Abstract
This study evaluated the shear bond strength (SBS) and adhesive remnant index (ARI) of ceramic brackets with different base designs using a 473-nm diode-pumped solid-state (DPSS) laser to test its usefulness as a light source. A total of 180 caries-free human premolars were divided into four groups according to the base designs: microcrystalline, crystalline particle (CP), dovetail, and mesh. For each base design, teeth were divided into three different subgroups for light curing using three different light-curing units (LCUs) (quartz–tungsten–halogen unit, light-emitting diode unit, and a DPSS laser of 473 nm). Applied light intensities for the DPSS laser and the other LCUs were approximately 630 and 900 mW/cm2, respectively. Stainless steel brackets with a mesh design served as controls. The failure modes of debonded brackets were scored using ARI. As a result, brackets bonded using the DPSS laser had the highest SBS values (16.5–27.3 MPa) among the LCUs regardless of base design. Regarding base designs, the CP groups showed the highest SBS values (22.9–27.3 MPa) regardless of LCU. Furthermore, stainless steel brackets with a mesh design had the lowest SBS values regardless of LCU. In many cases, brackets bonded using the DPSS laser had higher ARI scores and had more adhesive on their bases than on tooth surfaces. The study shows that the 473-nm DPSS laser has considerable potential for bonding ceramic brackets at lower light intensities than the other light-curing units examined.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Russell JS (2005) Aesthetic orthodontic brackets. J Orthod 32:146–163
Bishara SE, Fehr DE (1997) Ceramic brackets: something old, something new, a review. Semin Orthod 3:178–188
Kukiattrakoon B, Samruajbenjakul B (2010) Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets with various base designs bonded to aluminous and fluorapatite ceramics. Eur J Orthod 32:87–93
Matasa CG (1992) Direct bonding metallic brackets: where are they heading? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 101:552–560
Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M (2003) Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 89:268–274
Saraç YŞ, Külünk T, Elekdağ-Türk S, Saraç D, Türk T (2011) Effects of surface-conditioning methods on shear bond strength of brackets bonded to different all-ceramic materials. Eur J Orthod 33:667–672
Falkensammer F, Freudenthaler J, Pseiner B, Bantleon HP (2012) Influence of surface conditioning on ceramic microstructure and bracket adhesion. Eur J Orthod 34:498–504
Eslamian L, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Mousavi N, Ghasemi A (2012) A comparative study of shear bond strength between metal and ceramic brackets and artificially aged composite restorations using different surface treatments. Eur J Orthod 34:610–617
Buchalla W, Attin T (2007) External bleaching therapy with activation by heat, light or laser—a systematic review. Dent Mater 23:586–596
Oesterle LJ, Messersmith ML, Devine SM, Ness CF (1995) Light and setting times of visible-light-cured orthodontic adhesives. J Clin Orthod 29:31–36
Krämer N, Lohbauer U, García-Godoy F, Frankenberger R (2008) Light curing of resin-based composites in the LED era. Am J Dent 21:135–142
Tak O, Altintas SH, Ozturk N, Usumez (2009) Effect of three types of light-curing units on 5-year colour changes of light-cured composite. Clin Oral Investig 13:29–35
Mills RW, Jandt KD, Ashworth SH (1999) Dental composite depth of cure with halogen and blue light emitting diode (LED) technology. Br Dent J 186:388–391
Lalani N, Foley TF, Voth R, Banting D, Mamandras A (2000) Polymerization with the argon laser: curing time and shear bond strength. Angle Orthod 70:28–33
Hildebrand NK, Raboud DW, Heo G, Nelson AE, Major PW (2007) Argon laser vs conventional visible light-cured orthodontic bracket bonding: an in-vivo and in-vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 131:530–536
Klocke A, Korbmacher HM, Huck LG, Ghosh J, Kahl-Nieke B (2003) Plasma arc curing of ceramic brackets: an evaluation of shear bond strength and debonding characteristics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124:309–315
Oesterle LJ, Newman SM, Shellhart WC (2001) Rapid curing of bonding composite with a xenon plasma arc light. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 119:610–616
Pettemerides AP, Sherriff M, Ireland AJ (2004) An in vivo study to compare a plasma arc light and a conventional quartz halogen curing light in orthodontic bonding. Eur J Orthod 26:573–577
Telford W, Murga M, Hawley T, Hawley R, Packard B, Komoriya A, Haas F, Hubert C (2005) DPSS yellow–green 561-nm lasers for improved fluorochrome detection by flow cytometry. Cytometry A 68:36–44
Perfetto SP, Roederer M (2007) Increased immunofluorescence sensitivity using 532 nm laser excitation. Cytometry A 71:73–79
Kwon YH, Jang CM, Shin DH, Seol HJ, Kim HI (2008) The applicability of DPSS laser for light curing of composite resins. Lasers Med Sci 23:407–414
Kim YO, Park SB, Son WS, Ko CC, García-Godoy F, Kim HI, Kwon YH (2011) Diode-pumped solid-state laser for bonding orthodontic brackets: effect of light intensity and light-curing time. Lasers Med Sci 26:585–589
Bishara SE, Ostby AW, Ajlouni R, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ (2006) Early shear bond strength of a one-step self-adhesive on orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 76:689–693
Rueggeberg FA, Ergle JW, Mettenburg DJ (2000) Polymerization depths of contemporary light-curing units using microhardness. J Esthet Dent 12:340–349
Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL (1988) Marginal sealing of curing contraction gaps in class V composite resin restorations. J Dent Res 67:841–845
Lai JH, Johnson AE (1993) Measuring polymerization shrinkage of photo-activated restorative materials by a water-filled dilatometer. Dent Mater 9:139–143
Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ (1997) Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent 25:435–440
Soderquist SA, Drummond JL, Evans CA (2006) Bond strength evaluation of ceramic and stainless steel bracket bases subjected to cyclic tensile loading. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129:175.e7–175.e12
Uysal T, Ustdal A, Kurt G (2010) Evaluation of shear bond strength of metallic and ceramic brackets bonded to enamel prepared with self-etching primer. Eur J Orthod 32:214–218
Abu Alhaija ES, Abu AlReesh IA, AlWahadni AM (2010) Factors affecting the shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces. Eur J Orthod 32:274–280
Liu JK, Chung CH, Chang CY, Shieh DB (2005) Bond strength and debonding characteristics of a new ceramic bracket. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 128:761–765
Bishara SE, Olsen ME, Von Wald L (1997) Evaluation of debonding characteristics of a new collapsible ceramic bracket. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 112:552–559
Al Shamsi A, Cunningham JL, Lamey PJ, Lynch E (2006) Shear bond strength and residual adhesive after orthodontic bracket debonding. Angle Orthod 76:694–699
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by a research fund (2011) from the Catholic University of Pusan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Park, MG., Ro, JH., Park, JK. et al. Effect of a DPSS laser on the shear bond strength of ceramic brackets with different base designs. Lasers Med Sci 28, 1461–1466 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-012-1227-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-012-1227-8