Abstract
Purpose
The penetration of hernia prevention techniques into surgical practice remains unknown.
Methods
A survey about knowledge/attitudes on hernia prevention was sent to the members of hernia societies.
Results
The 497 respondents were mostly from the US (47%) or Europe (40%). Most reported practicing, but not measuring their suture-to-wound length closure of > 4:1 (63%) and practicing but not measuring the number of stitches (58%). Reasons for not using short stitch closure were: does not apply to patient population (19%), not familiar enough with methods to correctly execute (25%), takes too long (13%), not reimbursed (4%), concerned about closure-related complications (27%), and other (22%). Regarding prophylactic mesh, respondents stated they were not familiar with literature (11%), familiar with literature but would not use (24%), familiar with literature and interested in use (45%), familiar with literature and using (15%), and other (5%).
Conclusions
There appears to be some application of hernia prevention principles related to fascial closure; however, the use of prophylactic mesh still appears to be controversial.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cobb WS, Kercher KW, Heniford BT (2005) Laparoscopic repair of incisional hernias. Surg Clin North Am 85:91–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2004.09.006 ix.
Mudge M, Hughes LE (1985) Incisional hernia: a 10 year prospective study of incidence and attitudes. Br J Surg 72:70–71
Osther PJ, Gjode P, Mortensen BB, Mortensen PB, Bartholin J, Gottrup F (1995) Randomized comparison of polyglycolic acid and polyglyconate sutures for abdominal fascial closure after laparotomy in patients with suspected impaired wound healing. Br J Surg 82:1080–1082
Israelsson LA, Jonsson T (1996) Incisional hernia after midline laparotomy: a prospective study. Eur J Surg 162:125–129
Poulose BK, Shelton J, Phillips S, Moore D, Nealon W, Penson D, Beck W, Holzman MD (2012) Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia research. Hernia 16:179–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-011-0879-9
Lopez-Cano M, Brandsma HT, Bury K, Hansson B, Kyle-Leinhase I, Alamino JG, Muysoms F (2017) Prophylactic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia after end colostomy: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Hernia 21:177–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-016-1563-x
Antoniou SA, Agresta F, Garcia Alamino JM, Berger D, Berrevoet F, Brandsma HT, Bury K, Conze J, Cuccurullo D, Dietz UA, Fortelny RH, Frei-Lanter C, Hansson B, Helgstrand F, Hotouras A, Janes A, Kroese LF, Lambrecht JR, Kyle-Leinhase I, Lopez-Cano M, Maggiori L, Mandala V, Miserez M, Montgomery A, Morales-Conde S, Prudhomme M, Rautio T, Smart N, Smietanski M, Szczepkowski M, Stabilini C, Muysoms FE (2017) European Hernia Society guidelines on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias. Hernia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1697-5
Muysoms FE, Antoniou SA, Bury K, Campanelli G, Conze J, Cuccurullo D, de Beaux AC, Deerenberg EB, East B, Fortelny RH, Gillion JF, Henriksen NA, Israelsson L, Jairam A, Janes A, Jeekel J, Lopez-Cano M, Miserez M, Morales-Conde S, Sanders DL, Simons MP, Smietanski M, Venclauskas L, Berrevoet F, European Hernia S (2015) European Hernia Society guidelines on the closure of abdominal wall incisions. Hernia 19:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1342-5
Muysoms FE, Detry O, Vierendeels T, Huyghe M, Miserez M, Ruppert M, Tollens T, Defraigne JO, Berrevoet F (2016) Prevention of incisional hernias by prophylactic mesh-augmented reinforcement of midline laparotomies for abdominal aortic aneurysm treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 263:638–645. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001369
Jairam AP, Timmermans L, Eker HH, Pierik R, van Klaveren D, Steyerberg EW, Timman R, van der Ham AC, Dawson I, Charbon JA, Schuhmacher C, Mihaljevic A, Izbicki JR, Fikatas P, Knebel P, Fortelny RH, Kleinrensink GJ, Lange JF, Jeekel HJ, Group PT (2017) Prevention of incisional hernia with prophylactic onlay and sublay mesh reinforcement versus primary suture only in midline laparotomies (PRIMA): 2-year follow-up of a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 390:567–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31332-6
Deerenberg EB, Harlaar JJ, Steyerberg EW, Lont HE, van Doorn HC, Heisterkamp J, Wijnhoven BP, Schouten WR, Cense HA, Stockmann HB, Berends FJ, Dijkhuizen FP, Dwarkasing RS, Jairam AP, van Ramshorst GH, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel J, Lange JF (2015) Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 386:1254–1260. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60459-7
Israelsson LA (2015) Abdominal incision closure: small but important bites. Lancet 386:1216–1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60687-0
Janes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA (2009) Preventing parastomal hernia with a prosthetic mesh: a 5-year follow-up of a randomized study. World J Surg 33:118–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9785-4 (discussion 122–113)
Israelsson LA, Millbourn D (2013) Prevention of incisional hernias: how to close a midline incision. Surg Clin North Am 93:1027–1040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2013.06.009
Williams ZF, Tenzel P, Hooks WB 3rd, Hope WW (2017) Suture to wound length ratio in abdominal wall closure: how well are we doing? Hernia 21:869–872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1667-y
Muysoms FE, Jairam A, López-Cano M, Śmietański M, Woeste G, Kyle-Leinhase I, Antoniou SA, Köckerling F, Köckerling BSG, Antoniou F, Fortelny S, Granderath R, Heiss FA, Mayer M, Miserez F, Montgomery M, Morales-Conde A, Muysoms S, Petter-Puchner F, Pointner A, Smart R, Smietanski N, Stechemesser M B (2016) Prevention of incisional hernias with biological mesh: a systematic review of the literature. Front Surg. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2016.00053
Walhberg A, Poom L (2015) An empirical test of nonresponse bias in internet surveys. Basic Appl Soc Psychol 37:336–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2015.1111212
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Dr. Hope declares the following potential conflicts of interest not directly related to the submitted work: has consulted for CR Bard/Davol, served as a speaker for Bard, WL Gore and Intuitive Surgical, and has received research funding from Bard and Gore. Dr. Fischer declares the following potential conflicts of interest not directly related to the submitted work: has consulted for Bard, WL Gore, and Allergan. Dr. López-Cano declares the following potential conflicts of interest not directly related to the submitted work: has received consultant fees from Bard, WL Gore, and B. Braun. Dr. Harris declares no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This study was deemed exempt by our Institutional Review Board.
Human and animal rights
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained by all survey participants.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fischer, J.P., Harris, H.W., López-Cano, M. et al. Hernia prevention: practice patterns and surgeons’ attitudes about abdominal wall closure and the use of prophylactic mesh. Hernia 23, 329–334 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-01894-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-01894-z