Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Myositis-specific autoantibodies and their association with malignancy in Italian patients with polymyositis and dermatomyositis

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to characterize myositis-specific antibodies in a well-defined cohort of patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy and to determine their association with cancer. Sera from 40 patients with polymyositis, dermatomyositis, and controls were tested by protein and RNA immunoprecipitation to detect autoantibodies, and immunoprecipitation-Western blot was used for anti-MJ/NXP-2, anti-MDA5, and anti-TIF1γ/α identification. Medical records were re-evaluated with specific focus on cancer. Anti-MJ/NXP-2 and anti-TIF1γ/α were the most common antibodies in dermatomyositis. In six dermatomyositis cases, we found five solid forms of cancer and one Hodgkin’s lymphoma in long-term remission. Among patients with cancer-associated dermatomyositis, three were positive for anti-TIF1γ/α, two for anti-Mi-2, and one for anti-MJ/NXP-2. The strongest positivity of anti-TIF1γ was seen in two active forms of cancer, and this antibody was either negative or positive at low titers in the absence of cancer or in the 7-year remission Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Four out of twenty (20 %) patients with polymyositis had solid cancer, but no specific association with autoantibodies was identified; further, none of the four cases of antisynthetase syndrome had a history of cancer. No serum myositis-associated autoantibody was observed in control sera, resulting in positive predictive value 75 %, negative predictive value 78.5 %, sensitivity 50 %, specificity 92 %, and area under the ROC curve 0.7083 for the risk of paraneoplastic DM in anti-TIF1γ/α (+) patients. Myositis-specific autoantibodies can be identified thanks to the use of immunoprecipitation, and their association with cancer is particularly clear for anti-TIF1γ/α in dermatomyositis. This association should be evaluated in a prospective study by immunoprecipitation in clinical practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lundberg IE et al (2016) Diagnosis and classification of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. J Intern Med 280(1):39–51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ceribelli A. et al. (2016) The Immune Response and the Pathogenesis of Idiopathic Inflammatory Myositis: a Critical Review. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol

  3. Gunawardena H. (2015) The Clinical Features of Myositis-Associated Autoantibodies: a Review. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol

  4. Satoh M. et al. (2015) A Comprehensive Overview on Myositis-Specific Antibodies: New and Old Biomarkers in Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol

  5. Targoff IN (1992) Autoantibodies in polymyositis. Rheum Dis Clin N Am 18(2):455–482

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ceribelli A et al (2014) Prevalence and clinical significance of anti-MDA5 antibodies in European patients with polymyositis/dermatomyositis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 32(6):891–897

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Satoh M et al (2012) Autoantibodies to transcription intermediary factor TIF1beta associated with dermatomyositis. Arthritis Res Ther 14(2):R79

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Fiorentino DF et al (2016) PUF60: a prominent new target of the autoimmune response in dermatomyositis and Sjogren's syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 75(6):1145–1151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ceribelli A et al (2010) Anti-Th/To are common antinucleolar autoantibodies in Italian patients with scleroderma. J Rheumatol 37(10):2071–2075

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ceribelli A et al (2012) Anti-MJ/NXP-2 autoantibody specificity in a cohort of adult Italian patients with polymyositis/dermatomyositis. Arthritis Res Ther 14(2):R97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Yamasaki Y et al (2016) Clinical subsets associated with different anti-aminoacyl transfer RNA synthetase antibodies and their association with coexisting anti-Ro52. Mod Rheumatol 26(3):403–409

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Palaniappan P, Lionel AP, Kumar S (2014) Successful treatment of calcinosis cutis in juvenile dermatomyositis with pamidronate. J Clin Rheumatol 20(8):454–455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rider LG et al (2013) The myositis autoantibody phenotypes of the juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Medicine (Baltimore) 92(4):223–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ichimura Y et al (2012) Anti-NXP2 autoantibodies in adult patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: possible association with malignancy. Ann Rheum Dis 71(5):710–713

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tiniakou, E. and A.L. Mammen, Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies and Malignancy: a Comprehensive Review. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol, 2015.

  16. Selva-O'Callaghan A et al (2010) Malignancy and myositis: novel autoantibodies and new insights. Curr Opin Rheumatol 22(6):627–632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Targoff IN et al (2006) A novel autoantibody to a 155-kd protein is associated with dermatomyositis. Arthritis Rheum 54(11):3682–3689

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gunawardena H et al (2008) Clinical associations of autoantibodies to a p155/140 kDa doublet protein in juvenile dermatomyositis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 47(3):324–328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kaji K et al (2007) Identification of a novel autoantibody reactive with 155 and 140 kDa nuclear proteins in patients with dermatomyositis: an association with malignancy. Rheumatology (Oxford) 46(1):25–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chinoy H et al (2007) The diagnostic utility of myositis autoantibody testing for predicting the risk of cancer-associated myositis. Ann Rheum Dis 66(10):1345–1349

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Fujikawa K et al (2009) Association of distinct clinical subsets with myositis-specific autoantibodies towards anti-155/140-kDa polypeptides, anti-140-kDa polypeptides, and anti-aminoacyl tRNA synthetases in Japanese patients with dermatomyositis: a single-centre, cross-sectional study. Scand J Rheumatol 38(4):263–267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Selmi C et al (2016) Serum antinuclear and extractable nuclear antigen antibody prevalence and associated morbidity and mortality in the general population over 15 years. Autoimmun Rev 15(2):162–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cavazzana I et al (2016) Testing for myositis specific autoantibodies: comparison between line blot and immunoprecipitation assays in 57 myositis sera. J Immunol Methods 433:1–5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chan EK et al (2016) Report on the second International Consensus on ANA Pattern (ICAP) workshop in Dresden 2015. Lupus 25(8):797–804

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the JSPS KAKENHI (Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research) Grant Number 15K08790 for MS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlo Selmi.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ceribelli, A., Isailovic, N., De Santis, M. et al. Myositis-specific autoantibodies and their association with malignancy in Italian patients with polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Clin Rheumatol 36, 469–475 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-016-3453-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-016-3453-0

Keywords

Navigation