Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spotting animals in natural scenes: efficiency of humans and monkeys at very low contrasts

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ability of monkeys to categorize objects in visual stimuli such as natural scenes might rely on sets of low-level visual cues without any underlying conceptual abilities. Using a go/no-go rapid animal/non-animal categorization task with briefly flashed achromatic natural scenes, we show that both human and monkey performance is very robust to large variations of stimulus luminance and contrast. When mean luminance was increased or decreased by 25–50%, accuracy and speed impairments were small. The largest impairment was found at the highest luminance value with monkeys being mainly impaired in accuracy (drop of 6% correct vs. <1.5% in humans), whereas humans were mainly impaired in reaction time (20 ms increase in median reaction time vs. 4 ms in monkeys). Contrast reductions induced a large deterioration of image definition, but performance was again remarkably robust. Subjects scored well above chance level, even when the contrast was only 12% of the original photographs (≈81% correct in monkeys; ≈79% correct in humans). Accuracy decreased with contrast reduction but only reached chance level -in both species- for the most extreme condition, when only 3% of the original contrast remained. A progressive reaction time increase was observed that reached 72 ms in monkeys and 66 ms in humans. These results demonstrate the remarkable robustness of the primate visual system in processing objects in natural scenes with large random variations in luminance and contrast. They illustrate the similarity with which performance is impaired in monkeys and humans with such stimulus manipulations. They finally show that in an animal categorization task, the performance of both monkeys and humans is largely independent of cues relying on global luminance or the fine definition of stimuli.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albrecht DG, Geisler WS, Frazor RA, Crane AM (2002) Visual cortex neurons of monkeys and cats: temporal dynamics of the contrast response function. J Neurophysiol 88:888–913

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Avidan G, Harel M, Hendler T, Ben-Bashat D, Zohary E, Malach R (2002) Contrast sensitivity in human visual areas and its relationship to object recognition. J Neurophysiol 87:3102–3116

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bar M (2004) Visual objects in context. Nat Rev Neurosci 5:617–629

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bentin S, Allison T, Puce A, Perez E, McCarthy G (1996) Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 8:551–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady TF, Konkle T, Alvarez GA, Oliva A (2008) Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:14325–14329

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bullier J (2001) Integrated model of visual processing. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 36:96–107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • D’Amato MR, Van Sant P (1988) The person concept in monkeys (Cebus apella). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 14:43–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delorme A, Richard G, Fabre-Thorpe M (2000) Ultra-rapid categorisation of natural scenes does not rely on colour cues: a study in monkeys and humans. Vision Res 40:2187–2200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delorme A, Rousselet GA, Macé MJ, Fabre-Thorpe M (2004) Interaction of top-down and bottom-up processing in the fast visual analysis of natural scenes. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 19:103–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fabre-Thorpe M, Richard G, Thorpe SJ (1998) Rapid categorization of natural images by rhesus monkeys. Neuroreport 9:303–308

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fabre-Thorpe M, Delorme A, Marlot C, Thorpe S (2001) A limit to the speed of processing in ultra-rapid visual categorization of novel natural scenes. J Cogn Neurosci 13:171–180

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fagot J, Cook RG (2006) Evidence for large long-term memory capacities in baboons and pigeons and its implications for learning and the evolution of cognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:17564–17567

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farah MJ, Wilson KD, Drain M, Tanaka JN (1998) What is “special” about face perception? Psychol Rev 105:482–498

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gegenfurtner KR, Rieger J (2000) Sensory and cognitive contributions of color to the recognition of natural scenes. Curr Biol 10:805–808

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Girard P, Jouffrais C, Kirchner H (2008) Ultra-rapid categorisation in non-human primates. Anim Cogn 11:485–493

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein RJ, Loveland DH (1964) Complex Visual Concept in the Pigeon. Science 146:549–551

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huber L, Lenz R (1993) A test of the linear feature model of polymorphous concept discrimination with pigeons. Q J Exp Psychol 46B:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber L, Troje NF, Loidolt M, Aust U, Grass D (2000) Natural categorization through multiple feature learning in pigeons. Q J Exp Psychol B 53:341–357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan E, Shapley RM (1986) The primate retina contains two types of ganglion cells, with high and low contrast sensitivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 83:2755–2757

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Macé MJ, Thorpe SJ, Fabre-Thorpe M (2005a) Rapid categorization of achromatic natural scenes: how robust at very low contrasts? Eur J Neurosci 21:2007–2018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Macé MJ, Richard G, Delorme A, Fabre-Thorpe M (2005b) Rapid categorization of natural scenes in monkeys: target predictability and processing speed. Neuroreport 16:349–354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Macé MJ, Joubert OR, Nespoulous J-L, Fabre-Thorpe M (2009) The time-course of visual categorizations: you spot the animal faster than the bird. PLoS One 4(6):e5927 http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005927

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Malivel J, Fagot J (2001) Cross-modal integration and conceptual categorization in baboons. Behav Brain Res 122:209–213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Malivel J, Mangini MC, Fagot J, Biederman I (2006) Do humans and baboons use the same information when categorizing human and baboon faces? Psychol Sci 17:599–607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Minamimoto T, La Camera G, Richmond BJ (2009) Measuring and Modeling the Interaction Among Reward Size, Delay to Reward, and Satiation Level on Motivation in Monkeys. J Neurophysiol 101:437–447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pong M, Fuchs AF (2000) Characteristics of the pupillary light reflex in the macaque monkey: metrics. J Neurophysiol 84:953–963

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts WA, Mazmanian DS (1988) Concept learning at different levels of abstraction by pigeons, monkeys, and people. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 14:247–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolls ET, Baylis GC (1986) Size and contrast have only small effects on the responses to faces of neurons in the cortex of the superior temporal sulcus of the monkey. Exp Brain Res 65:38–48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosch E, Mervis CB, Gray WD, Johnson DM, Boyes-Braem P (1976) Basic objects in natural categories. Cogn Psychol 8:382–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schyns PG, Oliva A (1994) From blobs to boundary edges—evidence for time-scale-dependent and spatial-scale-dependent scene recognition. Psychological Science 5:195–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman SM (1985) Functional organization of the W-, X- and Y-cell pathways in the cat: a review and hypothesis. In: Sprague JM, Epstein AN (eds) Progress in psychobiology and physiological psychology, vol 11. Academic Press, New York, pp 233–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence I, Wong P, Rusan M, Rastegar N (2006) How color enhances visual memory for natural scenes. Psychol Sci 17:1–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strasburger H, Rentschler I (1996) Contrast-dependent dissociation of visual recognition and detection fields. Eur J Neurosci 8:1787–1791

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strasburger H, Harvey LO Jr, Rentschler I (1991) Contrast thresholds for identification of numeric characters in direct and eccentric view. Percept Psychophys 49:495–508

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Troje NF, Huber L, Loidolt M, Aust U, Fieder M (1999) Categorical learning in pigeons: the role of texture and shape in complex static stimuli. Vision Res 39:353–366

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vogels R (1999) Categorization of complex visual images by rhesus monkeys. Part 1: behavioural study. Eur J Neurosci 11:1223–1238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Von Fersen L, Lea SEG (1990) Category discrimination by pigeons using five polymorphous features. J Exp Anal Behav 54:69–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wichmann FA, Sharpe LT, Gegenfurtner KR (2002) The contributions of color to recognition memory for natural scenes. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 28:509–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winn B, Whitaker D, Elliott DB, Phillips NJ (1994) Factors affecting light-adapted pupil size in normal human subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 35:1132–1137

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yao AY, Einhauser W (2008) Color aids late but not early stages of rapid natural scene recognition. J Vis 8(12):11–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the CNRS, the University Paul Sabatier (Toulouse III), the French government and the “Programme Cognitique”. We would like to thank S. Thorpe for helpful comments and corrections.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Marc J.-M. Macé

    Present address: Université de Toulouse, UPS, CNRS, IRIT, 118 route de Narbonne, Toulouse, France

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Université de Toulouse, UPS, Centre de recherche Cerveau et Cognition, 133 route de Narbonne, Toulouse, France

    Marc J.-M. Macé, Arnaud Delorme, Ghislaine Richard & Michèle Fabre-Thorpe

  2. CNRS, CerCo, Toulouse, France

    Marc J.-M. Macé, Arnaud Delorme, Ghislaine Richard & Michèle Fabre-Thorpe

Authors
  1. Marc J.-M. Macé
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Arnaud Delorme
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ghislaine Richard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michèle Fabre-Thorpe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michèle Fabre-Thorpe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Macé, M.JM., Delorme, A., Richard, G. et al. Spotting animals in natural scenes: efficiency of humans and monkeys at very low contrasts. Anim Cogn 13, 405–418 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-009-0290-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-009-0290-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation