treating nevus of ota. Dermatol Surg 37:1480–1485

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Alster TS, Williams CM (1995) Treatment of nevus of Ota by the Q-switched alexandrite laser. Dermatol Surg 21:592–596

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lu Z, Fang L, Jiao S et al (2003) Treatment of 522 patients with nevus of Ota with Q-switched Alexandrite laser. Chin Med J (Engl) 116:226–230

    Google Scholar 

  17. Moreno-Arias GA, Camps-Fresneda A (2001) Treatment of nevus of Ota with the Q-switched alexandrite laser. Lasers Surg Med 28:451–455

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Suh DH, Hwang JH, Lee HS et al (2000) Clinical features of Ota's naevus in Koreans and its treatment with Q-switched alexandrite laser. Clin Exp Dermatol 25:269–273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang HW, Liu YH, Zhang GK et al (2007) Analysis of 602 Chinese cases of nevus of Ota and the treatment results treated by Q-switched alexandrite laser. Dermatol Surg 33:455–460

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Anderson RR, Margolis RJ, Watenabe S et al (1989) Selective photothermolysis of cutaneous pigmentation by Q-switched Nd: YAG laser pulses at 1064, 532, and 355 nm. J Invest Dermatol 93:28–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Anderson RR, Parrish JA (1981) The optics of human skin. J Invest Dermatol 77:13–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chan HH, King WW, Chan ES et al (1999) In vivo trial comparing patients' tolerance of Q-switched Alexandrite (QS Alex) and Q-switched neodymium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (QS Nd:YAG) lasers in the treatment of nevus of Ota. Lasers Surg Med 24:24–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Huang WH, Wang HW, Sun QN et al (2013) A new classification of nevus of Ota. Chin Med J (Engl) 126:3910–3914

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zuoliang Qi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Panxi Yu, Nanze Yu and Wenqi Diao contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, P., Yu, N., Diao, W. et al. Comparison of clinical efficacy and complications between Q-switched alexandrite laser and Q-switched Nd:YAG laser on nevus of Ota: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci 31, 581–591 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-016-1885-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-016-1885-z

Keywords

Navigation