Abstract
Introduction
Stigma manifests both in prejudices and rejection from society towards patients who suffer from a specific pathology, and by patient’s internalization of this discrimination, with the consequent repercussions on their state of mind and quality of life. The aim of the study was to quantify the stigma associated with migraine and analyze whether it is related to the clinical-demographic characteristics of the patients, as well as the possible impact on their daily lives.
Materials and methods
The stigma scale for chronic illness (SSCI) and other questionnaires were administered to 56 patients with episodic migraine (EM), 18 with chronic migraine (CM), and 21 with epilepsy, as a control group.
Results
The mean SSCI score was higher (51.6 ± 15.0) in the CM group than in the EM (45.0 ± 13.5) and epilepsy (47.6 ± 15.5) groups, without reaching statistical significance. In addition, the score was higher in patients who were unemployed, divorced, and in those who had migraine with aura. A statistically significant correlation was found between the SSCI score and the impact of migraine on daily life, the presence of stress, anxiety and depression, and low self-esteem.
Conclusions
There is a stigma around migraine in our society, which seems to be more prevalent in patients with certain socio-demographic characteristics, and that is related to stress, mood alterations, and low self-esteem. Trying to reduce stigma could contribute to improve the control of migraine and reduce the impact of the disease at a socio-economic level.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Matías-Guiu J, Porta-Etessam J, Mateos V, Díaz-Insa S, Lopez-Gil A, Fernández C (2011) One-year prevalence of migraine in Spain: a nationwide population-based survey. Cephalalgia 31(4):463–470
Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (2018) The international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia 38(1):1–211
Lantéri-Minet M, Duru G, Mudge M, Cottrell S (2011) Quality of life impairment, disability and economic burden associated with chronic daily headache, focusing on chronic migraine with or without medication overuse: a systematic review. Cephalalgia 31(7):837–850
Link B, Phelan J (2006) Stigma and its public health implications. Lancet 367(9509):528–529
Rao D, Choi S, Victorson D, Bode R, Peterman A, Heinemann A, Cella D (2009) Measuring stigma across neurological conditions: the development of the stigma scale for chronic illness (SSCI). Qual Life Res 18(5):585–595
Haut S, Bigal M, Lipton R (2006) Chronic disorders with episodic manifestations: focus on epilepsy and migraine. Lancet Neurol 5(2):148–157
Aydemir N, Özkara Ç, Ünsal P, Canbeyli R (2011) A comparative study of health related quality of life, psychological well-being, impact of illness and stigma in epilepsy and migraine. Seizure 20(9):679–685
Young W, Park J, Tian I, Kempner J (2013) The stigma of migraine. PLoS One 8(1):e54074
Rendas-Baum R, Yang M, Varon S, Bloudek L, DeGryse R, Kosinski M (2014) Validation of the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) in patients with chronic migraine. Health Qual Life Outcomes 12(1):117–127
Viteri C, Codina M, Cobaleda S, Lahuerta J, Barriga J, Barrera S, Morales MD (2008) Validación de la versión española del cuestionario de calidad de vida en epilepsia QOLIE-10. Neurol 23(3):157–167
Zigmong AS, Snaith RP (1983) The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67(6):361–370
Nielsen M, Ørnbøl E, Vestergaard M, Bech P, Larsen F, Lasgaard M, Christensen K (2016) The construct validity of the perceived stress scale. J Psychosom Res 84:22–30
Rosenberg M (1965) Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Rami L, Valls-Pedret C, Bartrés-Faz D, Caprile C, Solé-Padullés C, Castellvi M, Olives J, Bosch B, Molinuevo JL (2011) Cuestionario de reserva cognitiva. Valores obtenidos en población anciana sana y con enfermedad de Alzheimer. Rev Neurol 52(04):195–201
Shapiro R, Lipton R, Reiner P (2014) EHMTI-0313. Factors influencing stigma towards persons with migraine. J Headache Pain 15(1):E36
González-Quintanilla V, Toriello-Suárez M, Gutiérrez-González S, Rojo-López A, González-Suárez A, Viadero-Cervera R, Palacio-Portilla E, Oterino-Durán A (2015) Estrés laboral en pacientes migrañosos: diferencias según la frecuencia de las crisis. Neurol 30(2):83–89
Berg J (2004) Economic evidence in migraine and other headaches: a review. Eur J Health Econ 5(1):s43–s54
Wachholtz A, Bhowmick A, Herbert LB, Marcus D (2017) More is not always better: an epidemiological assessment of migraine frequency and the impact on relationships. J Pain Manag Med 3(2):126
Lipton R, Bigal M, Kolodner K, Stewart W, Liberman J, Steiner T (2003) The family impact of migraine: population-based studies in the USA and UK. Cephalalgia 23(6):429–440
Hamelsky S, Lipton R (2006) Psychiatric comorbidity of migraine. Headache: J Head Face Pain 46(9):1327–1333
Lantéri-Minet M, Radat F, Chautard M, Lucas C (2005) Anxiety and depression associated with migraine: influence on migraine subjectsʼ disability and quality of life, and acute migraine management. Pain 118(3):319–326
Parikh S, Young W (2019) Migraine: stigma in society. Curr Pain Headache Rep 23(1):8
Young W (2018) The stigma of migraine. Pract Neurol 2:23–26
Giussani G, Enia G, Bianchi E, Mecarelli O, Beghi E, Pulitano P et al (2020) The management of epilepsy in clinical practice: do the needs manifested by the patients correspond to the priorities of the caring physicians? Findings from the EPINEEDS study. Epilepsy Behav 102:106641
Grazzi L, Bernstein C, Raggi A, Sansone E, Grignani E, Searl M, Rizzoli P (2019) ACT for migraine: effect of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for high-frequency episodic migraine without aura: preliminary data of a phase-II, multicentric, randomized, open-label study. Neurol Sci 40:191–192
Lattanzi S, Brigo F, Trinka E, Venieri F, Corradetti T, Dobran M, Silvestrini M (2019) Erenumab for preventive treatment of migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety. Drugs 79:417–431
Edvinsson L (2018) CGRP antibodies as prophylaxis in migraine. Cell 175:1719
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
All participants voluntarily signed the informed consent after the explanation of the study, ensuring the confidentiality of their personal data. This study was approved by the Ethics and Clinical Research Committee of La Princesa University Hospital.
Conflict of interest
None.
Ethical approval
None.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martínez-Fernández, A., Rueda Vega, M., Quintas, S. et al. Psychosocial repercussion of migraine: is it a stigmatized disease?. Neurol Sci 41, 2207–2213 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-04332-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-04332-6