Skip to main content
Log in

On the generalized principal-agent problem: a comment

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Review of Economic Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Faynzilberg and Kumar (Rev Econ Design 5(1):23–58, 2000) show that the usual Mirrlees–Rogerson conditions to validate the first-order approach in moral hazard agency models are no longer valid in the generalized agency case. They consider the risk-averse agent case and identify one set of technological conditions, where the production technology satisfies the linear distribution function condition in actions and types, that validates ex-ante the first-order approach. With the usefulness of their decomposition approach, we show that the first-order approach in the generalized agency case can be checked ex-ante under the Mirrlees–Rogerson conditions when the agent is risk-neutral but there is a binding limited liability constraint on the agent’s wage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Caillaud B, Guesnerie R, Rey P (1992) Noisy observation in adverse selection models. Rev Econ Stud 59:595–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demski J, Sappington D (1988) Incentive schemes with multiple agents and bankruptcy constraints. J Econ Theory 44:156–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faynzilberg PS, Kumar P (1997) Optimal contracting of separable production technologies. Games Econ Behav 21:15–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faynzilberg PS, Kumar P (2000) On the generalized principal-agent problem: decomposition and existence results. Rev Econ Des 5(1):23–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Gary-Bobo R, Spiegel Y (2006) Optimal state-contingent regulation under limited liability. Rand J Econ 37:430–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innes R (1990) Limited liability and incentive contracting with ex-ante action choices. J Econ Theory 52:45–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laffont JJ, Tirole J (1986) Using cost observation to regulate firms. J Polit Econ 94:614–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picard P (1987) On the design of incentive schemes under moral hazard and adverse selection. J Public Econ 33:305–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sappington D (1983) Limited liability contracts between principal and agent. J Econ Theory 29:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandrine Ollier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ollier, S. On the generalized principal-agent problem: a comment. Rev. Econ. Design 11, 1–11 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10058-007-0025-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10058-007-0025-4

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation