Skip to main content
Log in

Critical evaluation of an innovative mesh for bilateral transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair of inguinal hernias

  • How-I-Do-It
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Transabdominal preperitoneal hernia mesh plasty (TAPP) offers significant benefits to patients undergoing bilateral inguinal hernia repair. We evaluated a novel pre-shaped, large-pored, titanium-coated, lightweight polypropylene mesh for bilateral placement as an alternative to two separate meshes.

Methods

Thirty-six patients underwent elective surgical repair of bilateral inguinal hernias with the new mesh at three departments of surgery in Linz and Graz, Austria, between May 1, 2015 and June 30, 2017.

Results

All operations were completed without intraoperative complications or conversion to open procedures. The mean operation time was 74 min. There were no postoperative procedure-related complications with the exception of one hematoseroma of the spermatic cord. Two symptomatic medial recurrences (2/36 patients = 5.6%, 2/72 hernia repairs = 2.8%, respectively) after supravesical and medial hernia repair with the bilateral mesh were seen at structured follow-up examinations 6 and 12 months postoperatively.

Conclusion

Treatment of bilateral inguinal hernias with the newly designed bilateral mesh for TAPP theoretically brings benefits in terms of resistance to forces acting on the mesh. The larger area may decrease the risk for mesh bulging and recurrence, and one large mesh might provide more stable support than two separate meshes overlapping at the midline. The results of our study do not confirm these theoretical benefits regarding a high recurrence rate (2.8%) after treatment of medial hernia defects. We recommend re-designing the mesh with only a small central slit, which would provide a broader mesh bridge with sufficient overlap for all types of inguinal and femoral hernias, including medial and supravesical defects. After the mesh has been re-designed, a new study should evaluate its real benefits before it is marketed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Forse RA (2015) Clinical practice. Groin hernias in adults. N Engl J Med 372:756–763

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pahwa HS, Kumar A, Agarwal P, Agarwal AA (2015) Current trends in laparoscopic groin hernia repair: a review. World J Clin Cases 3(9):789–792

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. McCormack K, Scott N, Go PM, Ross SJ, Grant A (2003) Collaboration the EU Hernia Trialists Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pfeffer F, Riediger H, Küfner Lein R, Hopt UT (2008) Repair of bilateral inguinal hernias—sequential or simultaneous? Zentralbl Chir 133(5):446–451 (article in German)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wolloscheck T, Konerding MA (2009) Dimensions of the myopectineal orifice: a human cadaver study. Hernia 13(6):639–642

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. HerniaSurge Group (2018) International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia 22(1):1–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stoppa R, Petit J, Abourachid H, Henry X, Duclaye C, Monchaux G, Hillebrant JP (1973) Original procedure of groin hernia repair: interposition without fixation of Dacron tulle prosthesis by subperitoneal median approach. Chirurgie 99(2):119–123 (French)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bury K, Smietanski M (2012) 5-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing a polypropylene mesh with a poliglecaprone and polypropylene composite mesh for inguinal hernioplasty. Hernia 16(5):549–553

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Currie A, Andrew H, Tonsi A, Hurley PR, Taribagil S (2012) Lightweight vs. heavyweight mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 26(8):2126–2133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stechemesser B, Jacob DA, Schug-Paß C et al (2012) Herniamed: an internet-based registry for outcome research in hernia surgery. Hernia 16(3):269–276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Köckerling F, Schug-Pass C (2014) What do we know about titanized polypropylene meshes? An evidence-based review of the literature. Hernia 18(4):445–457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhu LM, Schuster P, Klinge U (2015) Mesh implants: an overview of crucial mesh parameters. World J Gastrointest Surg 27(10):226 236 7(

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sardey HM1, Schopf S, Rudert W, Knappich P, Hernandez-Richter T (2004) Titanised polypropylene meshes: first clinical experience with the implantation in TAPP technique and the results of a survey in 22 German surgical departments [article in German]. Zentralbl Chir 129(5):363–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Daes J, Felix E (2017) Critical view of the myopectineal orifice. Ann Surg 266:e1–e2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bendavid R (1992) The space of Bogros and the deep inguinal venous circulation. Surg Gynecol Obstet 174(5):355–358

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Köhler G, Mayer F, Lechner M, Bittner R (2015) Small bowel obstruction after TAPP repair caused by a self-anchoring barbed suture device for peritoneal closure: case report and review of the literature. Hernia 19(3):389–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Miserez M, Alexandre JH, Campanelli G et al (2007) The European hernia society groin hernia classification: simple and easy to remember. Hernia 11(2):113–116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee SR (2017) Clinical characteristics and laparoscopic treatment of supravesical hernia. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 27(11):1192–1197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Antoniou SA, Köhler G, Antoniou GA, Muysoms FE, Pointner R, Granderath FA (2016) Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing nonpenetrating vs mechanical mesh fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg 211(1):239–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mayer F, Niebuhr H, Lechner M et al (2016) When is mesh fixation in TAPP-repair of primary inguinal hernia repair necessary? The register-based analysis of 11,230 cases. Surg Endosc 30(10):4363–4371

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Köhler.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

G. K. has received honorariums from Medtronic, Dahlhausen and Bard for lectures and educational activities. I. F. declares no conflict of interest. No competing financial interests exist. R. K. declares no conflict of interest. No competing financial interests exist. M. M. declares no conflict of interest. No competing financial interests exist. G. S. has received honorariums from Medtronic and AFS-Medical for lectures und educational activities outside this work. AFS is the company marketing the T02 mesh but the honorariums was not paid for suggesting changes in mesh configurations and mesh development. A. S. has received honorariums from Medtronic and AFS-Medical for lectures und educational activities outside this work. AFS is the company marketing the T02 mesh but the honorariums was not paid for suggesting changes in mesh configurations and mesh development.

Ethical approval

No ethical approval was required for this study.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

All patients provided informed consent for treatment with the newly designed CE certified mesh and TAPP procedure.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Köhler, G., Fischer, I., Kaltenböck, R. et al. Critical evaluation of an innovative mesh for bilateral transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair of inguinal hernias. Hernia 22, 857–862 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1786-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-018-1786-0

Keywords

Navigation