Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of the two blood culture systems, Bactec 9240 and BacT/Alert 3D, in the detection of Candida spp. and bacteria with polymicrobial sepsis

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the performance of the Bactec 9240 and BacT/Alert 3D blood culture systems in the detection of Candida spp. and bacteria in simulated polymicrobial sepsis models. A total of 28 clinical isolates of Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Candida albicans, and Candida glabrata were studied. Five polymicrobial models of C. albicans + S. aureus, C. albicans + E. coli, C. glabrata + S. aureus, C. glabrata + E. coli, and C. albicans + C. glabrata were prepared. Each combination was inoculated in five different blood culture vials. The two systems were compared for culture positivity and time to detection (TTD). Twenty-four mixed cultures with a yeast and a bacteria were tested. Bactec Mycosis vials could detect yeasts in all 24 cultures. The aerobic vials from both Bactec and BacT/Alert could detect both yeasts and bacteria in 22/24 (91.66 %) cultures. Bactec Plus Anaerobic/F and BacT/Alert FN vials could detect both microorganisms in 19/24 (79.16 %) and 4/24 (16.67 %) vials, respectively. Seven polymicrobial sepsis models with C. albicans + C. glabrata were also tested. Mycosis vials could detect both yeasts in 7/7 mixed cultures. The aerobic vials from Bactec and BacT/Alert could detect both yeasts in 3/7 and 2/7 mixed cultures, respectively. Bactec Plus Aerobic/F had a shorter TTD compared to BacT/Alert FA and Bactec Plus Anaerobic/F vials (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.01, respectively). The present study shows that the Bactec and BacT/Alert systems have different characteristics in the detection of yeasts and bacteria with polymicrobial sepsis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klotz SA, Chasin BS, Powell B, Gaur NK, Lipke PN (2007) Polymicrobial bloodstream infections involving Candida species: analysis of patients and review of the literature. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 59:401–406

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Arendrup MC, Sulim S, Holm A, Nielsen L, Nielsen SD, Knudsen JD, Drenck NE, Christensen JJ, Johansen HK (2011) Diagnostic issues, clinical characteristics, and outcomes for patients with fungemia. J Clin Microbiol 49:3300–3308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tortorano AM, Peman J, Bernhardt H, Klingspor L, Kibbler CC, Faure O, Biraghi E, Canton E, Zimmermann K, Seaton S, Grillot R; ECMM Working Group on Candidaemia (2004) Epidemiology of candidaemia in Europe: results of 28-month European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM) hospital-based surveillance study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 23:317–322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, Moss M (2003) The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med 348:1546–1554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McKenzie FE (2006) Case mortality in polymicrobial bloodstream infections. J Clin Epidemiol 59:760–761

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Morrell M, Fraser VJ, Kollef MH (2005) Delaying the empiric treatment of Candida bloodstream infection until positive blood culture results are obtained: a potential risk factor for hospital mortality. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49:3640–3645

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Garey KW, Rege M, Pai MP, Mingo DE, Suda KJ, Turpin RS, Bearden DT (2006) Time to initiation of fluconazole therapy impacts mortality in patients with candidemia: a multi-institutional study. Clin Infect Dis 43:25–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Taur Y, Cohen N, Dubnow S, Paskovaty A, Seo SK (2010) Effect of antifungal therapy timing on mortality in cancer patients with candidemia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:184–190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wilson ML, Mirrett S, Meredith FT, Weinstein MP, Scotto V, Reller LB (2001) Controlled clinical comparison of BACTEC plus anaerobic/F to standard anaerobic/F as the anaerobic companion bottle to plus aerobic/F medium for culturing blood from adults. J Clin Microbiol 39:983–989

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mirrett S, Reller LB, Petti CA, Woods CW, Vazirani B, Sivadas R, Weinstein MP (2003) Controlled clinical comparison of BacT/Alert standard aerobic medium with BACTEC standard aerobic medium for culturing blood. J Clin Microbiol 41:2391–2394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ericson EL, Klingspor L, Ullberg M, Özenci V (2012) Clinical comparison of the Bactec Mycosis IC/F, BacT/Alert FA, and BacT/Alert FN blood culture vials for the detection of candidemia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 73:153–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Meyer MH, Letscher-Bru V, Jaulhac B, Waller J, Candolfi E (2004) Comparison of Mycosis IC/F and Plus Aerobic/F media for diagnosis of fungemia by the Bactec 9240 system. J Clin Microbiol 42:773–777

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. George BJ, Horvath LL, Hospenthal DR (2005) Effect of inoculum size on detection of Candida growth by the BACTEC 9240 automated blood culture system using aerobic and anaerobic media. J Clin Microbiol 43:433–435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cateau E, Cognee AS, Tran TC, Vallade E, Garcia M, Belaz S, Kauffmann-Lacroix C, Rodier MH (2012) Impact of yeast-bacteria coinfection on the detection of Candida sp. in an automated blood culture system. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 72:328–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grants from the Karolinska Institutet.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Clinical Microbiology F 72, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, 141 86, Stockholm, Sweden

    L. Klingspor, S. A. Muhammed & V. Özenci

Authors
  1. L. Klingspor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. A. Muhammed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. V. Özenci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Özenci.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klingspor, L., Muhammed, S.A. & Özenci, V. Comparison of the two blood culture systems, Bactec 9240 and BacT/Alert 3D, in the detection of Candida spp. and bacteria with polymicrobial sepsis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 31, 2983–2987 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-012-1650-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-012-1650-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation