Abstract
Faynzilberg and Kumar (Rev Econ Design 5(1):23–58, 2000) show that the usual Mirrlees–Rogerson conditions to validate the first-order approach in moral hazard agency models are no longer valid in the generalized agency case. They consider the risk-averse agent case and identify one set of technological conditions, where the production technology satisfies the linear distribution function condition in actions and types, that validates ex-ante the first-order approach. With the usefulness of their decomposition approach, we show that the first-order approach in the generalized agency case can be checked ex-ante under the Mirrlees–Rogerson conditions when the agent is risk-neutral but there is a binding limited liability constraint on the agent’s wage.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Caillaud B, Guesnerie R, Rey P (1992) Noisy observation in adverse selection models. Rev Econ Stud 59:595–615
Demski J, Sappington D (1988) Incentive schemes with multiple agents and bankruptcy constraints. J Econ Theory 44:156–167
Faynzilberg PS, Kumar P (1997) Optimal contracting of separable production technologies. Games Econ Behav 21:15–39
Faynzilberg PS, Kumar P (2000) On the generalized principal-agent problem: decomposition and existence results. Rev Econ Des 5(1):23–58
Gary-Bobo R, Spiegel Y (2006) Optimal state-contingent regulation under limited liability. Rand J Econ 37:430–447
Innes R (1990) Limited liability and incentive contracting with ex-ante action choices. J Econ Theory 52:45–67
Laffont JJ, Tirole J (1986) Using cost observation to regulate firms. J Polit Econ 94:614–641
Picard P (1987) On the design of incentive schemes under moral hazard and adverse selection. J Public Econ 33:305–331
Sappington D (1983) Limited liability contracts between principal and agent. J Econ Theory 29:1–21
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ollier, S. On the generalized principal-agent problem: a comment. Rev. Econ. Design 11, 1–11 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10058-007-0025-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10058-007-0025-4