Abstract
Originating from furniture scraps, packaging, urban tree pruning, and construction waste, urban wood waste generates surprisingly large annual volumes. Due to its abundance and interesting physical–chemical characteristics for its use, it can be an excellent alternative for generating renewable energy for heat and electricity. In this context, urban wood waste’s physical, chemical, and energetic properties were investigated, proposing alternative environmental routes for its introduction into the urban and industrial electricity sectors. Waste collected in Piracicaba (Brazil) was evaluated for physical and chemical composition, such as moisture, bulk density, particle size distribution, mineral contaminants, immediate chemical composition, chemical composition, and calorific value analysis. The waste studied presented potential characteristics for bioenergy generation, with ash and contaminant contents (such as metallic materials and sand) within the quality thresholds established by the energy sector. Among the waste materials analyzed, plywood, chipboard, wood, and OSB stood out for their high energy density (averaging 2.97 GJ/m3) and low ash content (averaging 1.13%). In contrast, MDF and hardboard exhibited lower calorific values and energy densities due to the wood cooking step in their manufacturing process, which could result in the loss of extractives and volatile materials. When categorizing the residues based on their characteristics, three distinct groups emerged, each associated with MDF, hardboard, or a combination of chipboard, OSB, wood, and plywood. This study’s findings support the creation of public policies aimed at valorizing and reusing urban wood waste, contributing to solid waste management in cities of different countries while sustainably generating energy.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Not applicable.
References
ABNT (2004) NBR 10.007: Amostragem de resíduos sólidos
Alao MA, Popoola OM, Ayodele TR (2022) Waste-to-energy nexus: an overview of technologies and implementation for sustainable development. Cleaner Energy Syst 3:100034. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CLES.2022.100034
de Alfaia RG, Costa AM, Campos JC (2017) Municipal solid waste in Brazil: a review. Waste Manag Res. 35:1195–1209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X17735375
ASTM (2021a) D1762–84: standard test method for chemical analysis of wood charcoal
ASTM (2017) D5057–17: standard test method for screening apparent specific gravity and bulk density of waste
ASTM (2021b) D1106–96: standard test method for acid-insoluble lignin in wood
Azeta O, Ayeni AO, Agboola O, Elehinafe FB (2021) A review on the sustainable energy generation from the pyrolysis of coconut biomass. Sci Afr 13:e00909. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCIAF.2021.E00909
Bianchini A, Pellegrini M, Rossi J, Saccani C (2018) Theoretical model and preliminary design of an innovative wet scrubber for the separation of fine particulate matter produced by biomass combustion in small size boilers. Biomass Bioenergy 116:60–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2018.05.011
Brandelet B, Pascual C, Debal M, Rogaume Y (2020) A cleaner biomass energy production by optimization of the operational range of a fabric filter. J Clean Prod 253:119906. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2019.119906
Brito JO, Ceribelli UL (2012) Determinação de contaminantes sólidos não combustíveis em biomassa
Carroll J, Finnan J (2017) Use of electrostatic precipitators in small-scale biomass furnaces to reduce particulate emissions from a range of feedstocks. Biosyst Eng 163:94–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOSYSTEMSENG.2017.08.021
Cesprini E, Resente G, Causin V et al (2020) Energy recovery of glued wood waste—A review. Fuel 262:116520. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUEL.2019.116520
Chaudhary P, Singh R, Shabin M et al (2022) Replacing the greater evil: can legalizing decentralized waste burning in improved devices reduce waste burning emissions for improved air quality? Environ Pollut 311:119897. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2022.119897
Chen H, Shan R, Zhao F et al (2023) A review on the NOx precursors release during biomass pyrolysis. Chem Eng J 451:138979. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEJ.2022.138979
Colling AV, Oliveira LB, Reis MM et al (2016) Brazilian recycling potential: energy consumption and green house gases reduction. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 59:544–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2015.12.233
Costa MAM, Schiavon NCB, Felizardo MP et al (2023) Emission analysis of sugarcane bagasse combustion in a burner pilot. Sustain Chem Pharm 32:101028. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCP.2023.101028
Ddiba D, Ekener E, Lindkvist M, Finnveden G (2022) Sustainability assessment of increased circularity of urban organic waste streams. Sustain Prod Consum 34:114–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SPC.2022.08.030
De Oliveira JL, Da Silva JN, Graciosa Pereira E et al (2013) Characterization and mapping of waste from coffee and eucalyptus production in Brazil for thermochemical conversion of energy via gasification. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 21:52–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2012.12.025
de Oliveira PRS, Trugilho PF, de Oliveira TJP (2022) Briquettes of acai seeds: characterization of the biomass and influence of the parameters of production temperature and pressure in the physical-mechanical and energy quality. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:8549–8558. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-021-15847-6/FIGURES/4
de Paula PT, Scatolino MV, de Araújo ACC et al (2019) Assessing proximate composition, extractive concentration, and lignin quality to determine appropriate parameters for selection of superior eucalyptus firewood. Bioenergy Res 12:626–641. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12155-019-10004-X/TABLES/11
De T, Protásio P, Bufalino L et al (2013) Brazilian lignocellulosic wastes for bioenergy production: characterization and comparison with fossil fuels. BioResources 8:1166–1185
Dias Júnior AF, Andrade CR, Lana AQ et al (2021) Tips on the variability of BBQ charcoal characteristics to assist consumers in product choice. Eur J Wood Wood Prod 79:1017–1026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-021-01659-5
Dias Junior AF, Esteves RP, da Silva ÁM et al (2020) Investigating the pyrolysis temperature to define the use of charcoal. Eur J Wood and Wood Prod 78:193–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00107-019-01489-6/FIGURES/10
DIN (2010) EN 14918: Determination of calorific value - Deutsches Institut Für Normung. CEN, Berlin
Lima MD, Patrício EP, Junior UD et al (2020) Logging wastes from sustainable forest management as alternative fuels for thermochemical conversion systems in Brazilian Amazon. Biomass Bioenergy 140:105660. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2020.105660
de Jesus E-JH, Guerra SP, Sansígolo CA, Ballarin AW (2018) Management of Eucalyptus short-rotation coppice and its outcome on fuel quality Renew. Energy 121(309):314. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2018.01.033
Everitt BS, Landau S, Leese M, Stahl D (2011) Cluster analysis In: 5th Edition Cluster Analysis 5th Edition Wiley series in probability and statistics Cluster Analysis 5th Edition
Falk B, McKeever D (2012) Generation and recovery of solid wood waste in the U.S. Biocycle 53(8):30
Fetene Y, Addis T, Beyene A, Kloos H (2018) Valorisation of solid waste as key opportunity for green city development in the growing urban areas of the developing world. J Environ Chem Eng 6:7144–7151. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JECE.2018.11.023
Florkowski WJ, Dzidula-Enyo Nouve Y, Bauske EM, Norton N (2022) Wood chip production and disposal choices: Landfill or recycle? J Clean Prod 357:131947. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2022.131947
Fraccascia L, Yazdanpanah V, van Capelleveen G, Yazan DM (2020) Energy-based industrial symbiosis: a literature review for circular energy transition. Environ Develop Sustain 23(4):4791–4825. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10668-020-00840-9
González-García S, Ferro FS, Lopes Silva DA et al (2019) Cross-country comparison on environmental impacts of particleboard production in Brazil and Spain. Resour Conserv Recycl 150:104434. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2019.104434
Haeldermans T, Claesen J, Maggen J et al (2019) Microwave assisted and conventional pyrolysis of MDF—Characterization of the produced biochars. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 138:218–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAAP.2018.12.027
Hastings A, Tallis MJ, Casella E et al (2014) The technical potential of Great Britain to produce ligno-cellulosic biomass for bioenergy in current and future climates. GCB Bioenergy 6:108–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/GCBB.12103
Heidari R, Yazdanparast R, Jabbarzadeh A (2019) Sustainable design of a municipal solid waste management system considering waste separators: a real-world application. Sustain Cities Soc 47:101457. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCS.2019.101457
Izquierdo-Horna L, Damazo M, Yanayaco D (2022) Identification of urban sectors prone to solid waste accumulation: a machine learning approach based on social indicators. Comput Environ Urban Syst 96:101834. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPENVURBSYS.2022.101834
Joshi O, Grebner DL, Khanal PN (2015) Status of urban wood-waste and their potential use for sustainable bioenergy in Mississippi. Resour Conserv Recycl 102:20–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2015.06.010
Karaj S, Rehl T, Leis H, Müller J (2010) Analysis of biomass residues potential for electrical energy generation in Albania. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14:493–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2009.07.026
Kaza S, Yao LC, Bhada-Tata P, Van Woerden F (2018) What a waste 2.0: A global snapshot of solid waste management to 2050. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1329-0
Kazimierski P, Hercel P, Januszewicz K, Kardaś D (2020) Pre-treatment of furniture waste for smokeless charcoal production. Materials 13:3188. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13143188
Khan ZA, Chowdhury SR, Mitra B et al (2023) Analysis of industrial symbiosis case studies and its potential in Saudi Arabia. J Clean Prod 385:135536. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2022.135536
Klingenberg D, Nolasco AM, Francisco A et al (2020) Energy potential of wood waste from a tropical urban forest. Res Soc Devel 9:e451997478–e451997478. https://doi.org/10.33448/RSD-V9I9.7478
Liu Y, Wu S, Zhang H, Xiao R (2021) Fast pyrolysis of holocellulose for the preparation of long-chain ether fuel precursors: effect of holocellulose types. Bioresour Technol 338:125519. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2021.125519
Mendoza Martinez CL, Alves Rocha EP, de Oliveira Carneira AC et al (2019) Characterization of residual biomasses from the coffee production chain and assessment the potential for energy purposes. Biomass Bioenergy 120:68–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2018.11.003
Míguez JL, Porteiro J, Behrendt F et al (2021) Review of the use of additives to mitigate operational problems associated with the combustion of biomass with high content in ash-forming species. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 141:110502. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2020.110502
MMA M do MA (2009) Aproveitamento de resíduos e subprodutos florestais, alternativas tecnológicas e propostas de políticas ao uso de resíduos florestais para fins energéticos. Curitiba
Nanda S, Berruti F (2021) A technical review of bioenergy and resource recovery from municipal solid waste. J Hazard Mater 403:123970. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2020.123970
Nowak DJ, Greenfield EJ, Ash RM (2019) Annual biomass loss and potential value of urban tree waste in the United States. Urban Urban Green 46:126469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126469
Odum H (1996) Environmental accounting: energy and environmental decision making
de Oliveira FR, França SLB, Rangel LAD (2018) Challenges and opportunities in a circular economy for a local productive arrangement of furniture in Brazil. Resour Conserv Recycl 135:202–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESCONREC.2017.10.031
Palander T (2011) Technical and economic analysis of electricity generation from forest, fossil, and wood-waste fuels in a Finnish heating plant. Energy 36:5579–5590. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2011.07.014
Pampuro N, Bagagiolo G, Cavallo E (2020) Energy requirements for wood chip compaction and transportation. Fuel 262:116618. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUEL.2019.116618
PMGIRS (2019) Indicadores PMGIRS - Piracicaba/SP - Ano base 2019. https://130d0c4c-ab3e-edc8-1080-4d80417aba96.filesusr.com/ugd/9804b1_e0363280be094ed8ac0a312e9b87e41e.pdf. Accessed 10 Nov 2023
Quinteiro P, Tarelho L, Marques P et al (2019) Life cycle assessment of wood pellets and wood split logs for residential heating. Sci Total Environ 689:580–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2019.06.420
Rohlf FJ (1970) Adaptive hierarchical clustering schemes. Syst Zool 19:58. https://doi.org/10.2307/2412027
Sette CR, Hansted ALS, Novaes E et al (2018) Energy enhancement of the eucalyptus bark by briquette production. Ind Crops Prod 122:209–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INDCROP.2018.05.057
TAPPI (2017) T 204 cm-97: Solvent extractives of wood and pulp
Wan G, Frazier CE (2019) Pine extractives strongly affect lignin thermochemical pathways. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 7:17999–18004. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSSUSCHEMENG.9B04833/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/SC9B04833_0006.JPEG
Wang N, Zhan H, Zhuang X et al (2020) Torrefaction of waste wood-based panels: More understanding from the combination of upgrading and denitrogenation properties. Fuel Process Technol 206:106462. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUPROC.2020.106462
Werther J, Saenger M, Hartge EU et al (2000) Combustion of agricultural residues. Prog Energy Combust Sci 26:1–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1285(99)00005-2
Wong CLY, Zawadzki W (2023) Emissions rate measurement with flow modelling to optimize landfill gas collection from horizontal collectors. Waste Manage 157:199–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WASMAN.2022.12.018
Yang W, Pudasainee D, Gupta R et al (2021) An overview of inorganic particulate matter emission from coal/biomass/MSW combustion: sampling and measurement, formation, distribution, inorganic composition and influencing factors. Fuel Process Technol 213:106657. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUPROC.2020.106657
Zheng A, Li L, Tippayawong N et al (2020) Reducing emission of NOx and SOx precursors while enhancing char production from pyrolysis of sewage sludge by torrefaction pretreatment. Energy 192:116620. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2019.116620
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES – Finance Code 001), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq - Chamada Universal 18/2021, Chamada de Bolsas no Exterior 26/2021, Bolsa de Produtividade em Desenvolvimento Tecnológico e Extensão Inovadora 08/2022 and Apoio a Projetos Internacionais de Pesquisa Científica, Tecnológica e de Inovação 14/2023) and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Espírito Santo (FAPES – Chamada Universal 03/2021, Chamada Universal 28/2022, Taxa de Pesquisa 02/2023 and Programa de Capacitação de Recursos Humanos na Pós-Graduação 12/2021).
Funding
The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
CRA, JOB and AFDJ contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by CRA, JOB and AFDJ. The first draft of the manuscript was written by CRA, GFMC, AMS and AFDJ, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. The final review of the manuscript was conducted by CRA, GFMC, AMS, JOB, WWCM, BMB, DS and AFDJ. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interests
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Andrade, C.R., Cupertino, G.F.M., da Silva, Á.M. et al. The potential of wood-based urban waste to generate bioenergy and increase the energetic sustainability. Clean Techn Environ Policy (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-024-02775-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-024-02775-5