Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Initiales Management von Patienten mit akutem Koronarsyndrom

Abschnitt 5 der Leitlinien zur Reanimation 2005 des European Resuscitation Council

  • Schwerpunkt: ERC-Leitlinien
  • Published:
Notfall + Rettungsmedizin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. Tunstall-Pedoe H, Vanuzzo D, Hobbs M et al. (2000) Estimation of contribution of changes in coronary care to improving survival, event rates, and coronary heart disease mortality across the WHO MONICA Project populations. Lancet 355: 688–700

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lowel H, Meisinger C, Heier M et al. (2002) Sex specific trends of sudden cardiac death and acute myocardial infarction: results of the population-based KORA/MONICA-Augsburg register 1985 to 1998. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 127: 2311–2316

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. European Society Cardiology (2000) Myocardial infarction redefined — a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 36: 959–969

    Google Scholar 

  4. Van de Werf F, Ardissino D, Betriu A et al. (2003) Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. The Task Force on the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 24: 28–66

    Google Scholar 

  5. Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW et al. (2004) ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction — executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 110: 588–636

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Douglas PS, Ginsburg GS (1996) The evaluation of chest pain in women. N Engl J Med 334: 1311–1315

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Solomon CG, Lee TH, Cook EF et al. (1989) Comparison of clinical presentation of acute myocardial infarction in patients older than 65 years of age to younger patients: the Multicenter Chest Pain Study experience. Am J Cardiol 63: 772–776

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kereiakes DJ, Gibler WB, Martin LH, Pieper KS, Anderson LC (1992) Relative importance of emergency medical system transport and the prehospital electrocardiogram on reducing hospital time delay to therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a preliminary report from the Cincinnati Heart Project. Am Heart J 123: 835–840

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Canto JG, Rogers WJ, Bowlby LJ, French WJ, Pearce DJ, Weaver WD (1997) The prehospital electrocardiogram in acute myocardial infarction: is its full potential being realized? National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol 29: 498–505

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Aufderheide TP, Hendley GE, Thakur RK et al. (1990) The diagnostic impact of prehospital 12-lead electrocardiography. Ann Emerg Med 19: 1280–1287

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Foster DB, Dufendach JH, Barkdoll CM, Mitchell BK (1994) Prehospital recognition of AMI using independent nurse/paramedic 12-lead ECG evaluation: impact on in-hospital times to thrombolysis in a rural community hospital. Am J Emerg Med 12: 25–31

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Millar-Craig MW, Joy AV, Adamowicz M, Furber R, Thomas B (1997) Reduction in treatment delay by paramedic ECG diagnosis of myocardial infarction with direct CCU admission. Heart 78: 456–461

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Brinfield K (1998) Identification of ST elevation AMI on prehospital 12 lead ECG; Accuracy of unaided paramedic interpretation. J Emerg Med 16: 22

    Google Scholar 

  14. Antman EM, Tanasijevic MJ, Thompson B et al. (1996) Cardiac-specific troponin I levels to predict the risk of mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 335: 1342–1349

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schuchert A, Hamm C, Scholz J, Klimmeck S, Goldmann B, Meinertz T (1999) Prehospital testing for troponin T in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 138: 45–48

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rawles JM, Kenmure AC (1976) Controlled trial of oxygen in uncomplicated myocardial infarction. BMJ 1: 1121–1123

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group (1988) Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 2: 349–360

  18. Gurfinkel EP, Manos EJ, Mejail RI et al. (1995) Low molecular weight heparin versus regular heparin or aspirin in the treatment of unstable angina and silent ischemia. J Am Coll Cardiol 26: 313–318

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Freimark D, Matetzky S, Leor J et al. (2002) Timing of aspirin administration as a determinant of survival of patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolysis. Am J Cardiol 89: 381–385

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Husted SE, Kristensen SD, Vissinger H, Morn B, Schmidt EB, Nielsen HK (1992) Intravenous acetylsalicylic acid — dose-related effects on platelet function and fibrinolysis in healthy males. Thromb Haemost 68: 226–229

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fibrinolytic Therapy Trialists‘ (FTT) Collaborative Group (1994) Indications for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction: collaborative overview of early mortality and major morbidity results from all randomised trials of more than 1000 patients. Lancet 343: 311–322

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell’Infarto Miocardico (GISSI) (1986) Effectiveness of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1: 397–402

    Google Scholar 

  23. The GUSTO investigators (1993) An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 329: 673–682

    Google Scholar 

  24. Boersma E, Maas AC, Deckers JW, Simoons ML (1996) Early thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction: reappraisal of the golden hour. Lancet 348: 771–775

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. De Luca G, van’t Hof AW, de Boer MJ et al. (2004) Time-to-treatment significantly affects the extent of ST-segment resolution and myocardial blush in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated by primary angioplasty. Eur Heart J 25: 1009–1013

    Google Scholar 

  26. Morrison LJ, Verbeek PR, McDonald AC, Sawadsky BV, Cook DJ (2000) Mortality and prehospital thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis. JAMA 283: 2686–2692

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Welsh RC, Goldstein P, Adgey J et al. (2004) Variations in pre-hospital fibrinolysis process of care: insights from the Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic 3 Plus international acute myocardial infarction pre-hospital care survey. Eur J Emerg Med 11: 134–140

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Weaver W, Cerqueira M, Hallstrom A et al. (1993) Prehospital-initiated vs hospital-initiated thrombolytic therapy: the Myocardial Infacrtion Triage and Intervention Trial (MITI). JAMA 270: 1203–1210

    Google Scholar 

  29. European Myocardial Infarction Project Group (EMIP) (1993) Prehospital thrombolytic therapy in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. The European Myocardial Infarction Project Group. N Engl J Med 329: 383–389

    Google Scholar 

  30. White HD (2000) Debate: Should the elderly receive thrombolytic therapy, or primary angioplasty? Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine 1: 150–154

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Weaver WD, Simes RJ, Betriu A et al. (1997) Comparison of primary coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review. JAMA 278: 2093–2098

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL (2003) Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet 361: 13–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Widimsky P, Budesinsky T, Vorac D et al. (2003) Long distance transport for primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. Final results of the randomized national multicentre trial — PRAGUE-2. Eur Heart J 24: 94–104

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Steg PG, Bonnefoy E, Chabaud S et al. (2003) Impact of time to treatment on mortality after prehospital fibrinolysis or primary angioplasty: data from the CAPTIM randomized clinical trial. Circulation 108: 2851–2856

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Dalby M, Bouzamondo A, Lechat P, Montalescot G (2003) Transfer for primary angioplasty versus immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. Circulation 108: 1809–1814

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Scheller B, Hennen B, Hammer B et al. (2003) Beneficial effects of immediate stenting after thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 42: 634–641

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Fernandez-Aviles F, Alonso JJ, Castro-Beiras A et al. (2004) Routine invasive strategy within 24 hours of thrombolysis versus ischaemia-guided conservative approach for acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation (GRACIA-1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 364: 1045–1053

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG et al. (1999) Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med 341: 625–634

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, White HD et al. (2001) One-year survival following early revascularization for cardiogenic shock. JAMA 285: 190–192

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Antman EM, McCabe CH, Gurfinkel EP et al. (1999) Enoxaparin prevents death and cardiac ischemic events in unstable angina/non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Results of the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 11B trial. Circulation 100: 1593–1601

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Cohen M, Demers C, Gurfinkel EP et al. (1997) A comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin with unfractionated heparin for unstable coronary artery disease. Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non-Q-Wave Coronary Events Study Group. N Engl J Med 337: 447–452

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Petersen JL, Mahaffey KW, Hasselblad V et al. (2004) Efficacy and bleeding complications among patients randomized to enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin for antithrombin therapy in non-ST-Segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: a systematic overview. JAMA 292: 89–96

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ferguson JJ, Califf RM, Antman EM et al. (2004) Enoxaparin vs unfractionated heparin in high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes managed with an intended early invasive strategy: primary results of the SYNERGY randomized trial. JAMA 292: 45–54

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Van de Werf FJ, Armstrong PW, Granger C, Wallentin L (2001) Efficacy and safety of tenecteplase in combination with enoxaparin, abciximab, or unfractionated heparin: The ASSENT-3 randomised trial in acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 358: 605–613

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wallentin L, Goldstein P, Armstrong PW et al. (2003) Efficacy and safety of tenecteplase in combination with the low-molecular-weight heparin enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin in the prehospital setting: the Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic Regimen (ASSENT)-3 PLUS randomized trial in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 108: 135–142

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Boersma E, Harrington RA, Moliterno DJ et al. (2002) Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis of all major randomised clinical trials. Lancet 359: 189–398

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Simoons ML (2001) Effect of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blocker abciximab on outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes without early coronary revascularisation: the GUSTO IV-ACS randomised trial. Lancet 357: 1915–1924

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Topol EJ (2001) Reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction with fibrinolytic therapy or combination reduced fibrinolytic therapy and platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition: the GUSTO V randomised trial. Lancet 357: 1905–1914

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Montalescot G, Borentain M, Payot L, Collet JP, Thomas D (2004) Early vs late administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in primary percutaneous coronary intervention of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. JAMA 292: 362–366

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. van’t Hof AW, Ernst N, de Boer MJ et al. (2004) Facilitation of primary coronary angioplasty by early start of a glycoprotein 2b/3a inhibitor: results of the ongoing tirofiban in myocardial infarction evaluation (On-TIME) trial. Eur Heart J 25: 837–846

    Google Scholar 

  51. CAPRIE Steering Committee (1996) A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). Lancet 348: 1329–1339

    Google Scholar 

  52. Yusuf S, Zhao F, Mehta SR, Chrolavicius S, Tognoni G, Fox KK (2001) Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med 345: 494–502

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Mehta SR, Yusuf S, Peters RJ et al. (2001) Effects of pretreatment with clopidogrel and aspirin followed by long-term therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the PCI-CURE study. Lancet 358: 527–533

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Steinhubl SR, Berger PB, Mann JT 3rd et al. (2002) Early and sustained dual oral antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 288: 2411–2420

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Sabatine MS, Cannon CP, Gibson CM et al. (2005) Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin and fibrinolytic therapy for myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med 352: 1179–1189

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. The MIAMI Trial Research Group (1985) Metoprolol in acute myocardial infarction (MIAMI): a randomised placebo-controlled international trial. Eur Heart J 6: 199–226

    Google Scholar 

  57. First International Study of Infarct Survival Collaborative Group (1986) Randomised trial of intravenous atenolol among 16 027 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-1. Lancet 2: 57–66

    Google Scholar 

  58. Halkin A, Grines CL, Cox DA et al. (2004) Impact of intravenous beta-blockade before primary angioplasty on survival in patients undergoing mechanical reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 43: 1780–1787

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Campbell RW, Murray A, Julian DG (1981) Ventricular arrhythmias in first 12 hours of acute myocardial infarction: natural history study. Br Heart J 46: 351–357

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. O’Doherty M, Tayler DI, Quinn E, Vincent R, Chamberlain DA (1983) Five hundred patients with myocardial infarction monitored within one hour of symptoms. BMJ 286: 1405–1408

    Google Scholar 

  61. Teo KK, Yusuf S, Furberg CD (1993) Effects of prophylactic antiarrhythmic drug therapy in acute myocardial infarction. An overview of results from randomized controlled trials. JAMA 270: 1589–1595

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Sadowski ZP, Alexander JH, Skrabucha B et al. (1999) Multicenter randomized trial and a systematic overview of lidocaine in acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 137: 792–798

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. McAlister FA, Teo KK (1997) Antiarrhythmic therapies for the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Drugs 54: 235–252

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. ISIS-4 (Fourth International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group (1995) A randomised factorial trial assessing early oral captopril, oral mononitrate, and intravenous magnesium sulphate in 58,050 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 345: 669–685

  65. Teo KK, Yusuf S, Pfeffer M et al. (2002) Effects of long-term treatment with angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors in the presence or absence of aspirin: a systematic review. Lancet 360: 1037–1043

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. ACE Inhibitor MI Collaborative Group (1998) Indications for ACE inhibitors in the early treatment of acute myocardial infarction: systematic overview of individual data from 100,000 patients in randomized trials. Circulation 97: 2202–2212

    Google Scholar 

  67. Swedberg K, Held P, Kjekshus J, Rasmussen K, Ryden L, Wedel H (1992) Effects of the early administration of enalapril on mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Results of the Cooperative New Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study II. N Engl J Med 327: 678–684

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Heeschen C, Hamm CW, Laufs U, Snapinn S, Bohm M, White HD (2002) Withdrawal of statins increases event rates in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation 105: 1446–1452

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt:

Es besteht kein Interessenkonflikt. Der korrespondierende Autor versichert, dass keine Verbindungen mit einer Firma, deren Produkt in dem Artikel genannt ist, oder einer Firma, die ein Konkurrenzprodukt vertreibt, bestehen. Die Präsentation des Themas ist unabhängig und die Darstellung der Inhalte produktneutral.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medizinische Klinik II, Charité, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin

    H. R. Arntz, L. Bossart & G. Fillipatos

  2. Medizinische Klinik II, Charité, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12200, Berlin

    H. R. Arntz

Authors
  1. H. R. Arntz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L. Bossart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. Fillipatos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. R. Arntz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arntz, H.R., Bossart, L. & Fillipatos, G. Initiales Management von Patienten mit akutem Koronarsyndrom. Notfall + Rettungsmedizin 9, 81–89 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10049-006-0794-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10049-006-0794-2

Search

Navigation