Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Pre-made consent for elective inguinal hernia repair: the need for standardisation—a survey of all UK NHS Trusts

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Elective inguinal hernia repair (IHR) is one of the most commonly performed operations in the UK. As with all procedures, informed consent is essential. Pre-made consent forms have been suggested to improve consenting practice. This study aimed to assess the usage and quality of pre-made hernia-specific consent forms (PCF) in the UK.

Methods

A freedom of information request was sent to all UK NHS Trusts asking: (1) does the trust perform IHRs; (2) do they have a PCF; and (3) to send a copy. Complications lists on received forms were reviewed and compared to those listed on the British Hernia Society (BHS) “patient information” webpage.

Results

157/185 Trusts (85%) responded. 117/157 (75%) perform IHRs; 16/117 (14%) use PCFs. The number of reported risks was variable (range 4–18), as was the content of each form (28 different risks were listed). Quoted percentage risks were inconsistent (e.g. recurrence range < 1–5%). The frequency of each BHS-quoted risk was (open/laparoscopic): Bleeding 62/75%; infection 85/92%; seroma 31/42%; damage to testicular blood supply 69/75%; damage to abdominal contents NA/25%; haematoma 62/67%; venous thromboembolism 54/50%; recurrence 85/83%; chronic pain 77/58%; mesh infection 23/8%. Zero forms contained all BHS-quoted risks.

Conclusions

Whilst the consent form only provides documentation of the consent process, this study suggests that PCFs do not improve the quality of consent as both the type and likelihood of quoted complications were highly variable between Trusts. As follow-up for elective procedures is rare, it is unlikely that this variability reflects actual measured outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. HES Development (PROMs) Team (2014) Finalised patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in England. Health and Social Care Information centre. http://content.digital.nhs.uk/catalogue/PUB14574/final-proms-eng-apr12-mar13-fin-report-v1.pdf. Accessed 05 Feb 2017

  2. NHS Choices (2016) Consent to treatment. National Health Service. http://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/Consent-to-treatment/Pages/Introduction.aspx. Accessed 05 Febr 2017

  3. General Medical Council (2008) Consent: patients and doctors making decisions together. http://www.gmc-uk.org/Consent___English_1015.pdf_48903482.pdf. Accessed 05 Feb 2017

  4. Department of Health (2009) Reference guide to consent for examination or treatment, second addition 2009. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/138296/dh_103653__1_.pdf. Accessed 05 Feb 2017

  5. British Hernia Society (2017) What are the risks of surgery? http://www.britishherniasociety.org/for-patients/what-are-the-risks-of-surgery/ Accessed 29 May 2017

  6. American College of Surgeons (2016) Groin hernia repair: Inguinal and femoral. https://www.facs.org/~/media/files/education/patient%20ed/groin%20hernia.ashx. Accessed 29 May 2017

  7. Shiwani MH, Gosling J (2009) Variations in the quality of consent for open mesh repair of inguinal hernia. Hernia 13(1):73–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-008-0431-8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoosein MM, Towse H, Conn G, Stoker DL (2008) Consenting practice for open inguinal hernia repairs—are we failing to warn patients of serious complications? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 90(8):643–646. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588408X318165

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen AM, Leff DR, Simpson J, Cahdwick SJ, McDonald PJ (2006) Variations in consenting practice for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 88(5):482–485

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Alkhaffaf B, Decadt B (2010) Litigation following groin hernia repair in England. Hernia 14(2):181–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-009-0595-x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Clarke K, O’Loughlin P, Cashman J (2015) Standardized consent: the effect of information sheets on information retention. J Patient Saf. https://doi.org/10.1097/pts.0000000000000230 (Epub)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Barritt AW, Clark L, Teoh V, Cohen AM, Gibb PA (2010) Assessing the adequacy of procedure-specific consent forms in orthopaedic surgery against current methods of operative consent. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 92(3):246–249. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588410X12628812458257

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Finch WJ, Rochester MA, Mills RD (2009) A randomised trial of conventional versus BAUS procedure-specific consent forms for transurethral resection of prostate. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 91(3):232–238. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588409X359277

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Rahman L, Clamp J, Hutchinson J (2011) Is consent for hip fracture surgery for older people adequate? The case for pre-printed consent forms. J Med Ethics 37(3):187–189. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2010.039644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Royal College of Surgeons of England (2016) Consent: supported decision-making. RCS Professional and clinical standards. https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/standards-and-research/standards-and-guidance/good-practice-guides/consent/ Accessed 29 May 2017

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Kayll Road, Sunderland, SR4 7TP, UK

    M. J. Courtney & T. J. Royle

  2. 30 The Gardens, Whitley Bay, Tyne and Wear, NE25 8BG, UK

    M. J. Courtney

Authors
  1. M. J. Courtney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. J. Royle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. J. Courtney.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

MC and TR declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

In this article no patient care was involved.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Courtney, M.J., Royle, T.J. Pre-made consent for elective inguinal hernia repair: the need for standardisation—a survey of all UK NHS Trusts. Hernia 22, 549–553 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1708-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1708-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation