Skip to main content
Log in

First carpometacarpal and interphalangeal osteoarthritis of the hand in patients with advanced hip or knee OA. Are there differences in the aetiology?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Differences in the aetiology of osteoarthritis (OA) of the first carpometacarpal joints (CMC-1) and the interphalangeal joints (IP) have been reported. It was the purpose of this investigation to evaluate whether isolated OA of the first carpometacarpal joints and the interphalangeal joints differs in its aetiology, considering potential risk factors such as age, gender, body mass index, occupational history, OA in the hip or knee joints, hypertension and diabetes in patients with advanced hip or knee OA. Included in this investigation were 639 patients scheduled for either hip or knee replacement because of advanced OA. As well as a standardised interview and clinical examination, bilateral radiographs of both hands were obtained. According to the presence or absence of radiographic OA, participants were categorised as having CMC-1 OA (= 1 joint) or IP OA (= 2 joints), either isolated or in combination. Odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for potential determinants of OA were estimated using multivariable logistic regression.Of the total number of patients, 184 had CMC-1 OA and 424 IP OA. Patients with CMC-1 OA were more likely to be female (77.2%), and to have knee OA (62.5%) and hypertension (63.0%), than patients without CMC-1 OA. No differences between CMC-1 OA and IP OA were observed for the role of age, body mass index and diabetes. Age was associated with both CMC and IP OA. Female gender was independently associated with CMC-1 OA (OR=1.79; 95% CI: 1.16–2.74) but not with IP OA. Our data suggest a possible impact of age and female gender on the aetiology of CMC-1 OA and of age on IP-OA, at least in patients with advanced hip or knee OA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

OA:

Osteoarthritis

CMC:

Carpometacarpal

IP:

Interphalangeal

DIP:

Distal interphalangeal

PIP:

Proximal interphalangeal

JSN:

Joint space narrowing

References

  1. Van Saase JL, Van Romunde LKJ, Cats A, Vandenbroucke JP, Valkenburg HA (1989) Epidemiology of osteoarthritis: Zoetermeer survey. Ann Rheum Dis 48:271–280

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cushnaghan J, Dieppe P (1991) Study of 500 patients with limb joint osteoarthritis. I. Analysis by age, sex, and distribution of symptomatic joint sites. Ann Rheum Dis 50: 8–13

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kessler S, Dieppe P, Fuchs J, Stuermer T, Guenther KP (2000) Assessing the prevalence of hand osteoarthritis in epidemiological studies. The reliability of a radiological hand scale. Ann Rheum Dis 59: 289–292

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Egger P, Cooper C, Hart DJ, Doyle DV, Coggon D, Spector TD (1995) Patterns of joint involvement in osteoarthritis of the hand: the Chingford Study. J Rheumatol 22: 1509–1513

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kallman DA, Wigley FM, Scott WW Jr, Hochberg MC, Tobin JD (1990) The longitudinal course of hand osteoarthritis in a male population. Arthritis Rheum 33:1323–1332

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Plato CH, Norris A (1979) Osteoarthritis of the hand: Longitudinal studies. Am J Epidemiol 110: 740–746

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dieppe P (1984) Osteoarthritis: are we asking the wrong question? Br J Rheumatol 23:161–165

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hadler NM, Gillings DB, Imbus HR et al. (1978) . Hand structure and function in an industrial setting. Arthritis-Rheum 2: 210–220

    Google Scholar 

  9. Davis M (1988) Epidemiology of osteoarthritis. Clin Geriatr Med 4: 241–255

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Peyron JG (1979) Epidemiologic and etiologic approach of osteoarthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 8:288–306

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Peyron JG (1986) Osteoarthritis: The epidemiologic viewpoint. Clin Orthop 213:9-13

    Google Scholar 

  12. Spector TD, Cicuttini F, Baker J, Loughlin J, Hart D (1996) Genetic influences on osteoarthritis in women: a twin study. Br Med J 312: 940–943

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Guenther KP, Stürmer T, Sauerland S et al. (1998) Prevalence of generalized osteoarthritis in patients with degenerative disease of hip and knee joints: the Ulm osteoarthritis study. Ann Rheum Dis 57:717–723

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Altman RD, Hochberg M, Murphy W, Wolfe F, Lequesne M (1995) Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 3(Suppl A):3–70

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 16:494–501

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1963) Atlas of standard radiographs: the epidemiology of chronic rheumatism, Vol 2. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications

  17. Lawrence JS, Bremner JM, Biers F (1966) Osteoarthritis. Prevalence in the population and relationship between symtoms and x-ray chages. Ann Rheum Dis 25:1–5

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lawrence JS (1977) Rheumatism in populations. London, Heinemann

  19. Aspelund G, Gunnarsdottir S, Jonsson P, Jonsson H (1996) Hand osteoarthritis in the elderly. Scand J Rheumatol 25:34–36

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cushnaghan J, Dieppe P (1991) Study of 500 patients with limb joint osteoarthritis. I. Analysis by age, sex, and distribution of symptomatic joint sites. Ann Rheum Dis 50: 8–13

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Spector TD, Hart DJ, Brown P et al. (1991). Frequency of osteoarthritis in hysterectomized women. J Rheumatol 18: 1877–1883

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Davis MA, Neuhaus JM, Ettinger WH, Muller WH (1990) Body fat distribution and osteoarthritis. Am J Epidemiol 132:701–707

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bagge E, Bjelle A, Eden S, Svanborg A (1991) Factors associated with radiographic osteoarthritis: results from the population study of 70-year-old people in Goteborg. J Rheumatol 18:1218–1222

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hart DJ, Spector TD (1993) The relationship of obesity, fat distribution and osteoarthritis in women in the general population: The Chingford study. J Rheumatol 20:331–335

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sowers M, Zobel D, Weissfeld L, Hawthorne VM, Carman W (1991) Progression of osteoarthritis of the hand and metacarpal bone loss. A twenty-year followup of incident cases. Arthritis Rheum 34: 36–42

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hochberg MC, Lethbridge-Cejku M, Plato CC, Wigley FM, Tobin JD (1991) Factors associated with osteoarthritis of the hand in males: data from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Am J Epidemiol 134:1121–1127

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lawrence JS (1961) Rheumatism in cotton operatives. Br J Indust Med 18:270–276

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Dieppe P (1994) Osteoarthritis. In: Klippel J, Dieppe P, eds. Rheumatology. London, Mosby Year Book-Europe

  29. Lawrence JS (1975) Hypertension in relation to musculoskeletal disorders. Ann Rheum Dis 74:451–456

    Google Scholar 

  30. Waine H, Nevinny D, Rosenthal J (1961) Association of osteoarthritis and diabetes mellitus. Tufts Folia Med 7:13–19

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Kessler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kessler, S., Stöve, J., Puhl, W. et al. First carpometacarpal and interphalangeal osteoarthritis of the hand in patients with advanced hip or knee OA. Are there differences in the aetiology?. Clin Rheumatol 22, 409–413 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-003-0783-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-003-0783-5

Keywords

Navigation