Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Living scaffolds: surgical repair using scaffolds seeded with human adipose-derived stem cells

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Decellularized porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) is a biological scaffold used surgically for tissue repair. Here, we demonstrate a model of SIS as a scaffold for human adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) in vitro and apply it in vivo in a rat ventral hernia repair model.

Study design

ASCs adherence was examined by confocal microscopy and proliferation rate was measured by growth curves. Multipotency of ASCs seeded onto SIS was tested using adipogenic, chondrogenic, and osteogenic induction media. For in vivo testing, midline abdominal musculofascial and peritoneal defects were created in Sprague–Dawley rats. Samples were evaluated for tensile strength, histopathology and immunohistochemistry.

Results

All test groups showed cell adherence and proliferation on SIS. Fibronectin-treated scaffolds retained more cells than those treated with vehicle alone (p < 0.05). Fresh stromal vascular fraction (SVF) pellets containing ASCs were injected onto the SIS scaffold and showed similar results to cultured ASCs. Maintenance of multipotency on SIS was confirmed by lineage-specific markers and dyes. Histopathology revealed neovascularization and cell influx to ASC-seeded SIS samples following animal implantation. ASC-seeded SIS appeared to offer a stronger repair than plain SIS, but these results were not statistically significant. Immunohistochemistry showed continued presence of cells of human origin in ASC-seeded repairs at 1 month postoperation.

Conclusion

Pretreatment of the scaffold with fibronectin offers a method to increase cell adhesion and delivery. ASCs maintain their immunophenotype and ability to differentiate while on SIS. Seeding freshly isolated SVF onto the scaffold demonstrated that minimally manipulated cells may be useful for perioperative surgical applications within the OR suite. We have shown that this model for a “living mesh” can be successfully used in abdominal wall reconstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

SIS:

Small intestinal submucosa

hASCs:

Human adipose-derived stem cells

SVF:

Stromal vascular fraction

FN:

Fibronectin

CDT:

Cell doubling time

References

  1. Millikan KW (2003) Incisional hernia repair. Surg Clin North Am 83(5):1223–1234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Leber GE et al (1998) Long-term complications associated with prosthetic repair of incisional hernias. Arch Surg 133(4):378–382

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Malangoni MA, Rosen MJ (2012) Hernias. In: Sabiston DC, Townsend CM (eds) Sabiston textbook of surgery: the biological basis of modern surgical practice. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1114–1140

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Slater NJ et al (2013) Biologic grafts for ventral hernia repair: a systematic review. Am J Surg 205(2):220–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lindroos B, Suuronen R, Miettinen S (2011) The potential of adipose stem cells in regenerative medicine. Stem Cell Rev 7(2):269–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Iyyanki TS et al (2015) Adipose-derived stem-cell-seeded non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrix increases cellular infiltration, vascular infiltration, and mechanical strength of ventral hernia repairs. Tissue Eng Part A 21(3–4):475–485

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Smart NJ, Marshall M, Daniels IR (2012) Biological meshes: a review of their use in abdominal wall hernia repairs. Surgeon 10(3):159–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhao Y et al (2012) Abdominal hernia repair with a decellularized dermal scaffold seeded with autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Artif Organs 36(3):247–255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McIlhenny SE et al (2010) Linear shear conditioning improves vascular graft retention of adipose-derived stem cells by upregulation of the alpha5beta1 integrin. Tissue Eng Part A 16(1):245–255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kesler KA et al (1986) Enhanced strength of endothelial attachment on polyester elastomer and polytetrafluoroethylene graft surfaces with fibronectin substrate. J Vasc Surg 3(1):58–64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ramalanjaona G et al (1986) The effect of fibronectin coating on endothelial cell kinetics in polytetrafluoroethylene grafts. J Vasc Surg 3(2):264–272

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zuk PA et al (2001) Multilineage cells from human adipose tissue: implications for cell-based therapies. Tissue Eng 7(2):211–228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim SJ et al (2009) A multi-center, randomized, clinical study to compare the effect and safety of autologous cultured osteoblast (Ossron) injection to treat fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 10:20

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Tan BK et al (2007) Raised serum, adipocyte, and adipose tissue retinol-binding protein 4 in overweight women with polycystic ovary syndrome: effects of gonadal and adrenal steroids. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92(7):2764–2772

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mo XT et al (2009) Variations in the ratios of co-cultured mesenchymal stem cells and chondrocytes regulate the expression of cartilaginous and osseous phenotype in alginate constructs. Bone 45(1):42–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Steurer JA et al (2011) Chronic hernia repair in a rat model using small intestinal submucosa. J Invest Surg 24(5):227–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen TT et al (2010) Anchorage of VEGF to the extracellular matrix conveys differential signaling responses to endothelial cells. J Cell Biol 188(4):595–609

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Chang HL et al (2010) Uterine leiomyomas exhibit fewer stem/progenitor cell characteristics when compared with corresponding normal myometrium. Reprod Sci 17(2):158–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hunt ME, Brown DR (2005) Mycoplasma alligatoris infection promotes CD95 (FasR) expression and apoptosis of primary cardiac fibroblasts. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 12(12):1370–1377

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Falco EE, Roth JS, Fisher JP (2008) EH Networks as a scaffold for skeletal muscle regeneration in abdominal wall hernia repair. J Surg Res 149(1):76–83

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wei RQ et al (2009) Grafts of porcine small intestinal submucosa with cultured autologous oral mucosal epithelial cells for esophageal repair in a canine model. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 234(4):453–461

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Qin HH, Dunn JC (2011) Small intestinal submucosa seeded with intestinal smooth muscle cells in a rodent jejunal interposition model. J Surg Res 171(1):e21–e26

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Fann SA et al (2006) A model of tissue-engineered ventral hernia repair. J Invest Surg 19(3):193–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ayele T et al (2010) Tissue engineering approach to repair abdominal wall defects using cell-seeded bovine tunica vaginalis in a rabbit model. J Mater Sci Mater Med 21(5):1721–1730

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kern S et al (2006) Comparative analysis of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, or adipose tissue. Stem Cells 24(5):1294–1301

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hunt GC, Singh P, Schwarzbauer JE (2012) Endogenous production of fibronectin is required for self-renewal of cultured mouse embryonic stem cells. Exp Cell Res 318(15):1820–1831

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. DeLise AM, Fischer L, Tuan RS (2000) Cellular interactions and signaling in cartilage development. Osteoarthr Cartil 8(5):309–334

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Singh P, Schwarzbauer JE (2012) Fibronectin and stem cell differentiation—lessons from chondrogenesis. J Cell Sci 125(Pt 16):3703–3712

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Wu W, Niklason L, Steinbacher DM (2013) The effect of age on human adipose-derived stem cells. Plast Reconstr Surg 131(1):27–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Guadalajara H et al (2012) Long-term follow-up of patients undergoing adipose-derived adult stem cell administration to treat complex perianal fistulas. Int J Colorectal Dis 27(5):595–600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Support for this study was provided in part by NIH grant R01HL073980 (TNT) and DOD contract W81XW H08-2-00 (TNT). Biodesign was a kind gift of Cook Biotech (West Lafayette, IN).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. N. Tulenko.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klinger, A., Kawata, M., Villalobos, M. et al. Living scaffolds: surgical repair using scaffolds seeded with human adipose-derived stem cells. Hernia 20, 161–170 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1415-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1415-0

Keywords

Navigation