Skip to main content
Log in

Gaussian weak classifiers based on co-occurring Haar-like features for face detection

  • Industrial and Commercial Application
  • Published:
Pattern Analysis and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, in the context of appearance-based face detection, it has been shown by Mita et al. that weak classifiers based on co-occurring, or multiple, Haar-like features provide better speed-accuracy trade-off than the widely used Viola and Jones’s weak classifiers, which use only a single Haar-like feature. In this paper, we extend Mita et al.’s work by proposing Gaussian weak classifiers that fuse information obtained from the co-occurring features at the feature level, and are potentially more discriminative. Experimental results, on the standard MIT+CMU test images, show that the face detectors built using Gaussian weak classifiers achieve up to 38 % more accuracy in terms of false positives and 42 % decrease in testing time when compared to the detectors built using Mita et al.’s weak classifiers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Levi K, Weiss Y (2004) Learning object detection from a small number of examples:the importance of good features. In: Proceedings of international conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, vol. 2, Washington, DC, USA, pp 53–60

  2. Papageorgiou CP, Oren M, Poggio T (1998) A general framework for objectdetection. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV ’98). Washington, DC, USA, pp 555–562

  3. Viola P, Jones MJ (2004) Robust real-time face detection. Int J Comput Vis 57(2):137–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Schapire RE (1999) A brief introduction to boosting. In: Proceedings of the international joint conference on artificial intelligence, San Francisco, CA, USA, pp 1401–1406

  5. Baker S, Nayar SK (1996) Pattern rejection. In: Proceedings of the conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, San Francisco, CA, USA, pp 544–549

  6. Mita T, Kaneko T, Stenger B, Hori O (2008) Discriminative feature co-occurrence selection for object detection. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 30(7):1257–1269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pavani SK, Delgado D, Frangi AF (2009) Gaussian weak classifiers based onHaar-like features with four rectangles for real-time face detection. In: Proceedings of the international conference on computer analysis of images and patterns. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5702, Münster, Germany, pp 91–98.

  8. Jain A, Zongker D (1997) Feature selection: evaluation, application, and small sample performance. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 19(2):153–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mumford D, Gidas B (2001) Stochastic models for generic images. Q Appl Math LIV:85–111

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Wu J, Rehg JM, Mullin MD (2004) Learning a rare event detection cascade by direct feature selection. In: Proceedings of the conference on advances in neural information processing systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp 855–861

  11. Rowley HA, Baluja S, Kanade T (1998) Neural network-based face detection. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 20(1):23–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuncheva LI, Whitaker CJ, Shipp CA, Duin RPW (2003) Limits on the majority vote accuracy in classifier fusion. Pattern Anal Appl 6:22–31

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu W, Wu Z, Pan G (2004) An entropy-based diversity measure for classifiercombining and its application to face classifier ensemble thinning. In: Proceedings of the fifth chinese conference on biometric recognition. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3338, Guangzhou, China, pp 118–124

  14. Li SZ, Zhu L, Zhang Z, Blake A, Zhang H,Shum H (2002) Statistical learning of multi-view face detection. In: Proceedings of the european conference on computer vision. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2353, London, UK, pp 67–81

  15. Wu J, Brubaker SC, Mullin MD, Rehg JM (2008) Fast asymmetric learning for cascade face detection. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 30(3):369–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pham MT, Cham TJ (2007) Fast training and selection of Haar features using statistics in boosting-based face detection. In: Proceedings of international conference on computer vision, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, pp 1–7

  17. Schneiderman H (2000) A statistical approach to 3d object detection applied to faces and cars. Ph.D. thesis, Carnegie Mellon University

  18. Roth D, Yang M., Ahuja N (2000) A SNoW-based face detector. In: Proceedings of the conference on advances in neural information processing systems, Denver, CO, USA, pp 855–861

  19. Intel\(^{\circledR}\)integrated performance primitives 6.0 (2009) http://software.intel.com/en-us/intel-ipp/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sri-Kaushik Pavani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pavani, SK., Delgado-Gomez, D. & Frangi, A.F. Gaussian weak classifiers based on co-occurring Haar-like features for face detection. Pattern Anal Applic 17, 431–439 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10044-012-0295-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10044-012-0295-5

Keywords

Navigation