Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

In vitro assessment of an antibacterial quaternary ammonium-based polymer loaded with chlorhexidine for the coating of polypropylene prosthetic meshes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study assesses the use of an absorbable polymer loaded with chlorhexidine (CHX) as an antibacterial coating for polypropylene (PP) meshes employed in hernia repair.

Methods

The polymer N,N-dimethyl-N-benzyl-N-(2-methacryloyloxyethyl) ammonium bromide was loaded with CHX (1 % w/w). Fragments (1 cm2) of Optilene® Mesh Elastic were coated either with the unloaded (POL) or CHX-loaded polymer (POL–CHX). Uncoated fragments (PP) served as controls. The release kinetics of the POL–CHX coating was monitored by HPLC. Sterile fragments were placed on agar plates previously contaminated with 106 CFU of Staphylococcus aureus (Sa) ATCC25923, Staphylococcus epidermidis (Se) ATCC12228, or Escherichia coli (Ec) ATCC25922 and incubated at 37 °C for 1/2/7 days. At each time point, inhibition halos were measured and bacterial adhesion to the meshes quantified by sonication and scanning electron microscopy. Coating cytotoxic effects were examined on cultured fibroblasts.

Results

The polymer coating gradually released CHX over 3 days. Inhibition halos were produced only around the POL–CHX-coated meshes and these were significantly smaller for Ec than Sa or Se (p < 0.01). While POL–CHX prevented bacterial adhesion to the mesh, the reduced bacterial yields over time were observed for the POL-coated versus control PP meshes (p < 0.001). By day 7, only Ec remained attached to the surface of control meshes. The POL coating was not cytotoxic, yet POL–CHX reduced the viability of cultured fibroblasts.

Conclusions

When loaded with the antiseptic CHX, this quaternary ammonium-based polymer coating released its contents in a controlled manner indicating its potential prophylactic use to reduce the risk of infection following PP mesh implantation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Veerachamy S, Yarlagadda T, Manivasagam G, Yarlagadda PK (2014) Bacterial adherence and biofilm formation on medical implants: a review. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 228(10):1083–1099

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Montgomery A, Kallinowski F, Köckerling F (2016) Evidence for replacement of an infected synthetic by a biological mesh in abdominal wall hernia repair. Front Surg 2:67

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Dietz UA, Spor L, Germer CT (2011) Management of mesh-related infections. Chirurg 82(3):208–217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rutkow IM (2003) Demographic and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States in 2003. Surg Clin N Am 83(5):1045–1051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Albino FP, Patel KM, Nahabedian MY, Attinger CE, Bhanot P (2015) Immediate, multistaged approach to infected synthetic mesh: outcomes after abdominal wall reconstruction with porcine acellular dermal matrix. Ann Plast Surg 75(6):629–633

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sanders DL, Kingsnorth AN, Lambie J, Bond P, Moate R, Steer JA (2013) An experimental study exploring the relationship between the size of bacterial inoculum and bacterial adherence to prosthetic mesh. Surg Endosc 27(3):978–985

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yabanoğlu H, Arer İM, Çalıskan K (2015) The effect of the use of synthetic mesh soaked in antibiotic solution on the rate of graft infection in ventral hernias: a prospective randomized study. Int Surg 100(6):1040–1047

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Falagas ME, Kasiakou SK (2005) Mesh-related infections after hernia repair surgery. Clin Microbiol Infect 11(1):3–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Donlan RM, Costerton JW (2002) Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev 15(2):167–193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Majumder A, Neupane R, Novitsky YW (2015) Antibiotic coating of hernia meshes: the next step toward preventing mesh infection. Surg Technol Int 27:147–153

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cobb WS, Carbonell AM, Kalbaugh CL, Jones Y, Lokey JS (2009) Infection risk of open placement of intraperitoneal composite mesh. Am Surg 75(9):762–767 (Discussion 767–768)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wiegering A, Sinha B, Spor L, Klinge U, Steger U, Germer CT, Dietz UA (2014) Gentamicin for prevention of intraoperative mesh contamination: demonstration of high bactericide effect (in vitro) and low systemic bioavailability (in vivo). Hernia 18(5):691–700

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fernández-Gutiérrez M, Olivares E, Pascual G, Bellón JM, San Román J (2013) Low-density polypropylene meshes coated with resorbable and biocompatible hydrophilic polymers as controlled release agents of antibiotics. Acta Biomater 9(4):6006–6018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Junge K, Rosch R, Klinge U, Krones C, Klosterhalfen B, Mertens PR, Lynen P, Kunz D, Preiss A, Peltroche-Llacsahuanga H, Schumpelick V (2005) Gentamicin supplementation of polyvinylidenfluoride mesh materials for infection prophylaxis. Biomaterials 26(7):787–793

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Parra F, Vázquez B, Benito L, Barcenilla J, San Román J (2009) Foldable antibacterial acrylic intraocular lenses of high refractive index. Biomacromolecules 10(11):3055–3061

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Parra-Ruiz F, Toledano E, Fernández-Gutiérrez M, Dinjaski N, Prieto MA, Vázquez-Lasa B, San Román J (2011) Polymeric systems containing dual biologically active ions. Eur J Med Chem 46(10):4980–4991

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tambe SM, Sampath L, Modak SM (2001) In vitro evaluation of the risk of developing bacterial resistance to antiseptics and antibiotics used in medical devices. J Antimicrob Chemother 47(5):589–598

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Horner C, Mawer D, Wilcox M (2012) Reduced susceptibility to chlorhexidine in staphylococci: is it increasing and does it matter? J Antimicrob Chemother 67(11):2547–2559

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pérez-Köhler B, García-Moreno F, Bayon Y, Pascual G, Bellón JM (2015) Inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus adhesion to the surface of a reticular heavyweight polypropylene mesh soaked in a combination of chlorhexidine and allicin: an in vitro study. PLoS One 10(5):e0126711

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Pérez-Köhler B, García-Moreno F, Brune T, Pascual G, Bellón JM (2015) Preclinical bioassay of a polypropylene mesh for hernia repair pretreated with antibacterial solutions of chlorhexidine and allicin: an in vivo study. PLoS One 10(11):e0142768

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Harth KC, Rosen MJ, Thatiparti TR, Jacobs MR, Halaweish I, Bajaksouzian S, Furlan J, von Recum HA (2010) Antibiotic-releasing mesh coating to reduce prosthetic sepsis: an in vivo study. J Surg Res 163(2):337–343

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Stebbins ND, Ouimet MA, Uhrich KE (2014) Antibiotic-containing polymers for localized, sustained drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 78:77–87

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Guillaume O, Lavigne JP, Lefranc O, Nottelet B, Coudane J, Garric X (2011) New antibiotic-eluting mesh used for soft tissue reinforcement. Acta Biomater 7(9):3390–3397

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kenawy ER, Worley SD, Broughton R (2007) The chemistry and applications of antimicrobial polymers: a state of the art review. Biomacromolecules 8(5):1359–1384

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Engelsman AF, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ, Ploeg RJ (2008) Morphological aspects of surgical meshes as a risk factor for bacterial colonization. Br J Surg 95(8):1051–1059

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kougia E, Tselepi M, Vasilopoulos G, Lainioti GCh, Koromilas ND, Druvari D, Bokias G, Vantarakis A, Kallitsis JK (2015) Evaluation of antimicrobial efficiency of new polymers comprised by covalently attached and/or electrostatically bound bacteriostatic species, based on quaternary ammonium compounds. Molecules 20(12):21313–21327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Loothens JA (2013) Quaternary ammonium compounds. In: Moriarty TFJ, Zaat SAJ, Busscher HJ (eds) Biomaterials associated infection: immunological aspects and antimicrobial strategies, 1st edn. Springer, New York, pp 379–404

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Pérez-Köhler.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

BPK declares no conflicts of interest. MFG declares no conflicts of interest. GP declares no conflicts of interest. FGM declares no conflicts of interest. JSR declares no conflicts of interest. JMB declares no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted.

Informed consent

No informed consent.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pérez-Köhler, B., Fernández-Gutiérrez, M., Pascual, G. et al. In vitro assessment of an antibacterial quaternary ammonium-based polymer loaded with chlorhexidine for the coating of polypropylene prosthetic meshes. Hernia 20, 869–878 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-016-1537-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-016-1537-z

Keywords

Navigation