Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of the Bruker Biotyper and VITEK MS MALDI-TOF MS systems for the identification of unusual and/or difficult-to-identify microorganisms isolated from clinical specimens

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the analytical performance characteristics of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) for the identification of unusual organisms. We evaluated the accuracy of two MALDI-TOF MS systems, bioMérieux VITEK MS (database v2.0) and Bruker Biotyper (software version 3.0), for the identification of the most difficult and/or unusual microorganisms isolated from clinical specimens. Our study included 174 bacterial isolates recovered from clinical cultures at Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO, from 2009 to 2013, representing 50 genera and 52 species. MS identifications were compared to the identification reported by the reference laboratory. Discrepancies were resolved using molecular methods, including 16S rRNA gene sequencing and additional molecular methods. When performed, molecular methods were considered the gold standard. Of the 168 isolates resolved to the genus level, VITEK MS identified 145 (86.3 %), and of the 114 isolates resolved to the species level, 97 (85.1 %) were correctly identified. Bruker Biotyper identified 155 (92.3 %) of 168 isolates to the genus level and 97 (85.1 %) of 114 isolates to the species level. VITEK MS and Bruker Biotyper provided no identification for 17 (10.1 %) and 12 (7.1 %) organisms, respectively, and misidentified six (3.6 %) and one (0.6 %) isolate, respectively. Six isolates (3.6 %) were not resolvable to the genus level and were excluded from data analysis due to the lack of a gold standard for comparison. There was no significant difference in the number of organisms identified to the genus level, species level, unidentified, or misidentified by the two MALDI-TOF MS systems (p = 0.11, 1.0, 0.44, and 0.12, respectively).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ford BA, Burnham CA (2013) Optimization of routine identification of clinically relevant Gram-negative bacteria by use of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry and the Bruker Biotyper. J Clin Microbiol 51(5):1412–1420. doi:10.1128/JCM.01803-12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. McElvania Tekippe E, Shuey S, Winkler DW, Butler MA, Burnham CA (2013) Optimizing identification of clinically relevant Gram-positive organisms by use of the Bruker Biotyper matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry system. J Clin Microbiol 51(5):1421–1427. doi:10.1128/JCM.02680-12

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bizzini A, Durussel C, Bille J, Greub G, Prod’hom G (2010) Performance of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry for identification of bacterial strains routinely isolated in a clinical microbiology laboratory. J Clin Microbiol 48(5):1549–1554. doi:10.1128/JCM.01794-09

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Eigner U, Holfelder M, Oberdorfer K, Betz-Wild U, Bertsch D, Fahr AM (2009) Performance of a matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry system for the identification of bacterial isolates in the clinical routine laboratory. Clin Lab 55(7–8):289–296

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Neville SA, Lecordier A, Ziochos H, Chater MJ, Gosbell IB, Maley MW, van Hal SJ (2011) Utility of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry following introduction for routine laboratory bacterial identification. J Clin Microbiol 49(8):2980–2984. doi:10.1128/JCM.00431-11

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. van Veen SQ, Claas EC, Kuijper EJ (2010) High-throughput identification of bacteria and yeast by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry in conventional medical microbiology laboratories. J Clin Microbiol 48(3):900–907. doi:10.1128/JCM.02071-09

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Risch M, Radjenovic D, Han JN, Wydler M, Nydegger U, Risch L (2010) Comparison of MALDI TOF with conventional identification of clinically relevant bacteria. Swiss Med Wkly 140:w13095. doi:10.4414/smw.2010.13095

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Seng P, Drancourt M, Gouriet F, La Scola B, Fournier PE, Rolain JM, Raoult D (2009) Ongoing revolution in bacteriology: routine identification of bacteria by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Clin Infect Dis 49(4):543–551. doi:10.1086/600885

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hsu YM, Burnham CA (2014) MALDI-TOF MS identification of anaerobic bacteria: assessment of pre-analytical variables and specimen preparation techniques. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 79(2):144–148. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.02.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cherkaoui A, Hibbs J, Emonet S, Tangomo M, Girard M, Francois P, Schrenzel J (2010) Comparison of two matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry methods with conventional phenotypic identification for routine identification of bacteria to the species level. J Clin Microbiol 48(4):1169–1175. doi:10.1128/JCM.01881-09

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Jamal WY, Shahin M, Rotimi VO (2013) Comparison of two matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry methods and API 20AN for identification of clinically relevant anaerobic bacteria. J Med Microbiol 62(Pt 4):540–544. doi:10.1099/jmm.0.053256-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen JH, Ho PL, Kwan GS, She KK, Siu GK, Cheng VC, Yuen KY, Yam WC (2013) Direct bacterial identification in positive blood cultures by use of two commercial matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry systems. J Clin Microbiol 51(6):1733–1739. doi:10.1128/JCM.03259-12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Mancini N, De Carolis E, Infurnari L, Vella A, Clementi N, Vaccaro L, Ruggeri A, Posteraro B, Burioni R, Clementi M, Sanguinetti M (2013) Comparative evaluation of the Bruker Biotyper and Vitek MS matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry systems for identification of yeasts of medical importance. J Clin Microbiol 51(7):2453–2457. doi:10.1128/JCM.00841-13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Fang H, Ohlsson AK, Ullberg M, Ozenci V (2012) Evaluation of species-specific PCR, Bruker MS, VITEK MS and the VITEK 2 system for the identification of clinical Enterococcus isolates. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 31(11):3073–3077. doi:10.1007/s10096-012-1667-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Marko DC, Saffert RT, Cunningham SA, Hyman J, Walsh J, Arbefeville S, Howard W, Pruessner J, Safwat N, Cockerill FR, Bossler AD, Patel R, Richter SS (2012) Evaluation of the Bruker Biotyper and Vitek MS matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry systems for identification of nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli isolated from cultures from cystic fibrosis patients. J Clin Microbiol 50(6):2034–2039. doi:10.1128/JCM.00330-12

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Martiny D, Busson L, Wybo I, El Haj RA, Dediste A, Vandenberg O (2012) Comparison of the Microflex LT and Vitek MS systems for routine identification of bacteria by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. J Clin Microbiol 50(4):1313–1325. doi:10.1128/JCM.05971-11

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Pence MA, McElvania Tekippe E, Wallace MA, Burnham CA (2014) Comparison and optimization of two MALDI-TOF MS platforms for the identification of medically relevant yeast species. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis (in press)

  18. Perez KK, Olsen RJ, Musick WL, Cernoch PL, Davis JR, Land GA, Peterson LE, Musser JM (2013) Integrating rapid pathogen identification and antimicrobial stewardship significantly decreases hospital costs. Arch Pathol Lab Med 137(9):1247–1254. doi:10.5858/arpa.2012-0651-OA

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Beekmann SE, Diekema DJ, Chapin KC, Doern GV (2003) Effects of rapid detection of bloodstream infections on length of hospitalization and hospital charges. J Clin Microbiol 41(7):3119–3125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Barenfanger J, Drake C, Kacich G (1999) Clinical and financial benefits of rapid bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. J Clin Microbiol 37(5):1415–1418

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Wolk DM, Dunne WM Jr (2011) New technologies in clinical microbiology. J Clin Microbiol 49(9 Suppl):S62–S67

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kang CI, Kim SH, Kim HB, Park SW, Choe YJ, Oh MD, Kim EC, Choe KW (2003) Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia: risk factors for mortality and influence of delayed receipt of effective antimicrobial therapy on clinical outcome. Clin Infect Dis 37(6):745–751. doi:10.1086/377200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Rebecca Jennemann and David Winkler, along with Barnes-Jewish Hospital and St. Louis Children’s Hospital clinical microbiology laboratories for their cooperation and support during the study.

Conflict of interest

This project was funded, in part, by an unrestricted award to EM, the bioMérieux Scholarship in Clinical Microbiology. CAB has received research support from bioMérieux.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pathology & Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8118, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA

    E. McElvania TeKippe & C.-A. D. Burnham

Authors
  1. E. McElvania TeKippe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C.-A. D. Burnham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C.-A. D. Burnham.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McElvania TeKippe, E., Burnham, CA.D. Evaluation of the Bruker Biotyper and VITEK MS MALDI-TOF MS systems for the identification of unusual and/or difficult-to-identify microorganisms isolated from clinical specimens. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 33, 2163–2171 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-014-2183-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-014-2183-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation